Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
25.08 - 08.09.1980
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
The Ames test with chlorketone was performed in 1980 at Inveresk Research International (Edinburgh, Scotland), which is now part of Charles River Laboratories. The test was performed according to (at that time) state of the art practices. All steps / strains / solvents / test conditions are well described.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980
Report date:
1980

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Deviations:
not applicable
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Positive control compound: 2-aminoanthracene.
The test substance and positive control compound were dissolved
in dimethylsulphoxide ('AnalaR' grade from BDH Chemicals Limited, Poole, England).
Five strains of Salmonella typhimurium were used: TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98. The test was performed in the presence
and absence of a post-mitochondrial supernatant fraction from the livers of male rats and CO-factors required for mixed-function
oxidase activity.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-chloro-3-oxopentyl acetate
EC Number:
235-930-8
EC Name:
2-chloro-3-oxopentyl acetate
Cas Number:
13051-49-5
Molecular formula:
C7H11ClO3
IUPAC Name:
2-chloro-3-oxopentyl acetate

Method

Target gene:
All 5 strains contain the deep rough (rfa) mutation,
which deletes the polysaccharide side chain of the
lipopolysaccharide coat of the bacterial cell surface.
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: mutations in the histidine operon
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
mixed-function oxidase system
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
A preliminary toxicity study was performed in which strain
TA 100 was treated with the following concentrations of
chlorketone; 33.3 ug, 100.0 ug, 333.3 ug, 1.0 ug, 3.3 ug and
10.0 mg per plate. At the highest dose tested, the substance
was not toxic when S-9 mix was added to the plates, it was
therefore decided that it would be convenient to use 0.1 m1 of
undiluted chlorketone as the highest :dose in the main plate
test (0.1 ml of chlorketone weighs 132.9 mg).
Vehicle / solvent:

- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
no
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)


DURATION
- Preincubation period:
- Exposure duration: 2 days
- Expression time (cells in growth medium):
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent):
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):


SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays):
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays):
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays):


NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3


NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:


DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth


OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy:
- Determination of endoreplication:
- Other:


OTHER:
Evaluation criteria:
see below
Statistics:
see tables

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
positive
Remarks:
only for TA100 (10 mg/l)
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not determined
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
not relevant
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

no remarks

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
ambiguous

Chlorketone showed a weak mutagenic effect in strain TA 100 at a concentration
of 10.0 mg/plate. Metabolic activation by the liver homogenate fraction was necessary to produce mutagenic effects.
Executive summary:

The Ames test with chlorketone was performed in 1980 at Inveresk Research International (Edinburgh, Scotland), which is now part of Charles River Laboratories. The test was performed according to (at that time) state of the art practices. The test item was weakly mutagenic in strain TA100 at a dose level of 10 mg, 13.3 mg and 20 mg/plate (different repititions of the test). At each experiment, the threshold of an increase in the number of revertants of 1.5 compared to solvent controls was only marginally reached. Samples were run in triplicates. Looking at the individual data, strong varations in revertant numbers could be noted, in controls as well as in treated samples. Thus, the biological significance of the average 1.5-fold increase in revertant numbers is doupted. Moreover, in the OECD Guideline 471 for the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test, which is the standard of today, the maximum concentration to be tested is set to 5 mg/plate. At this concentration, Chlorketone gave a clear negative result. Thus, the result for Chlorketone in the Ames test is rather to be seen as "equivocal".

.