Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-872-2 | CAS number: 6798-03-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, gene mutation was predicted for Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)(6798-03-4). The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)was predicted to not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence, according to the prediction made, it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro. Based on the predicted result it can be concluded that the substance is considered to not toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from OECD QSAR Toolbox version 3.3 and the supporting QMRF report has been attached.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mention below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction is done using OECD QSAR Toolbox version 3.3, 2018
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name: disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)
InChI:1S/C32H25N7O14S4.2Cu.2Na/c33-54(44,45)19-3-7-25(40)23(13-19)36-38-29-27(56(48,49)50)11-15-9-17(1-5-21(15)31(29)42)35-18-2-6-22-16(10-18)12-28(57(51,52)53)30(32(22)43)39-37-24-14-20(55(34,46)47)4-8-26(24)41;;;;/h1-14,35,40-43H,(H2,33,44,45)(H2,34,46,47)(H,48,49,50)(H,51,52,53);;;;/q;2*+2;2*+1/p-6/b38-36+,39-37+;;;;
SMILES:NS(=O)(=O)c1ccc(O{-}.[Na]{+})c(N=Nc2c3cc4cc(ccc4c2O{-}.[Na]{+})Nc2ccc4c(c2)cc(c2c4O{-}.[Cu]{2+}.O{-}c4ccc(S(N)(=O)=O)cc4N=N2)S(=O)(=O)O{-}.[Cu]{2+}.O{-}S3(=O)=O)c1
Mol. formula: C32H19Cu2N7Na2O14S4
Molecular Weight: 1026.87 g/mole - Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 metabolic activation
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- not specified
- Vehicle / solvent:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- not specified
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- not specified
- Rationale for test conditions:
- not specified
- Evaluation criteria:
- Prediction was done considering a dose dependent increase in the number of revertants/plate.
- Statistics:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic effect were observed
- Conclusions:
- Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)(6798-03-4)was predicted to not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence, according to the prediction made, it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro
- Executive summary:
Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, gene mutation was predicted for Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)(6798-03-4). The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 with S9 metabolic activation system. Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)was predicted to not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence, according to the prediction made, it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro. Based on the predicted result it can be concluded that the substance is considered to not toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: "Gene mutation"
Estimation method: Takes highest mode value from the 6 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
(((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" )
and "e" )
and "f" )
and ("g"
and (
not "h")
)
)
and ("i"
and (
not "j")
)
)
and "k" )
and "l" )
and ("m"
and "n" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Amine OR Anion OR Aromatic
compound OR Azo compound OR Cation OR Secondary amine OR Secondary
aromatic amine OR Sulfonamide OR Sulfonic acid derivative by Organic
functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Nitrogen, one aromatic
attach [-N] OR Aliphatic Nitrogen, two aromatic attach [-N-] OR Aromatic
Carbon [C] OR Azo [-N=N-] OR Miscellaneous metal [Ni, Cu, Zr, Be] OR
Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) OR Nitrogen, two or tree
olefinic attach [>N-] OR Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] OR Oxygen, one
aromatic attach [-O-] OR Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} OR Sulfamide, aromatic
attach [-SO2-N] OR Sulfonate, aromatic attach [-SO2-O] OR Sulfonyl
amide, aromatic attach [-S(=O)N-] OR Sulfur, nitrogen attach [-S-] by
Organic functional groups (US EPA) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aryl OR Azo OR
Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR Overlapping groups OR Phenol OR
Sulfonamide OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups (nested) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aryl OR Azo OR
Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR Naphtalene OR Phenol OR Sulfonamide OR
Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by
OASIS v.1.3 ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by
OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, MW>500 by Estrogen
Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Moderate binder, OH grooup OR
Non binder, impaired OH or NH2 group OR Non binder, non cyclic structure
OR Non binder, without OH or NH2 group OR Strong binder, OH group OR
Very strong binder, OH group OR Weak binder, OH group by Estrogen
Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkali Earth AND Non-Metals AND
Transition Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkaline Earth OR Halogens by
Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine AND Aryl AND Azo
AND Fused carbocyclic aromatic AND Naphtalene AND Phenol AND Sulfonamide
AND Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine AND Aryl AND Azo
AND Fused carbocyclic aromatic AND Overlapping groups AND Phenol AND
Sulfonamide AND Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups (nested) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -5.11
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= -1.27
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Genetic mutation in vitro;
Prediction model based estimation and data from read across chemical have been reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)(6798-03-4). The studies are as mentioned below
Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, gene mutation was predicted for Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)(6798-03-4). The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)was predicted to not induce gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence, according to the prediction made, it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro. Based on the predicted result it can be concluded that the substance is considered to not toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, chromosomal aberration was predicted for Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl] azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)(6798-03-4).The study assumed the use of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line with and without S9 metabolic activation system for Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)was predicted to not induce chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence, according to the prediction made, it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro. Based on the predicted result it can be concluded that the substance is considered to not toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
In a study for structurally and functionally similar read across chemical, Gene mutation toxicity study was performed by Aparajita Das et al.( Int J Hum Genet,2004) to determine the mutagenic nature of Amaranth [Food Red 2]; IUPAC Name; Amaranth dye; trisodium (4E)-3-oxo-4-[(4- sulfonato-1- naphthyl)hydrazono]naphthalene- 2,7-disulfonate; trisodium 3-hydroxy-4-[(4-sulfonato-1-naphthyl)diazenyl]naphthalene-2,7-disulfonate (915-67-3) .The read across substances share high similarity in structure and log kow .Therefore, it is acceptable to derive information on mutation from the analogue substance. Ames mutagenicity assay was performed to evaluate the mutagenic nature of the test compound Amaranth in plate incorporation assay. The test material was tested at a concentration of 10,100,250,500 and 1000 μg /plate. The plates were inverted within an hour and placed in a dark vented incubator at 37⁰C for 48 hours. Positive controls (for TA97a and TA98, 20 μg/plate nitro phenylene diamine and for TA100, 1.5 μg/plate sodium azide) and negative controls were maintained concurrently for all the experiments. Three plates were used for each set. After 48 hours of incubation, the revertant colonies were counted. ANOVA test was performed at 0.05 levels. Amaranth [Food Red 2] was considered to be non - mutagenic under the study conditions.
In a study for structurally and functionally similar read across chemical, Gene mutation toxicity study was performed by H. E. Seifried et al.( Chem. Res. Toxicol,2006) to determine the mutagenic nature of Brilliant Black 1; IUPAC name; tetrasodium 4-acetamido-5-hydroxy-6-({7-sulfonato-4-[(4-sulfonatophenyl) diazenyl]-1-naphthyl}diazeny... (2519-30-4). The read across substances share high similarity in structure and log kow .Therefore, it is acceptable to derive information on mutation from the analogue substance. The mutagenic potency of C.I Brilliant black BN( food black 1) was tested by the plate incorporation method usingSalmonella typhimuriumstrainTA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538. When the test bacterial strain is exposed with the test chemical for 48hrs, no mutagenic response was seen in any of the strains of Salmonella typhimurium(with and without metabolic activation system).
Based on the data available for the target chemical and its read across substance and applying weight of evidence of Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)(6798-03-4) does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above annotation and CLP criteria for the target chemical Disodium [μ-[[7,7'-iminobis[4-hydroxy-3-[[2-hydroxy-5-sulphamoylphenyl]azo]naphthalene-2-sulphonato]](6-)]]dicuprate(2-)(6798-03-4) does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro Hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.