Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation assay / Ames test): negative with and without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (OECD TG 471) (Genetic Laboratory, JBC Inc., 1994).


Cytogenicity in mammalian cells: positive with metabolic activation in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (similar to OECD 473) (Hita laboratories, 1996). Although induction of chromosomal aberration was not reported in the study without metabolic activation, structural aberrations at 500-800 µg/ml and numerical aberrations at 500 µg/ml in 18-h recovery the group were observed when tested in the presence of metabolic activation. Chromosomal aberrations were induced by the treatment with the positive control substances, mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide. No concurrent cytotoxicity data are presented in the report. The pre-experiment for toxicity showed a reduction of mitotic index to approximately 50% at 500 µg/ml. The aberrations observed at 800 µg/ml are very possibly the result of excessive toxicity, and it is possible that the 500 µg/ml results are also a result of toxicity. Therefore, it is not possible to fully evaluate the results.

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
22 July - 19 August 1994
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 472 (Genetic Toxicology: Escherichia coli, Reverse Mutation Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Standards for Mutagenicity Test using Microorganisms (JMOL)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Guidelines for Screening Toxicity Testing of Chemicals and Guidelines for Toxicity Testing of Chemicals (JMITI)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
tryptophan (E. coli strain) and histidine (Salmonella strains)
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone, S9 induced rat liver
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Preliminary test: 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000 µg/plate
Main test: 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: test substance was found to be soluble in DMSO and acetone, but not in water.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: AF-2; 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
Remarks:
-MA: TA 100, WP2 uvrA - 0.01 µg/plate; TA 98 - 0.1 µg/plate
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
-MA: TA 1535 - 0.5 µg/plate
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
-MA: TA 1537 - 80.0 µg/plate
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-AA (2-Aminoanthracene)
Remarks:
+MA: TA 1535 - 2.0 µg/plate; WP2 uvrA - 10.0 µg/plate
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
benzo(a)pyrene
Remarks:
+MA: TA 100, TA 98, TA 1537 - 5.0 µg/plate
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
ACTIVATION:
S9 mix per ml:
S9 fraction: 10 v/v%
MgCl2: 8 µmol
KCl: 33 µmol
G-6-P: 5 µmol
NADPH: 4 µmol
NADH: 4 µmol
0.5 ml S9 mix was added to a total volume of 2.7 ml, giving a final concentration of approximately 2% S9.


METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 37°C for 48 hours

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): minimum glucose agar

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicate plates, experiment repeated

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- increase in number of revertant colonies
Evaluation criteria:
The number of revertant colonies of each test group were compared with and analysed for a statistically significant increase (p<0.01) from that of the negative control group at each dose in each bacterial strain with and without metabolic activation.
Statistics:
Dunnett's multiple comparison (one-sided test)
Linear regression
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
Observations:
The test substance produced neither toxic effects nor a statistically significant increase in the number of revertant colonies in any conditions in any bacterial strains.

All of the positive controls produced significant increases in the number of revertant colonies in all bacterial strains with and without metabolic activation. This shows the test method employed in the test is effective for the purpose.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested

Table 1: Preliminary test - number of revertants per plate (mean of 2 plates)

Dose (µg/plate)

TA 100

TA 100

TA 1535

TA 1535

WP2 uvrA

WP2 uvrA

TA 98

TA 98

TA 1537

TA 1537

 

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

DMSO

133

124

9

11

28

31

26

29

10

10

10

133

115

9

13

24

30

26

27

8

12

50

126

120

11

11

24

29

26

34

8

9

100

123

116

8

14

30

35

20

30

7

12

500

135

133

9

14

23

32

21

36

9

9

1000

127

139

12

10

30

32

22

27

6

10

5000

126

138

14

10

29

36

27

36

5

5

Positive control

372

1227

301

413

99

733

497

277

730

53

 

Table 2: Main test 1 - number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

Dose (µg/plate)

TA 100

TA 100

TA 1535

TA 1535

WP2 uvrA

WP2 uvrA

TA 98

TA 98

TA 1537

TA 1537

 

