Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Additional physico-chemical information

Administrative data

Endpoint:
other: representative mineralogy
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: non GLP but other quality assurance
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Chemistry /elemental analysis was determined using ICP (inductively Coupled Plasma spectroscopy). Metal speciation/metal mineralogy was assessed from Sequential extraction/metal analysis and mineralogical analysis (XRD and microscopes equipped with EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectrometry) and WDS (Wavelength Dispersive Spectrometry) analysers. The interpretation of the overall results was performed by expert (with profound knowledge of metal particularities).
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
other quality assurance

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Speiss, lead
EC Number:
282-366-3
EC Name:
Speiss, lead
Cas Number:
84195-61-9
Molecular formula:
Molecular weight/formula concept not applicable to Inorganic UVCB (complex metal containing substance)
IUPAC Name:
Speiss, lead

Results and discussion

Results:
The studied speiss sample 09TT08036 (Speiss lead Grade 1) contains 53% copper, 15% lead, 17% antimony, 6.2% arsenic, 2.5% tin, 1% sulphur and traces of other elements.

The studied speiss sample 09TT08042 (Speiss lead Grade 2) contains 36% copper, 22% lead, 11% sulphur, 6.2% arsenic, 4.8% iron, 4.7% nickel, 4.3% tin, 3.5 % antimony and traces of other elements.

The studied speiss sample 09TT08036 consists mainly of antimony copper, Cu11Sb3 (44.9%), koutekite, Cu5As2 (22.6%) and metallic lead (14.6%). Other notable mineral phases are metallic copper (4.8%), sorosite, Cu3Sn (4.2%) and chalcocite, Cu2S (3.4%). Chvilevalite, rosiaite, modderite, massicot and hematite occur as accessory minerals. Main copper and antimony carrier is antimony copper (53%) and koutekite carries almost half of the arsenic
content. Lead is mainly (94%) metallic.
The studied speiss sample 09TT08042, consists mainly of iron-rich (avg.7%Fe) chalcocite, Cu2S (39.6%), galena, PbS (15.4%), sorosite, Cu(SnSb) (13%), metallic lead (10.2%), NiAsSnSb –alloys (9.9%). Other notable mineral phases are stibnite, Sb2S3 (4.5%) and nickel and copper arsenides (3.7%). Silicates, magnetite, lead oxides, metallic silver and copper are as accessory minerals. Lead is distributed almost in half between galena and
metallic lead. Copper is mainly carried by chalcocite (77%). Stibnite is the main (52%) antimony carrier. Arsenic and tin is mainly carried by NiAsSnSb –alloys.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table1: Chemical composition of studied samples

Lab code

 

 

09TT08036

 

 

 

 

 

Sample

 

 

SpeissLead

 

 

 

 

 

Sample code

 

 

OR01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As

P1

%

<0.003

 

Ag

KEM

%

0,13

 

P2

%

0,047

 

B

KEM

%

Na

 

P3

%

0,1

 

Bi

TOT

%

<0,05

 

P4

%

2,06

 

Cd

TOT

%

0,021

 

Sum

 

2,207

 

Co

TOT

%

0,11

 

TOT

%

6,24

 

Mo

TOT

%

<0,002

Cu

P1

%

<0,003

 

Sb

TOT

%

17,3

 

P2

%

0,87

 

Se

TOT

%

0,095

 

P3

%

17,1

 

Sn

TOT

%

2,48

 

P4

%

33,3

 

Te

TOT

%

0,03

 

Sum

 

51,27

 

Zn

TOT

%

0,19

 

TOT

%

53,3

 

 

 

 

 

Fe

P1

%

<0,003

 

SiO2

KEM

%

0,52

 

P2

%

0,12

 

Al2O3

TOT

%

0,010

 

P3

%

0,04

 

CaO

TOT

%

0,010

 

P4

%

0,15

 

Cr2O3

TOT

%

<0,003

 

Sum

 

0,31

 

K2O

TOT

%

<0,05

 

TOT

%

0,45

 

MgO

TOT

%

0,004

Ni

P1

%

<0,003

 

MnO

TOT

%

<0,003

 

P2

%

0,009

 

Na2O

TOT

%

0,18

 

P3

%

0,007

 

SO42-

KEM

%

0,027

 

P4

%

0,71

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sum

 

0,726

 

S

Leco

%

1,03

 

TOT

%

0,75

 

C

Leco

%

0,14

Pb

P1

%

0,003

 

Satmagan

 

%

0,0

 

P2

%

0,20

 

 

 

 

 

 

P3

%

<0,04

 

