Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 424-650-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 62.5, 125, and 250 ug/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 18 - 21 hours
- Exposure duration: 18 hours without S9, 3 hours in the presence of S9
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid (0.1 ug/mL final concentration)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 2% Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 well spread metaphases (100 metaphases per culture)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: visual - turbid cells or lack of growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes
- Other: structural chromosome and chromatid aberrations, interstitial deletions, and multiple aberrations
OTHER: The Verneir readings of all aberrant metaphases scored were recorded - Evaluation criteria:
- A test is considered to be positive if the aberration yield at at least one concentration is significantly above the concurrent control frequencies.
A test is considered to be negative if there is no significant increase in aberration frequency at any dose level, above the concurrent control frequencies.
A chemical is designated as a clastogen (chromosome breaking agent) if a positive result is obtained in both of two sets.
A chemical is designated as not-clastogenic if a negative result is obtained in both of two tests, one of which utilises two sampling times.
Gaps are recorded separately and not included in the final assessment of clastogenic activity.
Both statistitcal significance and biological relevance are considered together in the evaluation of the results. - Statistics:
- Fisher's exact probability test (two-sided)
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- From the aforementioned findings of the chromosome aberration assay it is concluded that 9,9 -bis(methoxymethyl)fluorene is clastogenic in the presence of S-9 mix under the conditions used in the study.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 21 July 1997
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- December 29 1992
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.5265 (The Salmonella typhimurium Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix (Rat liver treated with aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment: 0, 62, 185, 556, 1667, 5000 ug/plate
Second experiment: 0, 25, 74, 222, 667, 2000 ug/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: N-ethyl_N-nitrosourea, 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 days - Evaluation criteria:
- A study is considered valid if the mean colony counts of the negative control values of the strains are within the acceptable range and if the results of the positive controls meet the criteria for positive response. A reproducible two-fold or greater increase in the mean number of revertant colonies appearing in the test plates over and above the background spontaneous reversion rate observed with the negative control, or a demonstrable concentration-related effect, is taken to indiciate a positive response in this assay system.
- Statistics:
- None
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was not mutagenic in a bacterial reversion assay performed with Escherichia coli WP2 uvr A.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- May 26 1983
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 29 December 1992
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix (Rat liver treated with aroclor)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment: 0, 62, 185, 556, 1667, 5000 ug/plate
Second experiment: 0, 25, 74, 222, 667, 2000 ug/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Two independent mutagenicity assays were performed according to the protocol.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A study is considered valid if the mean colony counts of the control values of the strains are within the historical background range and if the results of the positive controls meet the criteria for a postive response. A positive response in the assay system is taken to be a two-fold or greater increase in the mean number of revertant colonies appearing in the test plates over and above the background spontanieous reversion rate observed with the vehicle, together with evidence of a dose-response. Both numerical significance and biological relevance are considered together in the evaluation.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In the first and second tests a slight toxic effect of the test substance was observed on the bacterial growth above 62 and 74 ug per plate respectively. A dose dependent precipitation was observed in both tests. As the precipitation in the first test at 5,000 ug per plate hampers counting of the number of revertant colonies appearing in the test plates over and above the background spontaneous reversion rate observed with the vehicle, together with evidence of a dose respone.
In both the absence and presence of the S9-mix in all strains the test substance did not cause a two fold greater increase in the mean number of revertant colonies appearing in the test plates over and above the background spontaneious revertant rate.
