Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 26 Mar to 16 Apr 2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021
Report date:
2021

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSens™ test method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSens™ test method

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(S)-tert-butyl 5'-(5-(3,5-dichloro-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydroisoxazol-3-yl)-3'H-spiro[azetidine-3,1'-isobenzofuran]-1-carboxylate
Cas Number:
1398610-06-4
Molecular formula:
C25H22Cl2F4N2O4
IUPAC Name:
(S)-tert-butyl 5'-(5-(3,5-dichloro-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydroisoxazol-3-yl)-3'H-spiro[azetidine-3,1'-isobenzofuran]-1-carboxylate
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Batch No.: 465884
Purity: 100%

In vitro test system

Details of test system:
Keratinoses transgenic cell line [442D]
Details on the study design:
PREPARATION OF TEST SOLUTIONS
- Preparation of the test chemical stock solution
The test item was dissolved in DMSO to a final concentration of 200 mM (orange solution). The stock solution was treated with ultrasonic waves until the test item had completely dissolved. The 100-fold dilution in DMEM glutamax of 200, 100, 50, 25, 13, 6.3 and 3.1 mM showed moderate precipitate and were therefore not suitable to test. The 100-fold dilution of the 1.6 mM DMSO stock showed slight precipitation. This concentration was selected as highest concentration for the main assay (limit of solubility).
- Preparation of the test chemical serial dilutions
In the main experiments the test item was dissolved in DMSO at 1.6 mM (clear colourless
solution). From this stock 11 spike solutions in DMSO were prepared (2-fold dilution series).
The stock and spike solutions were diluted 25-fold with exposure medium. These solutions
were diluted 4-fold with exposure medium in the assay resulting in final test concentrations of
16, 7.8, 3.9, 2.0, 0.98, 0.49, 0.24, 0.12, 0.061, 0.031, 0.015 and 0.008 μM (final concentration
DMSO of 1%).
- Preparation of the positive controls
The positive control used in the case of KeratinoSensTM is Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate
(Sigma, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands), for which a 2-fold dilution series ranging from 0.78
to 25 mM were prepared in DMSO and diluted as described in paragraph 4.4.1, so that the
final concentration of the positive control ranges from 7.8 to 250 μM (final concentration
DMSO of 1%).
- Preparation of the solvent, vehicle and negative controls
The vehicle control was 1% DMSO in exposure medium. Eighteen wells were tested per plate.
On each plate three blank wells were tested (no cells and no treatment).

APPLICATION OF THE TEST CHEMICAL AND CONTROL SUBSTANCES
- Number of replicates: 3
- Number of repetitions: 2
- Test chemical concentrations
- Application procedure
- Exposure time: 48 hours
- Study evaluation and decision criteria used
A KeratinoSensTM prediction is considered positive if the following 4 conditions are all met in
2 of 2 or in the same 2 of 3 repetitions, otherwise the KeratinoSensTM prediction is considered
negative:
1. The Imax is equal or higher than (≥) 1.5-fold and statistically significantly different as
compared to the vehicle (negative) control (as determined by a two-tailed, unpaired
Student’s t-test)
2. The cellular viability is higher than (>) 70% at the lowest concentration with induction
of luciferase activity ≥ 1.5-fold (i.e. at the EC1.5 determining concentration)
3. The EC1.5 value is less than (<) 1000 μM (or < 200 μg/mL for test chemicals with no
defined MW)
4. There is an apparent overall dose-response for luciferase induction
Negative results obtained with concentrations <1000 μM or 200 μg/mL and which do not
reach cytotoxicity (< 70% viability) at the maximal tested concentration should be considered
as inconclusive.
- Description on study acceptance criteria
a) The luciferase activity induction obtained with the positive control, Ethylene glycol
dimethacrylate, should be statistically significant equal or above the threshold of 1.5
in at least one of the tested concentrations (from 7.8 to 250 μM).
b) The EC1.5 of the positive control should be within two standard deviations of the
historical mean. Moreover, the induction for Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate at 250
μM should be higher than 2-fold. If the latter criterion is not fulfilled, the doseresponse
of Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate should be carefully checked, and tests may
be accepted only if there is a clear dose-response with increasing luciferase activity
induction at increasing concentrations for the positive control.
c) Finally, the average coefficient of variation of the luminescence reading for the
vehicle (negative) control DMSO should be below 20% in each repetition which
consists of 18 wells tested. If the variability is higher, results should be discarded.
If the variability is higher, a maximum of three of the eighteen wells may be excluded
based on the Dixon’s Q-test. If the variability is still higher, the results should be
discarded.

