Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Not reported
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1978
Report date:
1978

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Method according to the Federal Register 38 No. 187 § 1500.42 (eye)
Version / remarks:
1973
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
Study pre-dates GLP

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,6-bis(ethylamino)-9-[2-(methoxycarbonyl)phenyl]-2,7-dimethylxanthylium chloride
EC Number:
221-326-1
EC Name:
3,6-bis(ethylamino)-9-[2-(methoxycarbonyl)phenyl]-2,7-dimethylxanthylium chloride
Cas Number:
3068-39-1
Molecular formula:
C27H29N2O3.Cl
IUPAC Name:
3,6-bis(ethylamino)-9-[2-(methoxycarbonyl)phenyl]-2,7-dimethylxanthylium chloride

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Albino
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: Approximately 3 to 4 kg
- Housing: Animals were singly housed in a stainless steel cage without litter
- Diet: Standard pellet feed for rabbits provided ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: >3 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22 ± 1 °C
- Humidity: 55 ± 10 % (relative)
- Photoperiod: 12 hour light/12 hour dark cycle (07:00 to 19:00)

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 100 mg
Observation period (in vivo):
Animals were observed for signs of irritation and toxicity 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after test material instillation and observations were continued for 7 days.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6 animals
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No rinsing occurred

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scale

CORNEA
Opacity: degree of density (area most dense is taken for reading)
0: No opacity
1: Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity, details of iris clearly visible
2: Easily discernible translucent area, details of iris slightly obscured
3: Opalescent area, no details of iris visible, size of pupil barely discernible
4: Opaque, iris invisible

IRIS
0: Normal
1: Folds above normal, congestion, swelling, circumcorneal injection (any or all of these or combination of any thereof) still reacting to light (sluggish reaction is positive)
2: No reaction to light, haemorrhage, gross destruction (any of all these or all together)

CONJUNCTIVAE
Redness: (refers to the most severe effect of palpebral and bulbar conjunctivae excluding cornea and iris)
0: Vessels normal
1: Vessels definitely injected above normal
2: More diffuse, deeper crimson red, individual vessels not easily discernible
3: Diffuse beefy red
Chemosis
0: No swelling
1: Any swelling above normal (includes nictating membranes)
2: Obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids.
3: Swelling with lids about half closed
4: Swelling with lids about half closed to completely closed
Discharge
0: No discharge
1: Any amount different from normal (does not include small amounts observed in inner canthus of normal animals)
2: Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs just adjacent to lids
3: Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs a considerable area around the eye

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of all animals that could be scored
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
3.9
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of all animals that could be scored
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(redness)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
Not possible to evaluate due to very strong swelling of cornea and iris
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
other:
Remarks:
discharge
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.7
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
1 hour post application, strong swelling of the conjunctivae with mild to severe oozing/ weeping of the eye was observed. Four rabbits were observed to have slight opacification of the cornea. From 24 hours post application until end of the observation period, the edges of the eyelids were strongly hardened with discharge for all rabbits. Eyes were initially covered in mucous, which later on became purulent and glued together. Any redness caused by the test material could not be determined due to extreme swelling of the eyes. After seven days post application, the observations were essentially the same as the observations after 72 hours.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Individual Scores

Time Point (h)

Rabbit number

Evaluation

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctival redness

Chemosis

Discharge

24

1

*

*

**

4

3

2

*

*

**

4

3

3

*

*

**

4

3

4

*

*

**

4

3

5

4

2

**

4

3

6

3

2

**

4

3

48

1

*

*

**

4

3

2

*

*

**

4

3

3

4

2

**

4

3

4

4

2

**

4

2

5

4

2

**

4

2

6

4

2

**

4

2

72

1

*

*

**

4

3

2

*

*

**

4

3

3

4

2

**

4

3

4

4

2

**

4

3

5

4

2

**

4

2

6

4

2

**

4

1

*Assesment not possible due to staining of the eye as the test material is a red colour

**Not determined due to strong swelling of the cornea and iris

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Requires classification as Category 1 in accordance with EU classification criteria
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the study, the test material caused irreversible damage to the eyes and requires classification as Category 1.
Executive summary:

The potential of the test material to cause eye irritation was investigated in the albino rabbit using the German method according to the Federal Register 38 No. 187 § 1500.42 (eye) which is equivalent to the standardised guideline OECD 405.

A single 100 mg quantity of the test material was applied to one eye in each of 6 rabbits and the untreated eye was used as a control. Animals were observed for signs of irritation and toxicity 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after test material instillation.

1 hour post application, strong swelling of the conjunctivae with mild to severe oozing/ weeping of the eye was observed. Four rabbits were observed to have slight opacification of the cornea. From 24 hours post application until end of the observation period, the edges of the eyelids were strongly hardened with discharge for all rabbits. Eyes were initially covered in mucous, which later on became purulent and glued together. Any redness caused by the test material could not be determined due to extreme swelling of the eyes. After seven days post application, the observations were essentially the same as the observations after 72 hours.

Under the conditions of the study, the test material caused irreversible damage to the eyes and requires classification as Category 1.