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

DMSO

117

128

11

12

29

30

20

24

6

10

313

110

137

13

14

27

37

22

25

5

7

625

110

142

11

11

24

37

23

29

6

8

1250

111

128

9

12

29

31

21

32

8

8

2500

110

128

11

14

25

35

27

30

5

8

5000

116

116

10

12

27

37

23

25

5

6

Positive control

354

1178

285

444

85

818

457

273

990

55

 

Table 3: Main test 2 - number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

Dose (µg/plate)

TA 100

TA 100

TA 1535

TA 1535

WP2 uvrA

WP2 uvrA

TA 98

TA 98

TA 1537

TA 1537

 

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

- MA

+ MA

DMSO

115

122

11

12

25

33

2.5

28

7

11

313

112

121

10

11

29

34

2.3

31

8

10

625

124

135

9

12

30

36

1.5

30

8

8

1250

107

136

9

14

22

34

3.0

29

6

8

2500

119

117

9

10

27

33

6.0

23

8

9

5000

113

122

11

9

28

32

1.5

26

9

7

Positive control

438

1334

223

437

111

1087

456

273

1077

56

 

Conclusions:
The test substance has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria, in a study which was conducted according to the OECD TG 471 and 472 and in compliant with GLP. No evidence of a test-substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 or E. coli WP2 uvrA in the initial or the repeat experiments up to limit concentrations. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
The restrictions were that the number of cells evaluated does not comply with the current guideline. An audited translation from Japanese was available to the reviewer, date of translation November 12 1998.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
Version / remarks:
Annex V (In Vitro Cytogenetics)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The number of cells evaluated does not comply with the current guideline. Concurrent cytogenicity data are not included in the study report.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Species / strain / cell type:
mammalian cell line, other: Chinese Hamster Lung fibroblasts (CHL cells; clone 11)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone.
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment 1 and 2: 25, 50, 100 µg/ml (without metabolic activation); 200, 500, 800 µg/ml (with metabolic activation)
Vehicle / solvent:
Dimethyl sulphoxide
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
ACTIVATION: S9 mix included magnesium chloride, potassium chloride, Glucose-6-phosphate and NADP

METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6 hours (with metabolic activation); 24 and 48 hours (without metabolic activation)

Fixation time:
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 and 48 hours, with and without metabolic activation

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate cultures, experiment repeated

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: chromosome aberrations were evaluated in 200 metaphases per concentration; mitotic index was determined from 100 cells per concentration

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes
Evaluation criteria:
Structural aberrations (not including gaps) compared with negative control and judged to be: negative if incidence not increased with a significance level of 5%; positive if incidence not increased with a significance level of 5% and results reproducible.
Statistics:
Fischer's exact probability test.
Key result
Species / strain:
mammalian cell line, other: Chinese Hamster Lung fibroblasts (CHL cells; clone 11)
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
mitotic index reduced to approximately 50% of control at 500 µg/ml in the preliminary cytotoxicity study
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
mammalian cell line, other: Chinese Hamster Lung fibroblasts (CHL cells; clone 11)
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
mitotic index reduced to approximately 20% (18 h recovery) or 50% (48 hour recovery) of control at 100 µg/ml in the preliminary cytotoxicity study
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The preliminary cell growth and cell division inhibition test indicated that without metabolic activation 50% growth inhibition occurred at about 85 µg/ml (6 h exposure); at about 75 µg/ml (24 h exposure) and at about 65 µg/ml (48 h exposure); with metabolic activation 50% growth inhibition occurred at about 500 µg/ml.

Observations: The number of cells with numerical aberrations (polyploidy and endoreduplication) and chromatid type or chromosome type of structural aberration (gap ,break, exchange, etc.) was counted by observing 50 cells per slide and total 200 metaphases per each concentrations, and each incidence of the cells with the numerical and/or structural aberration was recorded. Total incidence of the cells with any aberration in each concentration was recorded in 2 ways of inclusion of gap or not. A gap was defined as a clear discontinuity, wider than one chromatid but narrower than two, accompanied with a minimal misalignment of the chromatid. Slides were all coded and blind-tested by microscopy. The mitotic rates for each group, except for the positive control, were calculated from the results of observation of 500 cells per dish, to make a total of 1000 cells per concentration.

Although induction of chromosomal aberration was not reported in the study without metabolic activation, structural aberrations at 500-800 µg/ml and numerical aberrations at 500 µg/ml in 18-h recovery the group were observed when tested in the presence of metabolic activation. Chromosomal aberrations were induced by the treatment with the positive control substances, mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide. No concurrent cytotoxicity data are presented in the report. The pre-experiment for toxicity showed a reduction of mitotic index to approximately 50% at 500 µg/ml. The aberrations observed at 800 µg/ml are very possibly the result of excessive toxicity, and it is possible that the 500 µg/ml results are also a result of toxicity. Therefore, it is not possible to fully evaluate the results.

Table 1: Results of the dose range finding test Direct method (without metabolic activation)

Concentration of test substance (µg/ml)

Cell growth rate

Cell growth rate

Mitotic rate

Mitotic rate

 

24 h-treatment

48 h-treatment

24 h-treatment

48 h-treatment

0

100

100

100

100

20

94.9

102.8

92.7

80.0

40

89.0

120.4

122.0

91.4

60

86.9

105.1

129.3

57.1

80

39.4

31.2

65.9

54.3

100

22.0

16.8

22.0

51.4

200

14.5

14.4

9.8

34.3

300

16.1

2.5

-

11.4

500

17.7

3.3

-

-

1000

11.5

3.2

-

-

 

Table 2: Results of the dose range finding test (with and without metabolic activation

Concentration of test substance (µg/ml)

Cell growth rate

Cell growth rate

Cell growth rate

Mitotic rate

Mitotic rate

Mitotic rate

 

-MA 18 h-recovery

+MA 18 h-recover

+MA 42 h-recovery

-MA 18 h-recovery

+MA 18 h-recover

+MA 42 h-recovery

0

100

100

100

100

100

100

40

94.0

-

-

92.6

-

-

60

93.6

-

-

81.5

-

-

80

60.0

-

-

74.1

-

-

100

22.1

90.7

96.8

44.1

90.7

80.9

200

6.4

89.5

93.5

-

89.5

104.3

300

3.0

82.9

78.0

-

82.9

89.4

500

3.4

54.2

51.1

-

54.2

87.2

800

1.3

10.5

20.9

-

10.5

48.9

1000*

2.1

0.9

0.6

-

-

-

1500*

-

0.9

0.3

-

-

-

2000*

-

0.6

0.3

-

-

-

3000*

-

0.9

0.4

-

-

-

*precipitation of the test substance was observed

 

Table 3: Results of chromosome aberration test (first trial, without metabolic activation)

Treatment time (h)

Concentration (µg/ml)

Number of polyploid cells

Percentage cells with aberrations

Percentage cells with aberrations

 

 

 

-g

+g

24

Solvent control

0

0

0

48

Solvent control

0

1

1

24

25

50

100

2

2

3

5*

2

1

5*

2

1

48

25

50

100

0

1

6*

2

0

2

2

1

2

24

Positive control

0

113

114

48

Positive control

1

129

130

 * significant at p < 0.05

 

Table 4: Results of chromosome aberration test (first trial, with and without metabolic activation)

S9 mix

Concentration (µg/ml)

Number of polyploid cells

Percentage cells with aberrations

Percentage cells with aberrations

 

 

 

-g

+g

-MA

Solvent control

0

1

1

+MA 18 h-recovery

Solvent control

0

1

1

-MA

25

50

100

0

0

0

2

1

2

2

2

2

+MA 18 h-recovery

200

500

800

1

16**

5*

0

41**

51**

0

42**

54**

-

Positive control

1

104

105

+MA 18 h-recovery

Positive control

2

70

72

 * significant at p < 0.05

* * significant at p < 0.01

 Table 5: Results of chromosome aberration test (first trial, with metabolic activation)

