Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1987/1988
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Species:
guinea pig
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: ICI Colours and FIne Chemical
- Weight at study initiation: 250-396 g


Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
treatment group
26% (w/v) Reactive Blue 198 of the test sample in deionised water
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
treatment group
26% (w/v) Reactive Blue 198 of the test sample in deionised water
No. of animals per dose:
20
Challenge controls:
1% (w/v) preparation of the Reactive Blue 198 in deionised water to the left shorn flank
Positive control substance(s):
no
Positive control results:
Challenge with a 46% (w/v) preparation of the test sample in deionised water elicited a strong sensitisation response in previously-induced guinea pigs. Challenge with a 26% (w/v) preparation of the test sample in deionised water elicited a moderate sensitisation response in previously-induced guinea pigs. No sensitisation response was elicited following challenge with a 1% (w/v) preparation of the test sample in deionised water.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
26% (w/v) preparation of the test sample in deionised water
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 26% (w/v) preparation of the test sample in deionised water. No with. + reactions: 5.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
26% (w/v) preparation of the test sample in deionised water
No. with + reactions:
10
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 26% (w/v) preparation of the test sample in deionised water. No with. + reactions: 10.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The present study has shown that after the release treatment 50% of the animals has given positive response.
According to the evaluation criteria of Directive 83/467/EEC, Reactive Blue 198 in the maximization test is a moderate sensitizer.
Executive summary:

The net response was calculated to be 67% and, therefore, when previously induced guinea pigs were challenged with a 46% (w/v) preparation of Reactive Blue 198, a strong sensitisation response was elicited. Following challenge with a 26% (w/v) preparation of the test sample in deionised water, moderate diffuse redness was observed in three test animals and scattered mild redness in seven test animals. None of the control animals showed a response.

The net response was calculated to be 50% and, therefore, when previously induced guinea pigs were challenged with a 26% (w/v) preparation of Reactive Blue 198, a moderate sensitisation response was elicited.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

The net response was calculated to be 67% and, therefore, when previously induced guinea pigs were challenged with a 46% (w/v) preparation of Reactive Blue 198, a strong sensitisation response was elicited. Following challenge with a 26% (w/v) preparation of the test sample in deionised water, moderate diffuse redness was observed in three test animals and scattered mild redness in seven test animals. None of the control animals showed a response.

The net response was calculated to be 50% and, therefore, when previously induced guinea pigs were challenged with a 26% (w/v) preparation of Reactive Blue 198, a moderate sensitisation response was elicited.


Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
According to the evaluation criteria of Directive 83/467/EEC, Reactive Blue 198 in the maximization test is a moderate sensitizer.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification