Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 220-135-0 | CAS number: 2638-94-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09 March 2017 - 08 December 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EU Methode B.49 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2012
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4,4'-azobis[4-cyanovaleric] acid
- EC Number:
- 220-135-0
- EC Name:
- 4,4'-azobis[4-cyanovaleric] acid
- Cas Number:
- 2638-94-0
- Molecular formula:
- C12H16N4O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 4,4'-azobis[4-cyanovaleric] acid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Batch No. of test material: 150726 (Test item No.: 16/0252-1)
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 26 July 2018
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Refrigerator
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- human lymphoblastoid cells (TK6)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Suitability of cells: The TK6 cell line had shown its suitability to detect aneugenic effects in the Micronucleus test in vitro either in the absence and presence of CytB.
- Doubling time: about 12 - 14 hours
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture: Deep-frozen cell stocks were thawed at 37°C in a water bath, and volumes of 0.5 mL were transferred into 25 cm2 plastic flasks containing about 5 mL RPMI 1640 medium (containing a L-glutamine source and antibiotics) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FCS. Cells were grown with 5% (v/v) CO2 at 37°C and ≥ 90% relative humidity and subcultured twice weekly.
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 containing a L-glutamine source supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (10000 IU / 10000 μg/mL) and 1% (v/v) amphotericine B (250 μg/mL).
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically 'cleansed' against high spontaneous background: yes
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- Cytochalasin B
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Test concentrations: 0; 78.1; 156.3; 312.5; 625.0; 1250.0; 2500.0 μg/mL
Justification for top dose: 2500 μg/mL (correspond to 2038 μg/mL of the main ingredient) were selected as top dose based on current OECD guidline - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Due to insolubility of the test substance in water, DMSO was selected as vehicle, which has been demonstrated to be suitable in the in vitro cytogenetic assay and for which historical control data are available.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- medium only
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in suspension
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h (experiment I, II and II with S9 mix, experiment I without S9 mix), 24 h (experiment III without S9 mix)
- Recovery time: 20 hours (experiment I and II with S9 mix, experiment I without s9 mix), 40 hours (Experiment III with S9 mix)
- Harvest time: 24 hours (experiment I and II with S9 mix, experiment I and I without S9 mix), 44 hours (experiment II with S9 mix
STAIN: mixture of 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) and propidium iodide
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: Single cell suspensions were prepared from each test group by resuspending. Then, the cell number per flask of each cell suspension was determined using a cell counter. Subsequently, 5x10^4 cells per slide were centrifuged at 600 rpm for 7 minutes onto labeled slides using a Cytospin centrifuge. At least two slides per flask were prepared. In the case of strongly reduced cell numbers no slides were prepared. After drying, the slides were fixed in 90% (v/v) methanol for 10 minutes. Before scoring, the slides were stained with a mixture of DAPI and propidium iodide.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: at least 1000 binucleated cells per culture, in total at least 2000 binucleated cells per test group
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION:
− The diameter of the micronucleus is less than 1/3 of the main nucleus.
− The micronucleus and main nucleus retain the same color.
− The micronucleus is not linked to the main nucleus and is located within the cytoplasm of the cell.
− Only binucleated cells were scored.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI) - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance is considered to be clearly positive if the following criteria are met:
• A statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was obtained.
• A dose-related increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei was observed.
A test substance is considered to be clearly negative if the following criterion is met:
• Neither a statistically significant nor dose-related increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei was observed under any experimental condition. - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of the data was carried out using an appropriate statistical analysis. The proportion of cells containing micronuclei was calculated for each test group. A comparison of the micronucleus rates of each test group with the concurrent vehicle control group was carried out for the hypothesis of equal proportions (i.e. one-sided Fisher's exact test). Furthermore, a statistical trend test (SAS; Proc Reg) was performed to assess a possible doserelated increase of micronucleated cells.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- human lymphoblastoid cells (TK6)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- only in the 2nd Experiment with S9 mix at one concentration level (625.0 μg/mL) reduced cell counts (below 50% of the concurrent vehicle control value) was observed
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: pH values were not influenced by test substance treatment. However, the pH of the stock solutions was prediluted with culture medium and adjusted to a physiological value using small amounts of NaOH.
