Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.85 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
50
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
75 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
92.6 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

There are no adequate experimental data on the inhalation route available. Therefore, the worker-DNEL long-term for inhalation route - systemic is derived from the NOAEL of 75 mg/kg bw/day, obtained in the Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test study in Wistar rats. The NOAECcorr. is calculated as follows:

- standard respiratory volume (rat) = 0.38 m³/kg (8h exposure)

- standard respiratory volume (human) = 6.7 m³/person (8h exposure)

- worker respiratory volume = 10 m³/person (8h exposure)

- absorption (oral, rat) = 50 % (default)

- absorption (inhalative, human) = 100 % (default)

--> modified dose descriptor (corrected inhalatory NOAEC) = oral NOAEL/0.38 x (50/100) x (6.7/10) x (7 exposure days/week; rat/5 exposure days/week; worker) = 92.6 mg/m³

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance (starting point for the DNEL calculation is a NOAEL)
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
4
Justification:
According to the ECHA REACH Guidance an assessment factor of 6 should be used as default value for a subacute study and a factor of 2 for a sub-chronic study. The NOAEL used for hazard assessment was determined from a repeated dose study (combined with reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test) where the animals were treated continuously for a period of 66 days, which is twice as long is in a subacute study. Thus, an assessment factor of 4 is used to extrapolate from this study duration to a chronic study.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
No allometric scaling has to be applied in case of oral to inhalation route to route extrapolation.
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance (good/standard quality of the database)
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.85 mg/m³
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - workers

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected

Additional information - General Population

No consumer uses were identified. The general population does not get in contact with the substance. Therefore, in accordance with the REACH legislation (regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex I, 1.4.1), no DNEL has to be derived for the general population.