LUCIFERASE ACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS
The Steady-Glo Luciferase Assay Buffer (10 mL) and Steady-Glo Luciferase Assay Substrate
(lyophilized) from Promega (Leiden, The Netherlands) were mixed together. The assay plates
were removed from the incubator and the medium is removed. Then 200 μL of the Steady-
Glo Luciferase substrate solution (prior to addition 1:1 mixed with exposure medium) was
added to each well. The plates were shaken for at least 5 minutes at room temperature. Plates
with the cell lysates were placed in the TECAN Infinite® M200 Pro Plate Reader to assess
the quantity of luciferase (integration time two seconds).

DATA EVALUATION
- Cytotoxicity assessment
For the KeratinoSensTM cell viability assay, medium was replaced after the 48 hour exposure
time with fresh DMEM Glutamax containing MTT and cells were incubated for 3 - 4 hours at 37°C ± 1.0°C in the presence of 5% CO2. The MTT medium was then removed and cells were
lysed overnight by adding 10% SDS solution to each well. After shaking, the absorption was measured at 570 nm with the TECAN Infinite® M200 Pro Plate Reader.
Vehicle / solvent control:
DMSO
Negative control:
not applicable
Positive control:
EGDMA (120 M) [442D]

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Experiment 1
The positive control Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate caused a dose related induction of
the luciferase activity. The Imax was 3.58 and the EC1.5 42 μM.
Experiment 2
The positive control Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate caused a dose related induction of
the luciferase activity. The Imax was 3.57 and the EC1.5 34 μM.

In vitro / in chemico

Resultsopen allclose all
Group:
test chemical
Run / experiment:
run/experiment 1
Parameter:
Imax [442D]
Value:
1.3
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Group:
test chemical
Run / experiment:
run/experiment 2
Parameter:
Imax [442D]
Value:
1.6
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Outcome of the prediction model:
data inconclusive
Other effects / acceptance of results:
Experiment 1
• No precipitation was observed at the start and end of the incubation period in the 96-well
plates.
• The test item showed no toxicity. The viability of the cells was higher than 70% at all test
concentrations and therefore no IC30 and IC50 values could be calculated.
• No luminescence activity induction compared to the vehicle control was observed at any
of the test concentrations after treatment with the test item. The Imax was 1.30 and
therefore no EC1.5 could be calculated.

Experiment 2
• No precipitation was observed at the start and end of the incubation period in the 96-well
plates.
• The test item showed no toxicity. The viability of the cells was higher than 70% at all test
concentrations and therefore no IC30 and IC50 values could be calculated.
• A non-dose related luminescence activity induction was observed after treatment with the
test item. The Imax was 1.60 and the EC1.5 0.82 μM (as result of a fluctuation). Since this
was a clear outlier compared to the other dose levels in this experiment and the results
observed in the first experiment, it is likely the fluctuation was caused by an incidental
fluctuation and therefore considered not biologically relevant.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: inconclusive
Conclusions:
The test item showed no toxicity (no IC30 and IC50 value) in both experiments. No
biologically relevant induction of the luciferase activity (no EC1.5 value) was measured at any
of the test concentrations in the first experiment. An induction of the luciferase activity (EC1.5
value of 0.82 μM) was measured in the second experiment as result of a fluctuation up to an
Imax of 1.60-fold. Since this was a clear outlier compared to the other dose levels in this
experiment and the results observed in the first experiment, it is likely the fluctuation was
caused by an incidental fluctuation and therefore considered not biologically relevant. The
maximum luciferase activity induction (Imax) was 1.30-fold and 1.60-fold in experiment 1 and
2 respectively. The test item is classified as inconclusive in the KeratinoSensTM assay since
negative results (<1.5-fold induction; excluding the outlier value in the second experiment)
were observed at test concentrations < 1000 μM with a cell viability of >70% compared to the
vehicle control.