 

 

 

 

 

P4

%

12,5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sum

 

12,703

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOT

%

15,2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lab code

 

 

09TT08042

 

 

 

 

 

Sample

 

 

LeadSpeiss

 

 

 

 

 

Sample code

 

 

OR20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As

P1

%

<0,003

 

Ag

KEM

%

0,14

 

P2

%

0,10

 

B

KEM

%

Na

 

P3

%

0,13

 

Bi

TOT

%

<0,05

 

P4

%

2,43

 

Cd

TOT

%

0,01

 

Sum

 

2,66

 

Co

TOT

%

0,56

 

TOT

%

6,21

 

Mo

TOT

%

<0,002

Cu

P1

%

<0,003

 

Sb

TOT

%

3,54

 

P2

%

0,40

 

Se

TOT

%

0,75

 

P3

%

27,9

 

Sn

TOT

%

4,31

 

P4

%

5,94

 

Te

TOT

%

0,023

 

Sum

 

34,24

 

Zn

TOT

%

0,71

 

TOT

%

36,2

 

 

 

 

 

Fe

P1

%

<0,003

 

SiO2

KEM

%

0,78

 

P2

%

0,81

 

Al2O3

TOT

%

0,029

 

P3

%

1,63

 

CaO

TOT

%

0,12

 

P4

%

1,47

 

Cr2O3

TOT

%

0,004

 

Sum

 

3,91

 

K2O

TOT

%

<0,05

 

TOT

%

4,76

 

MgO

TOT

%

0,015

Ni

P1

%

<0,003

 

MnO

TOT

%

0,007

 

P2

%

0,12

 

Na2O

TOT

%

0,035

 

P3

%

0,049

 

SO42-

KEM

%

0,037

 

P4

%

3,50

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sum

 

3,669

 

S

Leco

%

11,0

 

TOT

%

4,67

 

C

Leco

%

0,07

Pb

P1

%

0,34

 

Satmagan

 

%

1,09

 

P2

%

0,19

 

 

 

 

 

 

P3

%

<0,04

 

 

 

 

 

 

P4

%

22,7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sum

 

23,23

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOT

%

22,3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 P1= H2O, P2= H2SO4 , P3= KCN+Br-MeOH, P4= HNO3 –soluble, TOT= total -, BM= bromine-methanol dissolutions, KEM= ion exchange chromatography, LECO = S/C analyzer, satmagan = Fe3O4 analyzer

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Good quality study that assessed full chemistry and mineralogy of two representative samples of speiss lead. The mineralogy (and the distribution pattern for each key element, i.e. % from Total into the various mineralogical forms/species present into the UVCB) of the reference samples can be used to derive the classification of speiss lead samples (mixture toxicity rules).
Executive summary:

The studied speiss sample 09TT08036 consists mainly of antimony copper, Cu11Sb3 (44.9%), koutekite, Cu5As2 (22.6%) and metallic lead (14.6%). Other notable mineral phases are metallic copper (4.8%), sorosite, Cu3Sn (4.2%) and chalcocite, Cu2S (3.4%). Chvilevalite, rosiaite, modderite, massicot and hematite occur as accessory minerals. Main copper and antimony carrier is antimony copper (53%) and koutekite carries almost half of the arsenic content. Lead is mainly (94%) metallic. The studied speiss sample 09TT08042 consists mainly of iron-rich (avg.7%Fe) chalcocite, Cu2S (39.6%), galena, PbS (15.4%), sorosite, Cu(SnSb) (13%), metallic lead (10.2%), NiAsSnSb –alloys (9.9%). Other notable mineral phases are stibnite, Sb2S3 (4.5%) and nickel and copper arsenides (3.7%). Silicates, magnetite, lead oxides, metallic silver and copper are as accessory minerals. Lead is distributed almost in half between galena and metallic lead. Copper is mainly carried by chalcocite (77%). Stibnite is the main (52%) antimony carrier. Arsenic and tin is mainly carried by NiAsSnSb –alloys.

The mineralogy of the reference samples can be used to derive the classification of both samples but also to predict the mineralogy of other speiss lead samples. Differences in speciation between the reference samples, and anticipated differences in classification, initially suggested the need for two grades of this intermediate based on the sulphur content. As a consequence, company specific classifications were calculated using one of the two different speciation patterns. However, since it turned out that both speciation patterns resulted in very similar classifications for all company specific samples, it was decided to revert to a single grade for this intermediate.

The calculator sheets, which are used to derive the classification and which reflect particular assumptions that are made, can be found in attachment above (attached background material).