The positive controls gave the expected increase in the number of revertants in both the absence and presence of S9. - Conclusions:
- It is concluded that the results obtained with test substance 9,9 -bis(methoxymethyl)fluorene in S. tyhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, and TA 100 in both the absence and the presence of S9 -mix do not indicate mutagenicity under the conditions of the study. Therefore this substance is considered not mutagenic in S. typhimurium.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- April 4, 1984
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.5300 (Detection of Gene Mutations in Somatic Cells in Culture)
- Version / remarks:
- 7-1-91 edition
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes
- Target gene:
- HPRT on X-chromosome
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: University of Leiden, Netherlands
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture if applicable: cells stored as frozen stock cultires in liquid nitrogen
- Modal number of chromosomes: 22
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media including CO2 concentration if applicable: Ham's F12 culture medium (with Glutamax I), supplemented with heat-activated foetal calf serum (10% v/v) and gentamycin (50 mg/L). 5% CO2
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix (rat liver)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- -S9 mix (experiment 1 & 2): 0, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 ug/mL
+S9 mix (experiment 1): 0, 2.5, 5, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 ug/mL
+S9 mix (experiment 2): 0, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 ug/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
Most suitable vehicele for the test item used - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Growth medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- other: dimethylbenzanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 1.0 x 106 cells per flask
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 8 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 8 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 16 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine (6-TG)
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED:
fixed with 4% phosphate buffered formaldehyde solution for about 20 min, cell colonies were stained with 4% Giemsa solution
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: initial cell yield and by measuring the colony-forming ability of the CHO cells after approx. 24h after addition of test substance
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: cultures were discarded on the day post-treatment since the test substance dose levels resulted in <10% relative initial cell yield and/or precipitation of the test substance was visible at the end of the treatment - Rationale for test conditions:
- in accordance with guideline
- Evaluation criteria:
- a concentration-related increase in mutant frequency
a reproducible positive response for at least one of the test substance concentrations (e.g. the mean mutant frequency should be more than 20 mutant per 1,000,000 clonable cells (final survival)
both numerical and biological significence were considered together in the evaluation - Statistics:
- Not applied
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In both presence and absence of S9 mix, the test substance induced no concentration-related and/or reproducible increase in mutant frequency
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions employed in this examination the test substance, 9,9-bis-(methoxymethyl)fluorene is not mutagenic at the HPRT locus of Chinese hamster ovary cells
Referenceopen allclose all
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Swiss
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charels River Wiga GmbH
- Age at study initiation: young adult mice
- Assigned to test groups randomly: computer randomisation
- Housing: males housed individually, females were housed in groups of 5 per cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 72%
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 7 November 1995 To: 8,9,10 November 1995 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- maize oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Test substance was dissolved in maize oil one day prior to use.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1 gavage dose
- Post exposure period:
- Signs of reactions to treatment were recorded from ca. 1 - 4 hours after treatment and daily thereafter. At 24, 48, and 72h post-treatment, 10 controls (5m/5f) and 10 test animals (5m/5f) were killed by cervical dislocation. At 24h the 5 positive control animals were sacrificed. Bone marrow was immediately collected into foetal calf serum and processed into glassdrawn smears. Two bone marrow smears per animal were prepared, air-dried, fixed in methanol and stained with May-Brunwald Giemsa.
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Remarks:
- nominal concentration
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males/ 5 females
- Positive control(s):
- Mitomycin C (0.75 mg/kg bw)
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow smears onto glass slides
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- At sacrifice: Bone marrow was immediately collected into foetal calf serum and processed into glassdrawn smears. Two bone marrow smears per animal were prepared, air-dried, fixed in methanol and stained with May-Brunwald Giemsa.
- Evaluation criteria:
- The number of polychromatic erythrocytes per 1000 erythrocytes and the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes per 1000 polychromatic erythrocutes from the vehicle control and treatment group were analysed using three-way ANOVA with factors sex, group, and time.
- Statistics:
- Because the three way ANOVA yielded significant effects, the negative control group (A) was compared with the treatment group (B), using two sided asymptotic t-tests for each sex and time point. If the criteria for homogeneity of variances was not met (Leven's test), Brown-Forsythe ANOVA was used followed by separate variance t-tests.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In male mice treated with test compound, the number of PE per 1000 E was not statistically different than those found in vehicle controls, indicating that the treatment did not result in cytotoxicity to bone marrow cells. In female mice only at 48h was the number of PE per 1000 E statistically significantly lower than those found in the vehicle controls, indicating that the treatment resulted in cytotoxicity to bone marrow cells.
