Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 458-430-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation assay / Ames test): negative with and without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (OECD TG 471) (Genetic Laboratory, JBC Inc., 1994).
Cytogenicity in mammalian
cells: positive with metabolic activation in Chinese hamster lung
fibroblasts (similar to OECD 473) (Hita laboratories, 1996). Although
induction of chromosomal aberration was not reported in the study
without metabolic activation, structural
aberrations at 500-800 µg/ml and
numerical aberrations at 500 µg/ml in 18-h recovery the group were
observed when tested in the presence of metabolic activation.
Chromosomal aberrations were induced by the treatment with the positive
control substances, mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide. No concurrent
cytotoxicity data are presented in the report. The pre-experiment for
toxicity showed a reduction of mitotic index to approximately 50% at 500
µg/ml. The aberrations observed at 800 µg/ml are very possibly the
result of excessive toxicity, and it is possible that the 500 µg/ml
results are also a result of toxicity. Therefore, it is not possible to
fully evaluate the results.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 22 July - 19 August 1994
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 472 (Genetic Toxicology: Escherichia coli, Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Standards for Mutagenicity Test using Microorganisms (JMOL)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Guidelines for Screening Toxicity Testing of Chemicals and Guidelines for Toxicity Testing of Chemicals (JMITI)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- tryptophan (E. coli strain) and histidine (Salmonella strains)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone, S9 induced rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary test: 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000 µg/plate
Main test: 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: test substance was found to be soluble in DMSO and acetone, but not in water. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: AF-2; 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
- Remarks:
- -MA: TA 100, WP2 uvrA - 0.01 µg/plate; TA 98 - 0.1 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- -MA: TA 1535 - 0.5 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- -MA: TA 1537 - 80.0 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-AA (2-Aminoanthracene)
- Remarks:
- +MA: TA 1535 - 2.0 µg/plate; WP2 uvrA - 10.0 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- +MA: TA 100, TA 98, TA 1537 - 5.0 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- ACTIVATION:
S9 mix per ml:
S9 fraction: 10 v/v%
MgCl2: 8 µmol
KCl: 33 µmol
G-6-P: 5 µmol
NADPH: 4 µmol
NADH: 4 µmol
0.5 ml S9 mix was added to a total volume of 2.7 ml, giving a final concentration of approximately 2% S9.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 37°C for 48 hours
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): minimum glucose agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicate plates, experiment repeated
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- increase in number of revertant colonies - Evaluation criteria:
- The number of revertant colonies of each test group were compared with and analysed for a statistically significant increase (p<0.01) from that of the negative control group at each dose in each bacterial strain with and without metabolic activation.
- Statistics:
- Dunnett's multiple comparison (one-sided test)
Linear regression - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Observations:
The test substance produced neither toxic effects nor a statistically significant increase in the number of revertant colonies in any conditions in any bacterial strains.
All of the positive controls produced significant increases in the number of revertant colonies in all bacterial strains with and without metabolic activation. This shows the test method employed in the test is effective for the purpose. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- The test substance has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria, in a study which was conducted according to the OECD TG 471 and 472 and in compliant with GLP. No evidence of a test-substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 or E. coli WP2 uvrA in the initial or the repeat experiments up to limit concentrations. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- The restrictions were that the number of cells evaluated does not comply with the current guideline. An audited translation from Japanese was available to the reviewer, date of translation November 12 1998.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- Annex V (In Vitro Cytogenetics)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The number of cells evaluated does not comply with the current guideline. Concurrent cytogenicity data are not included in the study report.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese Hamster Lung fibroblasts (CHL cells; clone 11)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 and 2: 25, 50, 100 µg/ml
(without metabolic activation); 200, 500, 800 µg/ml (with metabolic activation)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- ACTIVATION: S9 mix included magnesium chloride, potassium chloride, Glucose-6-phosphate and NADP
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6 hours (with metabolic activation); 24 and 48 hours (without metabolic activation)
Fixation time:
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 and 48 hours, with and without metabolic activation
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate cultures, experiment repeated
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: chromosome aberrations were evaluated in 200 metaphases per concentration; mitotic index was determined from 100 cells per concentration
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes - Evaluation criteria:
- Structural aberrations (not including gaps) compared with negative control and judged to be: negative if incidence not increased with a significance level of 5%; positive if incidence not increased with a significance level of 5% and results reproducible.