S9 mix

Concentration (µg/ml)

Number of polyploid cells

Percentage cells with aberrations

Percentage cells with aberrations

 

 

 

-g

+g

+MA 42 h-recovery

Solvent control

0

1

1

+MA 42 h-recovery

200

500

800

3

3

3

0

2

4

0

2

4

+ 42 h-recovery

Positive control

1

8

8

Table 6: Results of chromosome aberration test (second trial, without metabolic activation)

Treatment time (h)

Concentration (µg/ml)

Number of polyploid cells

Percentage cells with aberrations

Percentage cells with aberrations

 

 

 

-g

+g

24

Solvent control

0

2

3

48

Solvent control

3

2

2

24

25

50

100

2

0

0

2

1

3

2

1

3

48

25

50

100

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

24

Positive control

0

105

105

48

Positive control

0

85

87

 

Table 7: Results of chromosome aberration test (second trial, with and without metabolic activation)

S9 mix

Concentration (µg/ml)

Number of polyploid cells

Percentage cells with aberrations

Percentage cells with aberrations

 

 

 

-g

+g

-MA

Solvent control

1

1

1

+MA 18 h-recovery

Solvent control

0

0

0

-MA

25

50

100

1

1

1

3

1

0

4

1

0

+MA 18 h-recovery

200

500

800

1

26**

17**

10

54**

55**

11

57**

56**

-MA

Positive control

1

90

90

+MA 18 h-recovery

Positive control

0

88

89

 ** significant at p < 0.01

 

Table 8: Results of chromosome aberration test (second trial, with metabolic activation)

S9 mix

Concentration (µg/ml)

Number of polyploid cells

Percentage of cells with aberrations

Percentage of cells with aberrations

 

 

 

-g

+g

+MA 42 h-recovery

Solvent control

4

2

2

+MA 42 h-recovery

200

500

800

0

4

13*

4

6

3

4

6

3

+MA 42 h-recovery

Positive control

3

10

10

 * significant at p < 0.05

Conclusions:
The substance has been tested for cytogenicity in mammalian cells in a study conducted according to a Japanese guideline similar to OECD 473 and in compliance with GLP. A statistically significant dose-dependent increase in the number of cells with structural aberrations and with polyploidy was observed in the presence of metabolic activation with 18 hours recovery in the initial and the repeat experiment. In cultures treated in the presence of metabolic activation with a 42 hours recovery period, no increase in structural aberrations was observed, though a statistically significant increase in polyploidy was reported at the highest dose tested. Only preliminary cytotoxicity data are available, so it is not possible to evaluate whether the increase in numerical aberration was a result of toxicity. No increase in numerical or structural aberrations was reported in the absence of metabolic activation. It is concluded that the test substance may be positive for cytogenicity under the conditions of the test.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

Micronucleus assay in ICR mouse (oral administration): negative (OECD 474) (Korea Institute of Toxicology, 2004).

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
29 June 2004 to 16 July 2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
Version / remarks:
1997
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
micronucleus assay
Species:
mouse
Strain:
ICR
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Orient C., Ltd., Seoul, Korea
- Age at study initiation: six weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 23.5-27.0 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: using algorithm of Path/Tox so that each group had similar body weight distribution
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: up to six animals per cage in polycarbonate cages with bedding
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23°C ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 50%
- Air changes (per hr): 10-20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: mid-May 2004 To: July 8 2004
Route of administration:
oral: unspecified
Vehicle:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: olive oil
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: test item is insoluble in water
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: no information
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal): no information. It is not stated if administration was by gavage, but this is presumed to be the case
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Frequency of treatment:
Two treatments at 24 hour intervals
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw
Basis:

No. of animals per sex per dose:
Six males
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Positive control(s):
Positive control substance: cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): widely used in micronucleus assays
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 70 mg/kg bw
Tissues and cell types examined:
Bone marrow
Details of tissue and slide preparation:
CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: preliminary toxicity study

TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields): animals were sacrificed 24 hours after the second administration

DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: cells were collected in fetal bovine serum, centrifuged and smeared onto slides. Preparations were dried and fixed by submerging in methanol. Slides were stained with May-Grunwald and Giesma stains, then rinsed dried and mounted.

METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Slides were examined under x1000 magnification. Small round or oval bodies (1/5 to 1/20 diameter of PCE) were counted as micronuclei. Micronuclei were counted in 200 PCE's. The (PCE):(PCE+NCE) ratio was calculated by counting 500 cells
Evaluation criteria:
The result was judged as positive if there was a statistically significant and dose-related increase or a reproducible increase in the frequency of MNPCEs at least at one dose level.
Statistics:
Differences of numbers of MNPCRs between treated and vehicle control: Kruskal-Wallis' H-test and Dunnett's test.
Differences of numbers of MNPCRs between positive and vehicle control: Mann-Whitney's U-test.
Differences of PCE/(PCE+NCE) between treated and vehicle control:
Key result
Sex:
male
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
no effects
Remarks:
No effects observed in bone marrow, and no clinical signs were noted
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid

Table 1: Micronucleus test in male ICR mice

Chemical treated

Dose (mg/kg)

No. of animals

MNPCE/2000 PCEs

PCE/(PCE+NCE)

Vehicle

0

6

1.17

0.52

Test item

500

6

1.33

0.49

Test item

1000

6

1.83

0.55

Test item

2000

6

2.00

0.55

CPA

70

6

94.83**

0.45*

* Significantly different from the control at P <0.01

** Significantly different from the control at P < 0.05

Conclusions:
The test substance has been tested in an in vivo micronucleus assay conducted according to OECD 474 and in compliance with GLP. No evidence of induction of micronuclei was observed in male ICR mice. No signs of systemic toxicity were observed and the test item did not cause toxicity in the bone marrow. Solvent and positive controls gave expected responses. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of micronuclei under the conditions of the study.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

The submission substance has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria, in a study which was conducted according to the OECD TG 471 and OECD TG 472 and in compliance with GLP (Genetic Laboratory, JBC Inc., 1994). No evidence of a test-substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 or E. coli WP2 uvrA in the initial or the repeat experiments up to limit concentrations. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.

The submission substance has been tested for cytogenicity in mammalian cells in a study conducted according to a Japanese guideline similar to OECD TG 473 and in compliance with GLP using Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (Hita laboratories, 1996). A statistically significant dose-dependent increase in the number of cells with structural aberrations and with polyploidy was observed in the presence of metabolic activation with 18 hours recovery in the initial and the repeat experiment. In cultures treated in the presence of metabolic activation with a 42 hours recovery period, no increase in structural aberrations was observed, though a statistically significant increase in polyploidy was reported but not at the highest dose tested. Only preliminary cytotoxicity data are available and not concurrent data. The pre-experiment for toxicity showed toxicity at 500 µg/ml (reduction of mitotic index to approximately 50%). The aberrations observed at 800 µg/ml are very possibly the result of excessive toxicity, and it is possible that the 500 µg/ml results are also a result of toxicity. Therefore, it is not possible to fully evaluate whether the increase in numerical aberration was a result of toxicity. No increase in numerical or structural aberrations was reported in the absence of metabolic activation. It is concluded that the test substance may be positive for cytogenicity under the conditions of the test.

The test substance has been tested in an in vivo micronucleus assay conducted according to OECD TG 474 and in compliance with GLP. No evidence of induction of micronuclei was observed in male ICR mice (Korea Institute of Toxicology, 2004). No signs of systemic toxicity were observed and the test item did not cause toxicity in the bone marrow. Solvent and positive controls gave expected responses. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of micronuclei under the conditions of the study. There are no toxicokinetic studies for the test substance to confirm exposure of the bone marrow. However, the available repeated dose toxicity study revealed non-adverse signs of systemic availability, such as hepatic hypertrophy, changes to clinical chemistry parameters and kidney weight changes.


Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data, classification for genetic toxicity is not required for the submission substance according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.