Disodium 7,7'-(carbonyldiimino)bis[4-hydroxy-3-(phenylazo)naphthalene-2-sulphonate]

Endpoint summary

Description of key information

Oral toxicity: LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw
Dermal toxicity: LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Endpoint:

acute toxicity: oral

Type of information:

other: read across from similar substance

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

From 20 march to 10 april 2007

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: Poory details

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

no

Remarks:

This study was conducted in a facility operating to Good Laboratory Practice within the UK national GLP monitoring programme, but the study report has not been audited by the QA Unit. No formal claim of GLP compliance is made for this study.

Test type:

fixed dose procedure

Limit test:

yes

Species:

rat

Strain:

Sprague-Dawley

Sex:

female

Route of administration:

oral: unspecified

Vehicle:

arachis oil

Details on oral exposure:

VEHICLE
Dose of test material was administrated as a suspension in arachis oil BP at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight

Doses:

Single oral dose of 2000 mglkg,

No. of animals per sex per dose:

4 females

Details on study design:

- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes; all animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
- Other examinations performed: Clinical signs and body weight development were monitored during the study.

Sex:

female

Dose descriptor:

discriminating dose

Effect level:

ca. 2 000 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

> 2 000 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Remarks on result:

other: Estimated

Mortality:

There were no deaths.

Clinical signs:

No signs of systemic toxicity were noted during the study.

Body weight:

All animals showed expected gains in bodyweight over the study period.

Other findings:

No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Interpretation of results:

not classified

Remarks:

Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU

Conclusions:

The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Sprague-Dawley CD strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System Category - Unclassified).
The test material was considered to have no significant acute toxic risk if swallowed and did not meet the criteria for classification according to EU labelling regulations Commission Directive 2001/59/EC for classification and labelling of dangerous substances.

Executive summary:

The study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test material following a single oral administration in the Sprague-Dawley CD strain rat (SPL Standard Test Method 518.04). The method followed the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No 420 "Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method" (adopted l7 December 2001). The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Sprague-Dawley CD strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System Category - Unclassified)

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Value:

2 000 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Endpoint:

acute toxicity: dermal

Type of information:

other: read across from similar substance

Adequacy of study:

key study

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: Few details available on test procedures.

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)

GLP compliance:

not specified

Test type:

standard acute method

Species:

rat

Strain:

Wistar

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

> 2 000 mg/kg bw

Interpretation of results:

not classified

Remarks:

Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU

Conclusions:

According to European Union legislation substance of low toxicity (LD50 >2000 mg/kg b.w.) is not classified to the class of toxicity based on the strength of toxicity in acute exposure conditions.

Executive summary:

According to European Union legislation, substance of low toxicity (LD50 >2000 mg/kg b.w.) is not classified to the class of toxicity based on the strength of toxicity in acute dermal exposure conditions.

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Value:

2 000 mg/kg bw

Additional information

Direct Orange 26 is not toxic by oral and dermal route of exposure.

The results of the studies available on similar substances confirm that this family of dye, ureids, is not toxic until high dose.

Acute oral

In all studies no concerns arise from the results. Direct Orange 26 is not toxic at limit fixed for classify in CLP regulation.

Acute inhalation

No study available

Acute dermal

In all studies is not identified a 50-letal dose.
The other studies have been tested on some dyes, structural analogues of Direct Orange 26. Also in these case has not been identified a limit dose, but all confirm that the tested substances are not toxic until high doses, far from limit fixed for classify in CLP regulation.

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008), table 3.1.1, Acute toxicity hazard categories and acute toxicity estimates (ATE) defining the respective categories:

For Acute toxicity oral route:

Category 1: ATE <= 5 mg/kg bw

Category 2: 5 < ATE <= 50 mg/kg bw

Category 3: 50 < ATE <= 300 mg/kg bw

Category 4: 300 < ATE <= 2000 mg/kg bw

The LD50 of the test substance was determined to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw in the chosen reference test, which is outside the above criteria. Therefore, the test substance is not classified for Acute toxicity by oral exposure