- Statistics:
- Fischer's exact probability test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese Hamster Lung fibroblasts (CHL cells; clone 11)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- mitotic index reduced to approximately 50% of control at 500 µg/ml in the preliminary cytotoxicity study
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese Hamster Lung fibroblasts (CHL cells; clone 11)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- mitotic index reduced to approximately 20% (18 h recovery) or 50% (48 hour recovery) of control at 100 µg/ml in the preliminary cytotoxicity study
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The preliminary cell growth and cell division inhibition test indicated that without metabolic activation 50% growth inhibition occurred at about 85 µg/ml (6 h exposure); at about 75 µg/ml (24 h exposure) and at about 65 µg/ml (48 h exposure); with metabolic activation 50% growth inhibition occurred at about 500 µg/ml.
Observations: The number of cells with numerical aberrations (polyploidy and endoreduplication) and chromatid type or chromosome type of structural aberration (gap ,break, exchange, etc.) was counted by observing 50 cells per slide and total 200 metaphases per each concentrations, and each incidence of the cells with the numerical and/or structural aberration was recorded. Total incidence of the cells with any aberration in each concentration was recorded in 2 ways of inclusion of gap or not. A gap was defined as a clear discontinuity, wider than one chromatid but narrower than two, accompanied with a minimal misalignment of the chromatid. Slides were all coded and blind-tested by microscopy. The mitotic rates for each group, except for the positive control, were calculated from the results of observation of 500 cells per dish, to make a total of 1000 cells per concentration. - Conclusions:
- The substance has been tested for cytogenicity in mammalian cells in a study conducted according to a Japanese guideline similar to OECD 473 and in compliance with GLP. A statistically significant dose-dependent increase in the number of cells with structural aberrations and with polyploidy was observed in the presence of metabolic activation with 18 hours recovery in the initial and the repeat experiment. In cultures treated in the presence of metabolic activation with a 42 hours recovery period, no increase in structural aberrations was observed, though a statistically significant increase in polyploidy was reported at the highest dose tested. Only preliminary cytotoxicity data are available, so it is not possible to evaluate whether the increase in numerical aberration was a result of toxicity. No increase in numerical or structural aberrations was reported in the absence of metabolic activation. It is concluded that the test substance may be positive for cytogenicity under the conditions of the test.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Preliminary test - number of revertants per plate (mean of 2 plates)
Dose (µg/plate) |
TA 100 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1535 |
WP2 uvrA |
WP2 uvrA |
TA 98 |
TA 98 |
TA 1537 |
TA 1537 |
|
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
DMSO |
133 |
124 |
9 |
11 |
28 |
31 |
26 |
29 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
133 |
115 |
9 |
13 |
24 |
30 |
26 |
27 |
8 |
12 |
50 |
126 |
120 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
29 |
26 |
34 |
8 |
9 |
100 |
123 |
116 |
8 |
14 |
30 |
35 |
20 |
30 |
7 |
12 |
500 |
135 |
133 |
9 |
14 |
23 |
32 |
21 |
36 |
9 |
9 |
1000 |
127 |
139 |
12 |
10 |
30 |
32 |
22 |
27 |
6 |
10 |
5000 |
126 |
138 |
14 |
10 |
29 |
36 |
27 |
36 |
5 |
5 |
Positive control |
372 |
1227 |
301 |
413 |
99 |
733 |
497 |
277 |
730 |
53 |
Table 2: Main test 1 - number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
Dose (µg/plate) |
TA 100 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1535 |
WP2 uvrA |
WP2 uvrA |
TA 98 |
TA 98 |
TA 1537 |
TA 1537 |
|
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
DMSO |
117 |
128 |
11 |
12 |
29 |
30 |
20 |
24 |
6 |
10 |
313 |
110 |
137 |
13 |
14 |
27 |
37 |
22 |
25 |
5 |
7 |
625 |
110 |
142 |
11 |
11 |
24 |
37 |
23 |
29 |
6 |
8 |
1250 |
111 |
128 |
9 |
12 |
29 |
31 |
21 |
32 |
8 |
8 |
2500 |
110 |
128 |
11 |
14 |
25 |
35 |
27 |
30 |
5 |
8 |
5000 |
116 |
116 |
10 |
12 |
27 |
37 |
23 |
25 |
5 |
6 |
Positive control |
354 |
1178 |
285 |
444 |
85 |
818 |
457 |
273 |
990 |
55 |
Table 3: Main test 2 - number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