- Effects of osmolality: Osmolality was not influenced by test substance treatment.
- Water solubility: The test substance was insoluble in water.
- Precipitation: No precipitation of the test substance in culture medium was observed.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: yes, Pretests for choice of vehicle and dose selection
NUMBER OF CELLS WITH MICRONUCLEI
- Number of cells for each treated and control culture: at least 1000 binucleated cells per culture (in total at least 2000 binucleated cells per test group)
- Indication whether binucleate or mononucleate where appropriate: Only binucleated cells were scored.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- Please refer to the field “Any other information on results incl. tables’”
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: CBPI
OTHER:
- The 1st experiment (with S9 mix) was invalid and therefore repeated (2nd experiment).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary table - experimental parts without S9 mix
Exp. |
Exposure/ Preparation interval |
Test groups [µg/mL] |
S9 mix |
Prec.* |
Micro-nucleated cells** [%] |
Cytotoxicity |
|
Proliferation index cytostasis (CBPI) |
Cell count [%] |
||||||
1 |
4/24 |
Vehicle control1 |
- |
n.d. |
0.7 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
78.1 |
- |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
94.4 |
||
156.3 |
- |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
93.8 |
||
312.5 |
- |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
83.9 |
||
625.0 |
- |
- |
0.7 |
3.6 |
75.1 |
||
1250.0 |
- |
- |
1.3 |
9.1 |
81.2 |
||
2500.0 |
- |
- |
1.0 |
-0.4 |
87.7 |
||
Positive control2 |
- |
n.d. |
2.1S |
27.7 |
82.7 |
||
Positive control3 |
- |
n.d. |
4.2S |
51.2 |
83.0 |
||
3 |
24/24 |
Vehicle control1 |
- |
n.d. |
1.1 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
Negative control |
- |
n.d. |
1.3 |
-13.6 |
102.9 |
||
78.1 |
- |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
103.3 |
||
156.3 |
- |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
105.3 |
||
312.5 |
- |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
100.5 |
||
625.0 |
- |
- |
1.1 |
-7.4 |
95.1 |
||
1250.0 |
- |
- |
1.7 |
-5.2 |
105.7 |
||
2500.0 |
- |
- |
1.0 |
9.4 |
101.2 |
||
Positive control4 |
- |
n.d. |
2.4S |
17.4 |
81.3 |
||
Positive control5 |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
88.7 |
* Precipitation in culture medium at the end of exposure period (macroscopic)
** Relative number of binucleated cells with micronuclei per 2000 cells scored per test group
S Frequency statistically significant higher than corresponding control values
n.d. Not determined
n.p. No cytospin slides prepared due to strong cytotoxicity
1 DMSO 1% (v/v)
2 MMC 0.125μg/mL
3 MMC 0.250μg/mL
4 MMC 0.015μg/mL
5 MMC 0.030μg/mL
Table 2: Summary table - experimental parts with S9 mix
Exp. |
Exposure/ Preparation interval |
Test groups [µg/mL] |
S9 mix |
Prec.* |
Micro-nucleated cells** [%] |
Cytotoxicity |
|
Proliferation index cytostasis (CBPI) |
Cell count [%] |
||||||
2 |
4/24 |
Vehicle control1 |
+ |
n.d. |
1.0 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
156.3 |
+ |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
75.1 |
||
312.5 |
+ |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
65.4 |
||
625.0 |
+ |
- |
0.7 |
-12.3 |
41.5 |
||
1250.0 |
+ |
- |
1.4 |
-16.3 |
64.9 |
||
2500.0 |
+ |
- |
1.1 |
-20.0 |
80.5 |
||
Positive control6 |
+ |
n.d. |
2.5S |
-2.4 |
87.3 |
||
Positive control7 |
+ |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
89.3 |
||
3 |
4/44 |
Vehicle control1 |
+ |
n.d. |
1.0 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
156.3 |
+ |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
101.8 |
||
312.5 |
+ |
- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
102.3 |
||
625.0 |
+ |
- |
1.1 |
-4.3 |
97.7 |
||
1250.0 |
+ |
- |
1.4 |
-4.2 |
95.0 |
||
2500.0 |
+ |
- |
1.3 |
-11.5 |
113.8 |
||
Positive control6 |
+ |
n.d. |
2.9S |
1.0 |
126.6 |
||
Positive control7 |
+ |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
119.7 |
* Precipitation in culture medium at the end of exposure period (macroscopic)
** Relative number of binucleated cells with micronuclei per 2000 cells scored per test group
S Frequency statistically significant higher than corresponding control values
n.d. Not determined
n.p. No cytospin slides prepared due to strong cytotoxicity
1 DMSO 1% (v/v)
6 CPP 0.5 μg/mL
7 CPP 1.0 μg/mL
Table 3: Historical negative control data
Cytochalasin B Method, Period: June 2015 – December 2016
Without and with S9 mix – all vehicles* |
|
Micronucleated Cells [%] |
|
Exposure / Sampling period |
4 h / 24 h, 24 h / 24 h |
Mean |
0.7 % |
Minimum |
0.3 % |
Maximum |
1.4 % |
Standard Deviation |
0.28 % |
95% Lower Control Limit |
0.1 % |
95% Upper Control Limit |
1.3 % |
No. of experiments |
43 |
* = culture medium, DMSO 1% (v/v)
Table 4: Historical negative control data - without S9 mix
Cytochalasin B Method, Period: June 2015 - December 2016
Without S9 mix – all vehicles* |
|
Micronucleated Cells [%] |
|
Exposure / Sampling period |
4 h / 24 h & 24 h / 24 h |
Mean |
0.7 % |
Minimum |
0.3 % |
Maximum |
1.4 % |
Standard Deviation |
0.29 % |
95% Lower Control Limit |
0.1 % |
95% Upper Control Limit |
1.3 % |
No. of experiments |
38 |
* = culture medium, DMSO 1% (v/v)
Table 5: Historical negative control data - with S9 mix
Cytochalasin B Method, Period: June 2015 - December 2016
With S9 mix – all vehicles* |
|
Micronucleated Cells [%] |
|
Exposure / Sampling period |
4 h / 24 h |
Mean |
0.9 % |
Minimum |
0.6 % |
Maximum |
1.3 % |
Standard Deviation |
0.25 % |
95% Lower Control Limit |
0.1 % |
95% Upper Control Limit |
1.6 % |
No. of experiments |
5 |
* = culture medium, DMSO 1% (v/v)
Table 6: Historical positive control data - without S9 mix
Cytochalasin B Method, Period: June 2015 - December 2016
Without S9 mix Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.125 – 0.250 μg/mL |
|
Micronucleated Cells [%] |
|
Exposure / Sampling period |
4 h / 24 h |
Mean |
4.3 % |
Minimum |
3.0 % |
Maximum |
6.5 % |
Standard Deviation |
1.68 % |
95% Lower Control Limit |
0.0 % |
95% Upper Control Limit |
10.3 % |
No. of experiments |
4 |
Table 7: Historical positive control data - with S9 mix
Cytochalasin B Method, Period: June 2015 - December 2016
With S9 mix Cyclophosphamide (CPP) 0.625 – 1.250 μg/mL |
|
Micronucleated Cells [%] |
|
Exposure / Sampling period |
4 h / 24 h |
Mean |
2.3 % |
Minimum |
2.0 % |
Maximum |
2.4 % |
Standard Deviation |
0.22 % |
95% Lower Control Limit |
1.2 % |
95% Upper Control Limit |
3.3 % |
No. of experiments |
3 |
95% Control limit (= Prediction interval)
For the control mean the 95% control limit was calculated according to the formulae
Mean ± SD * Sqrt (1/n + 1) * tn-1;0.975
Mean = Mean of the control means
SD = Standard deviation of the control means
n = Number of controls
tn-1;0.975 = t-Quantile with n-1 degrees of freedom
Sqrt = Square root (√)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.