Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
28 Apr - 19 May 2003
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2003
Report date:
2003

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
adopted 1987
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, Behörde für Arbeit, Gesundheit und Soziales, Hamburg, Germany

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,3,5-triallyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione
EC Number:
213-834-7
EC Name:
1,3,5-triallyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione
Cas Number:
1025-15-6
Molecular formula:
C12H15N3O3
IUPAC Name:
tris(prop-2-en-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazinane-2,4,6-trione

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Himalayan
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: approx. 5.5 months
- Weight at study initiation: 2.2-2.3 kg
- Housing: during the acclimatisation period and after the 8-hour period in restrainers (allowed free movement of the head but prevented a complete body turn), the animals were kept singly in cages (425 mm x 600 mm x 380 mm)
- Diet: ssniff® K-H V2333 (ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany); available ad libitum before and after the exposure period
- Water: tap water; availble ad libitum before and after the exposure period
- Acclimation period: at least 20 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- according to guideline

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 28 Apr 2003 To: 19 May 2003

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated left eyes served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application without washing
Observation period (in vivo):
up to 72 h
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 males
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE:
not rinsed

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp (prior to administration and 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after administration) and fluorescein (24 hours after administration)

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The cornea, iris and conjunctivae were not affected by instillation of the compound.
Other effects:
There were no systemic intolerance reactions.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this eye irritation study in the rabbit the test item did not cause any reaction to cornea, iris and conjunctivae.