Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP and OECD guideline compliant study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Version / remarks:
(February 24, 1987)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
(Bioassay Labor für biologische Analytik,GmbH, Heidelberg)
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl dodecanoate
EC Number:
700-503-1
Cas Number:
101238-01-1
Molecular formula:
C21 H41 N O2
IUPAC Name:
2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl dodecanoate
Details on test material:
- Analytical purity: 94%

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Wiga GmbH, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: male animals approx.8 weeks, female animals approx. 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation:
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: single housing in Makrolon cages, type III
- Diet: VRF1(P); SDS Special Diets Services, Altrip, Germany
- Water: tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22°C ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 30 – 70%
- Air changes (per hr): approx. 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h / 12 h

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: clipped epidermis (dorsal and dorsolateral parts of the trunk)
- % coverage: at least 10% of the body surface
- Type of wrap if used: The test item was covered with an air-permeable dressing (4 layers of absorbent gauze (Ph. Eur. supplied by Lohmann GmbH & Co., KG) and stretch bandage (Fixomull® Stretch (adhesive fleece) supplied by Beiersdorf AG).

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes (with warm water)
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2.24 mL/kg bw

Duration of exposure:
24 h
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
not required
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Individual body weights shortly before administration (day 0), weekly thereafter and on the last day of
observation. Recording of clinical signs several times on the day of administration, and at least once daily thereafter each workday for the individual animals. Individual readings 30 – 60 minutes after removal of the semi-occlusive dressing (day 1), weekly thereafter and on the last day of observation. A check for any dead or moribund animals was made at least once each workday.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
Statistics:
Calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel 2003 and checked with a calculator.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: No mortality and no adverse findings upon necropsy occurred. Local irritation was observed.
Mortality:
No mortality occurred.
Clinical signs:
other: No systemic clinical signs were observed during clinical examination. Skin effects at the application site comprised well-defined erythema (grade 2) in all male animals 1 day after application which persisted in one animal until study day 2. This animal s
Gross pathology:
No macroscopic pathologic abnormalities were noted in the animals (5 males and 5 females) examined on the last day of observation.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: BODY WEIGHTS

Dose (mg/kg bw):

2000

Sex:

male

Administration:

1

Animal No.:

1

2

3

4

5

Mean weight

Standard deviation

Body weight at study day (g):

 

0

245

238

225

240

238

237,2

7,4

7

256

257

241

272

256

256,4

10,97

14

292

283

265

300

290

286

13,21

Dose (mg/kg bw):

2000

Sex:

female

Administration:

1

Animal No.:

1

2

3

4

5

Mean weight

Standard deviation

Body weight at study day (g):

 

0

210

200

204

206

201

204,2

4,02

7

212

200

209

205

197

204,6

6,19

14

228

209

216

213

203

213,8

9,31

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU