Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The test substance is not sensitizing in animal studies.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
no positive control group (not required by 1981 version of guideline)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
An appropriate guinea pig maximisation test is available which would not justify conducting an additional LLNA due to animal welfare.
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Albino, Bor: DHPW
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: F. Winkelmann, Borchen (DE)
- Weight at study initiation: 314.2 g (mean)
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
10% (in Freund's Complete Adjuvant (FCA))

2nd challenge: undiluted
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
undiluted
No.:
#2
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
undiluted
No. of animals per dose:
20 (test)
10 (control)
Details on study design:
1st application: Induction 10 % intracutaneous
2nd application: Challenge undiluted occlusive epicutaneous
3rd application: Challenge undiluted occlusive epicutaneous
Positive control substance(s):
no
Reading:
other: 1st and 2nd reading
Dose level:
undiluted
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

In a guinea pig maximization test (according to OECD Guideline 406, positive control not required by 1981 guideline version), sensitization was not observed in any of 20 animals (Huels AG, 1988).

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for skin sensitization under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the 14th time in Regulation (EU) 2020/217.