- Conclusions:
- No indication of chromosomal damage and/or damage to the mitotic apparatus in bone marrow cells of mice treated by gavage with 9,9-bis(methoxymethyl)fluorene at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg (limit dose)
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 486 (Unscheduled DNA Synthesis (UDS) Test with Mammalian Liver Cells in vivo)
- Version / remarks:
- Draft guideline at the time study was initiated
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 482 (Genetic toxicology: DNA damage and Repair/Unscheduled DNA synthesis in Mammalian cells in vitro)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To provide data on the potency of the test material to induce unscheduled DNA-synthesis (UDS) in primary rat hepatocytes after short -term exposure to rats.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- unscheduled DNA synthesis
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- Rat strain selected commonly used for this type of study
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Wiga Germany GmbH
- Age at study initiation: 8-10 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: Not specified
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: 2-16 hours before dosing
- Housing: makrolon cages with grid cover of stainless steel
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 3 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): ca. 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12hrs dark/12hrs light
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- PBS containing 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose
- Details on exposure:
- Animals were dosed by oral gavage
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- one dose
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once
- Post exposure period:
- 16 hours. Signs of reactions to treatment were recorded from 1-4 hours and 12-16 hours.
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12 males = 2000 mg/kg
12 males = vehicle control group - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 2-acetylaminofluorene. positive control animals were housed in a special "carcinogenicity unit" just prior to administration until sacrifice.
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- hepatocytes isolated from rat liver
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- liver of each rat was purfused in situ with Ca2+ and Mg2+-free HEPES buffer (0.01M) whilst under Nembutal anaesthesia, followed by an in vitro perfusion with a HEPES-buffered (0.1M) collagenase solution. After isolation, the dissociated cells were incubated for 10 minutes in a shaking waterbath at 37°C, filtrated over a 100 mesh nylon filter, centrifuged, resuspended in WEH medium [= Williams medium E supplemented with 20mM HEPES buffer and bovine serum albumin (10 mg/mL)] Thereafter, the cells were centrifugated, resuspended in WEC medium [= Williams medium E complete, which consists of Williams medium E supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, L-glutamine (2 mM) and gentamicin (50 ug/mL)], again centifugated and finally resuspended in WEC medium. Cell counts were made with a haeomocytometer. The viability of the hepatocytes was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Only hepatocytes suspensions with viability >6)% were used for in the repair assay.
Suspensions containing 5 x 10^5 cells/mL were prepared in WEC medium. Aliquots (one mL) were seeded onto Thermanox 25 mm ound plastic coverslips in 35mm 6-well dishes containing 2mL WEC. Cultures incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing ca. 5% CO2 and 95% air to allow cells to attach.
Hepatocyte cultures were incubated for c. 18 hours at 37°C. Cells fixed in three 30 changes of absolute ethanol-glacial acetic acid (3:1), air-dried and mounted on glass slides.
Slides were processed for audiradiography using Kodak NTB-2 emulsion. After 7 -14 days of exposure at ca. -20°C three slides per animal were developed with Kodak D19, fixed in Kodak Fixer and washed with water. Slides were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and embedded in DePeX. Slides were developed after 7 days of exposure appeared to be of good quality to allow subsequent scoring. Of each animal two slides were selected and coded by a qualified person not involved in the study to enable "blind" scoring. Reamining slides for each animal kept as a reserve. - Evaluation criteria:
- The response is considerd positive if the test substance yields =/>5 NG and =/>10% of the cells are in repair.
A test substance is considered negative if all dose levels and time points produce =/<0 NG.
Both numerical significance and biological relevance were considered together in the evlauation. - Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- test substance <-3.87 NG
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- induced = -3.87 NG
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- induced 20.94 NG (positive)
- Conclusions:
- It was concluded that the test substance did not induce DNA-repair activities in rat hepatocytes short-term in vivo exposure of rats under the conditions used in the present study.