Dose (µg/plate) |
TA 100 |
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1535 |
WP2 uvrA |
WP2 uvrA |
TA 98 |
TA 98 |
TA 1537 |
TA 1537 |
|
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
DMSO |
115 |
122 |
11 |
12 |
25 |
33 |
2.5 |
28 |
7 |
11 |
313 |
112 |
121 |
10 |
11 |
29 |
34 |
2.3 |
31 |
8 |
10 |
625 |
124 |
135 |
9 |
12 |
30 |
36 |
1.5 |
30 |
8 |
8 |
1250 |
107 |
136 |
9 |
14 |
22 |
34 |
3.0 |
29 |
6 |
8 |
2500 |
119 |
117 |
9 |
10 |
27 |
33 |
6.0 |
23 |
8 |
9 |
5000 |
113 |
122 |
11 |
9 |
28 |
32 |
1.5 |
26 |
9 |
7 |
Positive control |
438 |
1334 |
223 |
437 |
111 |
1087 |
456 |
273 |
1077 |
56 |
Although induction of chromosomal aberration was not reported in the study without metabolic activation, structural aberrations at 500-800 µg/ml and numerical aberrations at 500 µg/ml in 18-h recovery the group were observed when tested in the presence of metabolic activation. Chromosomal aberrations were induced by the treatment with the positive control substances, mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide. No concurrent cytotoxicity data are presented in the report. The pre-experiment for toxicity showed a reduction of mitotic index to approximately 50% at 500 µg/ml. The aberrations observed at 800 µg/ml are very possibly the result of excessive toxicity, and it is possible that the 500 µg/ml results are also a result of toxicity. Therefore, it is not possible to fully evaluate the results.
Table 1: Results of the dose range finding test Direct method (without metabolic activation)
Concentration of test substance (µg/ml) |
Cell growth rate |
Cell growth rate |
Mitotic rate |
Mitotic rate |
|
24 h-treatment |
48 h-treatment |
24 h-treatment |
48 h-treatment |
0 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
20 |
94.9 |
102.8 |
92.7 |
80.0 |
40 |
89.0 |
120.4 |
122.0 |
91.4 |
60 |
86.9 |
105.1 |
129.3 |
57.1 |
80 |
39.4 |
31.2 |
65.9 |
54.3 |
100 |
22.0 |
16.8 |
22.0 |
51.4 |
200 |
14.5 |
14.4 |
9.8 |
34.3 |
300 |
16.1 |
2.5 |
- |
11.4 |
500 |
17.7 |
3.3 |
- |
- |
1000 |
11.5 |
3.2 |
- |
- |
Table 2: Results of the dose range finding test (with and without metabolic activation
Concentration of test substance (µg/ml) |
Cell growth rate |
Cell growth rate |
Cell growth rate |
Mitotic rate |
Mitotic rate |
Mitotic rate |
|
-MA 18 h-recovery |
+MA 18 h-recover |
+MA 42 h-recovery |
-MA 18 h-recovery |
+MA 18 h-recover |
+MA 42 h-recovery |
0 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
40 |
94.0 |
- |
- |
92.6 |
- |
- |
60 |
93.6 |
- |
- |
81.5 |
- |
- |
80 |
60.0 |
- |
- |
74.1 |
- |
- |
100 |
22.1 |
90.7 |
96.8 |
44.1 |
90.7 |
80.9 |
200 |
6.4 |
89.5 |
93.5 |
- |
89.5 |
104.3 |
300 |
3.0 |
82.9 |
78.0 |
- |
82.9 |
89.4 |
500 |
3.4 |
54.2 |
51.1 |
- |
54.2 |
87.2 |
800 |
1.3 |
10.5 |
20.9 |
- |
10.5 |
48.9 |
1000* |
2.1 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
- |
- |
- |
1500* |
- |
0.9 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
2000* |
- |
0.6 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
3000* |
- |
0.9 |
0.4 |
- |
- |
- |
*precipitation of the test substance was observed
Table 3: Results of chromosome aberration test (first trial, without metabolic activation)
Treatment time (h) |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Number of polyploid cells |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
|
|
|
-g |
+g |
24 |
Solvent control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
Solvent control |
0 |
1 |
1 |
24 |
25 50 100 |
2 2 3 |
5* 2 1 |
5* 2 1 |
48 |
25 50 100 |
0 1 6* |
2 0 2 |
2 1 2 |
24 |
Positive control |
0 |
113 |
114 |
48 |
Positive control |
1 |
129 |
130 |
* significant at p < 0.05
Table 4: Results of chromosome aberration test (first trial, with and without metabolic activation)
S9 mix |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Number of polyploid cells |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
|
|
|
-g |
+g |
-MA |
Solvent control |
0 |
1 |
1 |
+MA 18 h-recovery |
Solvent control |
0 |
1 |
1 |
-MA |
25 50 100 |
0 0 0 |
2 1 2 |
2 2 2 |
+MA 18 h-recovery |
200 500 800 |
1 16** 5* |
0 41** 51** |
0 42** 54** |
- |
Positive control |
1 |
104 |
105 |
+MA 18 h-recovery |
Positive control |
2 |
70 |
72 |
* significant at p < 0.05
* * significant at p < 0.01
Table 5: Results of chromosome aberration test (first trial, with metabolic activation)
S9 mix |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Number of polyploid cells |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
