Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 253-775-4 | CAS number: 38083-17-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to terrestrial plants
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
The most sensitive acute effects were observed for the shoot dry weight of Brassica rapa in the chronic test according to ISO 22030 with an EC50 of 15 mg/kg dw.
The most sensitive chronic effects were observed for the number of husks, husk fresh weight and husk dry weight with a NOEC of 6.4 mg/kg dw.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Short-term EC50 or LC50 for terrestrial plants:
- 15 mg/kg soil dw
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for terrestrial plants:
- 6.4 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
The toxicity to terrestrial plants was investigated with two different tests - an acute test and a chronic test.
The chronic and acute toxicity of the test item to Avena sativa (monocots) and Brassica napus (dicots) was tested in a GLP study according to ISO 22030 (key, RL1, 2014) over 63 days (Avena sativa) and 42 days (Brassica rapa). According to the results of a range-finder, the test for the plant species oats was conducted at the test item concentrations 100 - 50 - 25 - 12.5 - 6.25 - 3.13 - 1.56 mg/kg soil dry weight (factor 2) and for the plant species turnip at the test concentrations 100 - 40 - 16 - 6.4 - 2.56 - 1.024 - 0.4096 mg/kg soil dry weight (factor 2.5). The most sensitive endpoint for acute toxicity was determined to be the shoot dry weight of Brassica rapa with an EC50 of 15 mg/kg dw. The most sensitive endpoints for chronic toxicity were determined to be number of husks, husk fresh weight and husk dry weight of Brassica rapa with a NOEC of 6.4 mg/kg dw. Avena sativa was observed to be less sensitive with an EC50 of 29.4 mg/kg dw for shoot dry weight and a most sensitive NOEC (number of blossoms) of 12.5 mg/kg dw.
Furthermore, an acute toxicity test with terrestrial plants was recently published by Richter et al. (2013). Due to the limited details on the study performance a reliability could not be assigned (RL4). In the short-term study according to ISO 11269 -2 two differnt terrestrial plants were tested in two differnt soils over 17 days. The most sensitive endpoint for Avena sativa is the biomass yield with an EC50 of 18.5 mg/kg dw tested in LUFA 2.3 soil. For Brassica napus the most sensitive endpoint is as well the biomass yield with an EC50 of 30.7 mg/kg dw tested in LUFA 2.3 soil. In the LUFA 2.3 soil with a higher soil pH of 6.8 a higher toxicity of the test item to both plants was observed, compared to the results obtained in the test with artificial soil with a pH of 6.0.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.