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.11 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Bone-Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- chromosome aberration assay
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Wiga Germany
- Age at study initiation: 10 - 12 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 270 - 333 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, computer randomisation
- Fasting period before study: 16 hours
- Housing: 5 rats per cage/ separated by sex - sterilized stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period:5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70%
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 12 June 1996 To:12,13,14 June 1996 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- On day 0, before dosing animals were weighed. The test substance was suspended in corn oil a few hours before use and administred to rats once via gavage after the 16 hour fast.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 animals/sex
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Mitomycin C at 2.5 mg/kg-bw
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow sampling
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- At ca. 6, 24, and 48 hours after administration of the test substance 5 animals/sex of each of the three test groups and the negative control group were sacrificed. Two hours prior to sacrifice, animals were injected i.p. with colchicine at a concentration of 4 mg/kg. After sacrifice femurs were dissected free. Bone marrow cells were removed by flushing with Hanks Balanced Salt Solution and fixed with methanol/glacial acetic acid. Slides were stained with 2% Giemsa solution. Two slides per animal were prepared. One thousand cells, 500 cells per slide, were examined to determine the percentage of cells in mitosis. On each slide 25 well-spread metaphases, were analyzed for chromoatid-type (gaps, breaks, minutes, rings, dicentrics) of aberrations, and other anomalies (endoreduplication, polyploid cells, heavily damaged cells).
- Evaluation criteria:
- The criteria for a positive response was a clear increase in the percentage of cells with strucutural aberrations over the concurrent control frequencies (in the whole group).
A test substance was considered to be negative in the in vivo chromosome aberration test if it produced no increase in the number of structural chromosomal aberrations at any of the test points.
Both statistical significance and biological relevance were conisidered together in the evaluation.
Gaps (achromatic lesions) were recorded separately and not included in the final assessment of clastogenic activity. - Statistics:
- Data were analysed statistically by the Fisher's exact probability test (two-sided) to determine signifcant differences between treated and control groups.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The test substance did not induce a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations at the concentration of 2000 mg/kg bw at any of the time points analysed, when compared with the vehicle control values.
At the post-treatment time of 6 hours, the mean mitotic index of the female rats treated with the test substance was reduced to 1.62% when compared to the mean mitotic index of the female control rats (2.94%)
At the post treatment time of 48 hours, the mean mitotic index of the female rats treated with the test substance was reduced to 2.04% when compared to the mean mitotic index of the female control rats (2.80%)
The positive control substance, Mitomycin C, showed the expected statistically significant increase in the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations. - Conclusions:
- From the reported findings it is concluded that 9,9 -bis-(methoxymethyl)fluorene is considered not clastogenic because it did not induce a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations in bone marrow cells of male and female rats under the conditions employed in the study.
Referenceopen allclose all
Results of DNA repair test (summarised results for each dose level)
Group |
Treatment |
Dose |
NUC |
SD +/- |
CYT |
SD +/- |
NG |
SD +/- |
%IR |
SD +/- |
A (negative) |
1-4 hr |
0 |
27.67 |
1.59 |
35.98 |
4.25 |
-8.31 |
2.67 |
5.33 |
2.52 |
B (test item) |
1-4 hr |
2000 mg/kg |
21.10 |
2.62 |
25.95 |
1.94 |
-4.85 |
0.76 |
6.67 |
3.79 |
A (negative) |
12-16 hr |
0 |
24.16 |
4.39 |
28.03 |
4.15 |
-3.87 |
2.16 |
15.33 |
6.66 |
B (test item) |
12-16 hr |
2000 mg/kg |
26.62 |
3.09 |
31.67 |
5.77 |
-5.05 |
3.07 |
10.67 |
4.04 |
D (positive control) |
12 -16 hr |
50 mg/kg |
60.57 |
10.48 |
39.64 |
6.10 |
20.94 |
12.14 |
81.33 |
15.82 |
NUC = Mean nuclear grain count
CYT = Mean cytoplasm grain count (nuclear sized area)
NG = Mean net grains per nuclues
SD = Standard Deviation
%IR = Percent of cells in repair (more or equal to 5 NG)
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Data available to assess the genetic toxicity includes bacterial reverse mutation assays, in vitro clastogenic assay, in vivo micronucleus, and in vivo clastogenic assay. Positive findings in the in vitro clastogenicity experiment with CHO cells was not observed in vivo with Wistar rats. There were no positive findings in the in vivo micronucleus assay or the bacterial reverse mutation assays. The weight of evidence indicates that this substance (Donor C20) is not a germ cell mutagen.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data set, it is concluded that the substance does not met the criteria to be classified as germ cell mutagen (negative results observed in all in vivo studies) and therefore classification under the CLP regulation (1272/2008 EC, as amended) is not warranted.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.