Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 619-596-4 | CAS number: 915095-86-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 02 Aug 2007 - 06 Dec 2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- OECD Guideline 471
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
- Report date:
- 2007
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (2-chloro-5-iodophenyl)(4-fluorophenyl)methanone
- EC Number:
- 619-596-4
- Cas Number:
- 915095-86-2
- Molecular formula:
- C13 H7 Cl F I O
- IUPAC Name:
- (2-chloro-5-iodophenyl)(4-fluorophenyl)methanone
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- BI 10773 Fluorid was a white powder.Purity was stated as 100 %. It was received on
25 July 2007 and was stored at room temperature in the dark with desiccant.
Method
- Target gene:
- Four strains of Salmonella typhimurium bacteria (TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537) and
one strain of Escherichia coli bacteria (WP2 uvrA pKM101) were used in this study. All
strains were bought from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc., St. Louis, Missouri USA.
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1: concentrations of BI 10773 Fluorid at 5, 16, 50, 160, 500, 1600 and 5000 μg/plate
Experiment 2 : The maximum test concentration of 5000 μg/plate was retained for all
strains. Narrowed concentration intervals were employed covering the range
80-5000 μg/plate,
Experiment 3: treatments of strains TA98, TA1535 and TA1537, TA100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A were performed in the
absence of S-9 using pre-incubation methodology. The maximum test concentration was reduced to 625 μg/plate based on toxicity observed in Experiment 2. Narrowed
concentrations intervals were employed covering the range 300-625 μg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (AAN), 2-nitrofluorene, sodium azide, 9-aminoacridine, methyl methanesulfonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The test system was suitably labelled to clearly identify the study number, bacterial strain,
test article concentration (where appropriate), positive and vehicle controls, absence or
presence of S-9 mix. - Rationale for test conditions:
- The assay was to be considered valid if the following criteria were met:
1. The vehicle control counts fell within the laboratory’s historical control ranges as defined
in Appendix 1.
2. The positive control chemicals induced increases in revertant numbers of ≥2-fold (in
strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrA pKM101) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 and The assay was to be considered valid if the following criteria were met:
1. The vehicle control counts fell within the laboratory’s historical control ranges as defined
in Appendix 1.
2. The positive control chemicals induced increases in revertant numbers of ≥2-fold (in
strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrA pKM101) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 and The assay was to be considered valid if the following criteria were met:
1. The vehicle control counts fell within the laboratory’s historical control ranges as defined
in Appendix 1.
2. The positive control chemicals induced increases in revertant numbers of ≥2-fold (in
strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrA pKM101) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 and TA1537) the concurrent vehicle control confirming discrimination between different strains, and an active S-9 preparation
3. At least five analysable concentrations of the test article are available. - Evaluation criteria:
- For valid data, the test article was considered to be mutagenic if:
1. A concentration related increase in revertant numbers was ≥2-fold (in strains TA98,
TA100 or, WP2 uvrA pKM101) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 or TA1537) the concurrent
vehicle control values
2. Any observed response is reproducible.
The test article was considered positive in this assay if both of the above criteria were met.
The test article was considered negative in this assay if neither of the above criteria were met.
Results which only partially satisfied the above criteria were dealt with on a case-by-case
basis. Biological relevance was taken into account, for example consistency of response
within and between concentrations and (where applicable) between experiments. - Statistics:
- Individual plate counts were recorded separately and the mean and standard deviation of the
plate counts for each treatment were determined. Control counts were compared with the
laboratory’s historical control ranges (Appendix 1). Data were considered
acceptable if the vehicle control counts fell within the calculated historical control ranges and
the positive control plate counts were comparable with the historical control ranges.
The presence or otherwise of a concentration response was checked by non-statistical
analysis, up to limiting levels (for example toxicity, precipitation or 5000 μg/plate).
However, adequate interpretation of biological relevance was of critical importance.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Precipitate was observed beginning at 500 or at 1500 microgram per plate
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Precipitate was observed beginning at 1500 or at 5000 microgram per plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Precipitate was observed beginning at 500 or at 1500 microgram per plate
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Precipitate was observed beginning at 1500 or at 5000 microgram per plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
All criteria for a valid study were met. IN00078280 did not cause a positive mutagenic response
with any of the tester strains in either the presence or absence of S9 activation.
Under the conditions of this study, IN00078280 was concluded to be negative in the Bacterial
Reverse Mutation Assay when tested up to maximum recommended concentrations.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- It was concluded that IN 00078280/ BI 10773 Fluorid did not induce mutation in four histidine-requiring strains of
Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537) and one tryptophan-
requiring strain of Escherichia coli (WP2 uvrA pKM101) when tested under the conditions of this
study using the plate incorporation and pre-incubation methodologies. These conditions
included treatments at concentrations up cytotoxic concentrations and/or to 5000 μg/plate
(the maximum recommended concentration according to current regulatory guidelines), and
testing in the absence and in the presence of a rat liver metabolic activation system (S-9). - Executive summary:
The test article, IN 00078280, was tested in the IN 00078280: Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay
using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and
Escherichia coli tester strain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver
S9. The assay was performed in two phases, using the plate incorporation method. The first
phase, the initial toxicity-mutation assay, was used to establish the dose-range for the
confirmatory mutagenicity assay and to provide a preliminary mutagenicity evaluation. The
second phase, the confirmatory mutagenicity assay, was used to evaluate and confirm the
mutagenic potential of the test article.
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was selected as the solvent of choice based on the solubility of the
test article and compatibility with the target cells. The test article formed a soluble and clear
solution in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at approximately 500 mg/mL, the highest concentration
tested.
In the initial toxicity-mutation assay, the maximum dose tested was 5000 µg per plate; this dose
was achieved using a concentration of 100 mg/mL and a 50 uL plating aliquot. The dose levels
tested were 1.5, 5.0, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 ug per plate, In the initial
toxicity-mutation assay, no positive mutagenic response was observed. Precipitate was
observed beginning at 1500 or at 5000 ug per plate. No appreciable toxicity was observed.
Based on the findings of the initial toxicity-mnutation assay, the maximum dose plated in the
confirmatory mutagenicity assay was 5000 µg per plate.
In the confirmatory mutagenicity assay, no positive mutagenic response was observed. The
dose levels tested were 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 ug per plate. Precipitate was observed
beginning at 500 or 1500 ug per plate. No background lawn toxicity was observed.
Under the conditions of this study, test article IN 00078280 was concluded to be negative in the
IN 00078280: Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.