Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
insufficient hazard data available (further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
insufficient hazard data available (further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - workers

The substance is not acutely toxic following oral administration or dermal application and therefore acute DNELs for systemic effects are not required. The substance was not irritating to the skin and did not show any sensitising potential therefore DNELs for local effects on skin are not required. The substance is irritating to eye and could be considered to be irritating also to the mucous membranes of the respiratory system; although inhalation DNELs for local effects (acute and long-term) would be required, no data on dose response are available and therefore DNELs cannot be derived.

Based on the available studies used to support the registration, the substance is considered to not be genotoxic.

The key value to be used for DNEL derivation is likely to be obtained from the OECD 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test) study. However, the study report was provided by the testing laboratory very close to the registration deadline and the content is still under discussion. As such, it is currently not possible to set DNELs for this substance. This issue will be revisited once the key values are finalised and a registration update containing the DNEL values will be submitted as soon as possible.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
insufficient hazard data available (further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
insufficient hazard data available (further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
insufficient hazard data available (further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - General Population

The substance is not acutely toxic following oral administration or dermal application and therefore acute DNELs for systemic effects are not required. The substance was not irritating to the skin and did not show any sensitising potential therefore DNELs for local effects on skin are not required. The substance is irritating to eye and could be considered to be irritating also to the mucous membranes of the respiratory system; although inhalation DNELs for local effects (acute and long-term) would be required, no data on dose response are available and therefore DNELs cannot be derived.

Based on the available studies used to support the registration, the substance is considered to not be genotoxic.

The key value to be used for DNEL derivation is likely to be obtained from the OECD 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test) study. However, the study report was provided by the testing laboratory very close to the registration deadline and the content is still under discussion. As such, it is currently not possible to set DNELs for this substance. This issue will be revisited once the key values are finalised and a registration update containing the DNEL values will be submitted as soon as possible.