Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The primary skin irritation potential of the test item was investigated by topical semi-occlusive application of 0.5 mL to the intact left flank of each of three young adult New Zealand White rabbits. The duration of treatment was four hours. The scoring of skin reactions was performed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, as well as 7 and 10 days after removal of the dressing.

The mean score was calculated across 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal) for each animal for erythema/eschar grades and for oedema grades, separately.

The mean erythema/eschar score of the three animals was 0.67, 1.67 and 0.67, respectively, and the mean oedema score was 0, 0.33 and 0, respectively.

The application to the rabbit skin resulted in mild, early-onset and transient signs of irritation such as erythema, oedema and swelling. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 10 days after treatment, the end of the observation period for all animals. The test item caused no staining of the treated skin. No corrosive effects were noted on the treated skin of any animal at any measuring interval.

Thus, the test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit skin.

The primary eye irritation potential of the test item was investigated by instillation of 0.1 mL into one eye of each of three young adult New Zealand White rabbits. Scoring of irritation effects was performed approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after test item application. The scores of each animal at the following reading times (24, 48 and 72 hours) were used in calculating the respective mean values for each type of lesion. The primary eye irritation score was calculated by totaling the mean cumulative scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours and then dividing the resulting total by the number of data points. The primary eye irritation score was 0.33 (max. 13).

The eye reactions (mean values from 24 to 72 hours) consisted of grade 0 corneal opacity, grade 0 iris lesions, grade 0.33 redness of the conjunctivae and grade 0 chemosis of the conjunctivae.

The instillation into the eye resulted in mild, early-onset and transient ocular changes, such as reddening of the conjunctivae and sclerae, discharge and swelling. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 72 hours after treatment, the end of the observation period for all animals. No abnormal findings were observed in the cornea or iris of any animal at any reading. No corrosion was observed at any of the measuring intervals. No staining of the treated eyes by the test item was observed.

Thus, the test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit eye.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2001 - 2002
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
17-07-1992
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identity: ISOPROPYL N-LAUROYLSARCOSINATE
Description: pale yellow liquid
Batch number: 002013
Purity: 92.9 %
Stability of test item: stable under storage conditions
Expiry date: 31-03-2003
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Testsystem: New Zealand White Rabbit, SPF
Rationale: Recognized by the international guidelines as the recommended test system
Source: Elevage Scientifique des Dombes, Chatillon sur Chalaronne, France
Number of animals per test: 3 (1 m / 2 f)
Age at start of treatment: 11 weeks

Acclimatization: Under laboratory conditions after health examination. Only animals without any visual signs of illness were used for the study.
Standard Laboratory Conditions: Air-conditioned with target ranges for room temperature 17-23°C, relative humidity 30-70 % and approximately 10-15 air changes per hour. Room temperature and humidity were monitored continuously and values outside of these ranges may have occasionally occurred, usually following room cleaning. These transient variations are considered not to have any influence on the study and, therefore, these data are not reported but are retained at RCC. The animals were provided with an automatically controlled light cycle of 12 hours light and 12 hours dark. Music was played during the light period.
Accommodation: Individually in stainless steel cages equipped with feed hoppers, drinking water bowls, with wood and haysticks for gnawing.
Diet: Pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3418 rabbit maintenance diet ad libitum.
Water: Community tap water ad libitum.
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
0.5 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
up to 10 days
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
Four days before treatment, one flank was clipped with an electric clipper, exposing an area of approximately 100 cm2 (10 cm x 10 cm). The skin of the animals was examined one day before treatment, and regrown fur of all animals was again clipped. Animals with overt signs of skin injury or marked irritation which may have interfered with the interpretation of the results were not used in the test.
On the day of treatment, 0.5 mL of the test item was placed on a surgical gauze patch (ca. 4 cm x 4 cm). This gauze patch was applied to the intact skin of the clipped area. The patch was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing. The dressing was wrapped around the abdomen and anchored with tape. The duration of treatment was 4 hours. Then the dressing was removed and the skin was flushed with lukewarm tap water to clean the application site so that any reactions (erythema) were clearly visible at that time.

Examinations:
Viability/Mortality: Daily from delivery of the animals to the termination of test.
Clinical signs: Daily from delivery of the animals to the termination of test.
Body weights: At start of acclimatization, on the day of application and at termination of observation.
No necropsy was performed in the animals sacrificed at termination of observation.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.67
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.67
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 d
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.67
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit skin.
Executive summary:

The primary skin irritation potential of the test item was investigated by topical semi-occlusive application of 0.5 mL to the intact left flank of each of three young adult New Zealand White rabbits. The duration of treatment was four hours. The scoring of skin reactions was performed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, as well as 7 and 10 days after removal of the dressing.

