Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Potassium nitrate
EC Number:
231-818-8
EC Name:
Potassium nitrate
Cas Number:
7757-79-1
Molecular formula:
HNO3.K
IUPAC Name:
potassium nitrate
Test material form:
solid: crystalline
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Potassium nitrate
- Substance type: White crystalline solid
- Stability under test conditions: Stable
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature in the dark

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories U.K. Ltd., Loughborough, UK.
- Age at study initiation: Animals used within the study were 12-20 weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation: The animals weighed 2.08 or 2.14 kg.
- Housing: Individually housed in suspended cages.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum (2030 Teklad Global Rabbit diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories U.K. Ltd, Oxon, UK)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to water.
- Acclimatization period: at least 5 days before start of treatment under laboratory conditions.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 – 23ºC
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70%
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light and 12 hours darkness per day


IN-LIFE DATES:

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: One eye of each animal remained untreated and served as the reference control.
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied weight with unit: 0.1 mL (approximately 92 mg)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single instillation on Day 1
Observation period (in vivo):
The eyes of each animal were examined approximately 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after instillation of the test substance.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2 Males
Details on study design:
STUDY DESIGN
Animals free of ocular damage were used. Initially, a single rabbit was treated. A volume of 0.1 mL (approximately 92 mg) was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were hold together for about one second immediately aftert treatment, to prevent loss of the test item, and then released. The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. Immediately after administration of the test item, an assessment of the initial pain reaction was made.

After consideration of the ocular responses produced in the first treated animal, a second animal was treated. In order to minimise pain on application of the test item, one drop of local anaesthetic (Tetracaine hydrochloride 0.5%, Chauvin Pharmaceuticals, Romford, Essex, UK) was instilled into both eyes of the second animal 1 to 2 minutes before treatment.

Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment, according to the numerical evaluation given below.

Any other ocular effects were also noted. Examination of the eyes was facilitated by the use of the light source from a standard opthalmoscope.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No

OBSERVATION
The irritation was assessed according to a numerical scoring system (Draize Scale for Scoring Ocular Irritation)

SCORING SYSTEM:

CORNEAL IRRITATION
Degree of opacity (most dense are used)
0: No opacity
1: Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity, details of iris clearly visible
2: Easily discernible translucent area, details of iris slightly obscured
3: Opalescent areas, no details of iris visible, size of pupil barely discernible
4: Opaque, iris not discernible through the opacity

Area of cornea involved:
1: One quarter (or less) but not zero
2: Greater than one quarter, but less than half
3: Greater than half, but less than three quarters
4: Greater than three quarters, up to whole area

IRIS
0: Normal
1: Folds above normal, congestion, swelling, circumcorneal injection (any or all of these or combination thereof) iris still reacting to light (sluggish reaction is positive)
2: No reaction to light, hemorrhage, gross destruction (any or all of these)

CONJUNCTIVAL IRRITATION
Redness (refers to palpebrae and bulbar conjuntivae, excluding cornea and iris):
0: Vessels normal
1: Vessels definitely injected above normal
2: More diffuse, deeper crimson red, individual vessels not easily discernible
3: Diffuse beefy red

Chemosis:
0: No swelling
1: Any swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes)
2: Obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids
3: Swelling with lids about half closed
4: Swelling with lids more than half closed

Discharge:
0: No discharge
1: Any amount different from normal (does not include small amounts observed in inner canthus of normal animals)
2: Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs just adjacent to lids
3: Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs a considerable area around the eye


Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
mean
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
mean
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Remarks:
mean
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Remarks:
mean
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
mean (redness)
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.7
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hrs
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
mean (redness)
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.7
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Remarks:
mean
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hrs
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Remarks:
mean
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
mean (discharge)
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hrs
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
mean (discharge)
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.7
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Irritation
Instillation of approximately 96 mg of Natriumnitrat HQ unbehandelt (non-food grade) (a volume of approximately 0.1 mL) into one eye of each of three rabbits resulted in effects on the cornea, iris and conjunctivae.
The corneal injury consisted of slightly dulling of the luster only. This was seen in two animals and was resolved within 24 hours after instillation in both animals.
Iridial irritation grade 1 was observed in two animals and resolved within 24 hours in both animals.
The irritation of the conjunctivae consisted of redness, chemosis and discharge and completely resolved within 7 days in all three animals. For redness the mean over 24, 48 and 72 hours was grade 2.0 in all three animals.

Treatment of the eyes with 2% fluorescein 24 hours after test substance instillation revealed no corneal epithelial damage.

Corrosion
There was no evidence of ocular corrosion.

See also attached tables

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
Not classified according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008
Conclusions:
The material did not meet the criteria for classification as an eye irritant substance according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008
Executive summary:

The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test item to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbit. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:

-OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 405 “Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion” (adopted 24 April 2002)

- Method B5 Acute Toxicity (Eye Irritation) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008

A single application of the test item to the non-irrigated eye of two rabbits produced moderate conjunctival irritation. One treated eye appeared normal at the 72-Hour observation and the other treated eye appeared normal at the 7-Day observation.

Based on the results, the test material did not meet the criteria for classification as an irritant according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.