Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2009-05-05 - 2009-06-25
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ICCVAm Test Method Evaluation Report: Appendix G, ICCVAM recommended HET-CAM Method protocol (Nov. 2006)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dodecaaluminium calcium nonadecaoxide
EC Number:
234-468-4
EC Name:
Dodecaaluminium calcium nonadecaoxide
Cas Number:
12005-50-4
Molecular formula:
Al12O19.Ca
IUPAC Name:
dodecaaluminium(3+) calcium nonadecaoxidandiide

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: chicken's eggs
Strain:
other: Leghorn's chicken's eggs
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Species: Lohmann selected Leghorn chicken's eggs

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: Negative control: physiol. sodium chloride solution
Duration of treatment / exposure:
300 seconds
Observation period (in vivo):
300 seconds
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6 chicken eggs

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
mean
Value:
0
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Conclusions:
This in vitro study was performed to assess the irritating potential of Dodecaaluminium calcium nonadecaoxide, Al12O19Ca (Calciumhexalumi¬nate, CA6) by detection of damages in blood vessels under the chorionallantoic membrane of incubated chicken eggs (nine days old). Observation time was 5 minutes at room temperature.
Physiological sodium chloride solution was used as negative control, sodium dodecyl sulfate (1% solution ) and sodium hydroxide (0.1-N solution) were used as positive controls.
The positive controls induced severe irritation on the blood vessels, the irritation score for the positive controls lay within the demanded range. The negative control showed no irritation.
The test item was tested pure. A mean irritation score of 0.0 was calculated, corresponding to a classification as “not irritant”.
No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome. The test is considered valid.
Executive summary:

This in vitro study was performed to assess the irritating potential ofDodecaaluminium calcium nonadecaoxide, Al12O19Ca (Calciumhexalumi­nate, CA6) by detection of damages in blood vessels under the chorionallantoic membrane of incubated chicken eggs (nine days old). Observation time was 5 minutes at room temperature.

Physiological sodium chloride solution was used as negative control, sodium dodecyl sulfate (1% solution ) and sodium hydroxide (0.1-N solution) were used as positive controls.

The positive controls induced severe irritation on the blood vessels, the irritation score for the positive controls lay within the demanded range. The negative control showed no irritation.

The test item was tested pure. A mean irritation score of 0.0 was calculated, corresponding to a classification as “not irritant”.

No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome. The test is considered valid.