The mean score was calculated across 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal) for each animal for erythema/eschar grades and for oedema grades, separately.

The mean erythema/eschar score of the three animals was 0.67, 1.67 and 0.67, respectively, and the mean oedema score was 0, 0.33 and 0, respectively.

The application to the rabbit skin resulted in mild, early-onset and transient signs of irritation such as erythema, oedema and swelling. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 10 days after treatment, the end of the observation period for all animals. The test item caused no staining of the treated skin. No corrosive effects were noted on the treated skin of any animal at any measuring interval.

Thus, the test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit skin.

Based upon the referred classification criteria (EEC Commission Directive 93/21/EEC of April 27, 1993), ISOPROPYL N-LAUROYLSARCOSINATE is considered to be "not irritating" to rabbit skin.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2002
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
24-02-1987
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identity: ISOPROPYL N-LAUROYLSARCOSINATE
Description: pale yellow liquid
Batch number: 002013
Purity: 92.9 %
Stability of test item: stable under storage conditions
Expiry date: 31-03-2003
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Test system: New Zealand White Rabbit, SPF
Rationale: Recognized by the international guidelines as the recommended test system
Source: Elevage Scientifique des Dombes, Chatillon sur Chalaronne, France
Number of animals per test: 3 (1 m / 2 f)
Age at start of treatment: 10 - 12 weeks

Acclimatization: Under laboratory conditions after health examination. Only animals without any visual signs of illness were used for the study.
Standard Laboratory Conditions: Air-conditioned with target ranges for room temperature 17-23°C, relative humidity 30-70 % and approximately 10-15 air changes per hour. Room temperature and humidity were monitored continuously and values outside of these ranges may have occasionally occurred, usually following room cleaning. These transient variations are considered not to have any influence on the study and, therefore, these data are not reported but are retained at RCC. The animals were provided with an automatically controlled light cycle of 12 hours light and 12 hours dark. Music was played during the light period.
Accommodation: Individually in stainless steel cages equipped with feed hoppers, drinking water bowls, with wood and haysticks for gnawing.
Diet: Pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3418 rabbit maintenance diet ad libitum.
Water: Community tap water ad libitum.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
eyes were not rinsed after treatment
Observation period (in vivo):
72 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
The eyes of the animals were examined one day prior to test item administration. Animals with overt signs of ocular injury or irritation which may have interfered with the interpretation of the results were not used in the test. On the day of treatment, the test item was placed in the conjunctival sac of the left eye of each animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently held together for about one second to prevent loss of test item. The right eye remained untreated and served as the reference control. The treated eyes were not rinsed after instillation.
As it was suspected that the test item might produce irritancy, one single female was treated first. As neither a corrosive effect nor a severe irritant effect was observed after the 1 - and 24-hour examinations, the test was completed using the two remaining animals.

Examinations:
Viability/Mortality: Daily from delivery of the animals to the termination of test.
Clinical signs: Daily from delivery of the animals to the termination of test.
Body weights: At start of acclimatization, on the day of application and at termination of observation.
No necropsy was performed in the animals sacrificed at termination of observation.
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Remarks:
Primary eye irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
13
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit eye.
Executive summary:

The primary eye irritation potential of the test item was investigated by instillation of 0.1 mL into one eye of each of three young adult New Zealand White rabbits. Scoring of irritation effects was performed approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after test item application. The scores of each animal at the following reading times (24, 48 and 72 hours) were used in calculating the respective mean values for each type of lesion. The primary eye irritation score was calculated by totaling the mean cumulative scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours and then dividing the resulting total by the number of data points. The primary eye irritation score was 0.33 (max. 13).

The eye reactions (mean values from 24 to 72 hours) consisted of grade 0 corneal opacity, grade 0 iris lesions, grade 0.33 redness of the conjunctivae and grade 0 chemosis of the conjunctivae.

The instillation into the eye resulted in mild, early-onset and transient ocular changes, such as reddening of the conjunctivae and sclerae, discharge and swelling. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 72 hours after treatment, the end of the observation period for all animals. No abnormal findings were observed in the cornea or iris of any animal at any reading. No corrosion was observed at any of the measuring intervals. No staining of the treated eyes by the test item was observed.

Thus, the test item did not induce significant or irreversible damage to the rabbit eye.

Based upon the referred classification criteria (EEC Commission Directive 93/21/EEC of April 27, 1993), ISOPROPYL N-LAUROYLSARCOSINATE is considered to be "not irritating" to the rabbit eye.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

The test item gave no indications for possible skin irritation/corrosion or eye irritation in experimental animals. Therefore, there is no need for classification and labelling of the test item according to CLP Regulation 1272/2008/EG.