|
|
|
-g |
+g |
+MA 42 h-recovery |
Solvent control |
0 |
1 |
1 |
+MA 42 h-recovery |
200 500 800 |
3 3 3 |
0 2 4 |
0 2 4 |
+ 42 h-recovery |
Positive control |
1 |
8 |
8 |
Table 6: Results of chromosome aberration test (second trial, without metabolic activation)
Treatment time (h) |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Number of polyploid cells |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
|
|
|
-g |
+g |
24 |
Solvent control |
0 |
2 |
3 |
48 |
Solvent control |
3 |
2 |
2 |
24 |
25 50 100 |
2 0 0 |
2 1 3 |
2 1 3 |
48 |
25 50 100 |
1 0 0 |
1 0 0 |
1 0 0 |
24 |
Positive control |
0 |
105 |
105 |
48 |
Positive control |
0 |
85 |
87 |
Table 7: Results of chromosome aberration test (second trial, with and without metabolic activation)
S9 mix |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Number of polyploid cells |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
Percentage cells with aberrations |
|
|
|
-g |
+g |
-MA |
Solvent control |
1 |
1 |
1 |
+MA 18 h-recovery |
Solvent control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-MA |
25 50 100 |
1 1 1 |
3 1 0 |
4 1 0 |
+MA 18 h-recovery |
200 500 800 |
1 26** 17** |
10 54** 55** |
11 57** 56** |
-MA |
Positive control |
1 |
90 |
90 |
+MA 18 h-recovery |
Positive control |
0 |
88 |
89 |
** significant at p < 0.01
Table 8: Results of chromosome aberration test (second trial, with metabolic activation)
S9 mix |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Number of polyploid cells |
Percentage of cells with aberrations |
Percentage of cells with aberrations |
|
|
|
-g |
+g |
+MA 42 h-recovery |
Solvent control |
4 |
2 |
2 |
+MA 42 h-recovery |
200 500 800 |
0 4 13* |
4 6 3 |
4 6 3 |
+MA 42 h-recovery |
Positive control |
3 |
10 |
10 |
* significant at p < 0.05
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Micronucleus assay in ICR mouse (oral administration): negative (OECD 474) (Korea Institute of Toxicology, 2004).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 29 June 2004 to 16 July 2004
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Orient C., Ltd., Seoul, Korea
- Age at study initiation: six weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 23.5-27.0 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: using algorithm of Path/Tox so that each group had similar body weight distribution
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: up to six animals per cage in polycarbonate cages with bedding
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23°C ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 50%
- Air changes (per hr): 10-20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: mid-May 2004 To: July 8 2004 - Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: olive oil
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: test item is insoluble in water
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: no information
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal): no information. It is not stated if administration was by gavage, but this is presumed to be the case - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- Two treatments at 24 hour intervals
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw
Basis: - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Six males
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Positive control substance: cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): widely used in micronucleus assays
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 70 mg/kg bw - Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: preliminary toxicity study
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields): animals were sacrificed 24 hours after the second administration
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: cells were collected in fetal bovine serum, centrifuged and smeared onto slides. Preparations were dried and fixed by submerging in methanol. Slides were stained with May-Grunwald and Giesma stains, then rinsed dried and mounted.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Slides were examined under x1000 magnification. Small round or oval bodies (1/5 to 1/20 diameter of PCE) were counted as micronuclei. Micronuclei were counted in 200 PCE's. The (PCE):(PCE+NCE) ratio was calculated by counting 500 cells - Evaluation criteria:
- The result was judged as positive if there was a statistically significant and dose-related increase or a reproducible increase in the frequency of MNPCEs at least at one dose level.
- Statistics:
- Differences of numbers of MNPCRs between treated and vehicle control: Kruskal-Wallis' H-test and Dunnett's test.
Differences of numbers of MNPCRs between positive and vehicle control: Mann-Whitney's U-test.
Differences of PCE/(PCE+NCE) between treated and vehicle control: - Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Remarks:
- No effects observed in bone marrow, and no clinical signs were noted
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The test substance has been tested in an in vivo micronucleus assay conducted according to OECD 474 and in compliance with GLP. No evidence of induction of micronuclei was observed in male ICR mice. No signs of systemic toxicity were observed and the test item did not cause toxicity in the bone marrow. Solvent and positive controls gave expected responses. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of micronuclei under the conditions of the study.
Reference
Table 1: Micronucleus test in male ICR mice
Chemical treated |
Dose (mg/kg) |
No. of animals |
MNPCE/2000 PCEs |
PCE/(PCE+NCE) |
Vehicle |
0 |
6 |
1.17 |
0.52 |
Test item |
500 |
6 |
1.33 |
0.49 |
Test item |
1000 |
6 |
1.83 |
0.55 |
Test item |
2000 |
6 |
2.00 |
0.55 |
CPA |
70 |
6 |
94.83** |
0.45* |
* Significantly different from the control at P <0.01
** Significantly different from the control at P < 0.05
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The submission substance has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria, in a study which was conducted according to the OECD TG 471 and OECD TG 472 and in compliance with GLP (Genetic Laboratory, JBC Inc., 1994). No evidence of a test-substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 or E. coli WP2 uvrA in the initial or the repeat experiments up to limit concentrations. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
The submission substance has been tested for cytogenicity in mammalian cells in a study conducted according to a Japanese guideline similar to OECD TG 473 and in compliance with GLP using Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (Hita laboratories, 1996). A statistically significant dose-dependent increase in the number of cells with structural aberrations and with polyploidy was observed in the presence of metabolic activation with 18 hours recovery in the initial and the repeat experiment. In cultures treated in the presence of metabolic activation with a 42 hours recovery period, no increase in structural aberrations was observed, though a statistically significant increase in polyploidy was reported but not at the highest dose tested. Only preliminary cytotoxicity data are available and not concurrent data. The pre-experiment for toxicity showed toxicity at 500 µg/ml (reduction of mitotic index to approximately 50%). The aberrations observed at 800 µg/ml are very possibly the result of excessive toxicity, and it is possible that the 500 µg/ml results are also a result of toxicity. Therefore, it is not possible to fully evaluate whether the increase in numerical aberration was a result of toxicity. No increase in numerical or structural aberrations was reported in the absence of metabolic activation. It is concluded that the test substance may be positive for cytogenicity under the conditions of the test.
The test substance has been tested in an in vivo micronucleus assay conducted according to OECD TG 474 and in compliance with GLP. No evidence of induction of micronuclei was observed in male ICR mice (Korea Institute of Toxicology, 2004). No signs of systemic toxicity were observed and the test item did not cause toxicity in the bone marrow. Solvent and positive controls gave expected responses. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of micronuclei under the conditions of the study. There are no toxicokinetic studies for the test substance to confirm exposure of the bone marrow. However, the available repeated dose toxicity study revealed non-adverse signs of systemic availability, such as hepatic hypertrophy, changes to clinical chemistry parameters and kidney weight changes.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, classification for genetic toxicity is not required for the submission substance according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.