Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to microorganisms

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation))
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.11 (Biodegradation: Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
no
Vehicle:
no
Test organisms (species):
activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
Details on inoculum:
- Name and location of sewage treatment plant where inoculum was collected: Ruhrverband Kläranlage, Sunthelle 6, 57392 Schmallenberg, Germany
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: the sludge was sieved, left alone to settle and the supernatant was decanted. The sludge was washed one time with isotonic solution. A small amount of the sludge was weighed and dried. From this result a stock solution of activated sludge in tap water was prepared with a mixed liquor suspended solids level of about 1 – 4 g dry mass sludge/liter.
The sludge stock solution was fed with synthetic sewage feed and was incubated aerated overnight at 20 ± 2 °C in the dark. The amount of food applied was 25 mL/L. After this preincubation, the activated sludge was adjusted on a mixed liquor suspended solids level of about 2 – 4 g dry mass sludge/liter. From this sludge, an amount to achieve a mixed liquor suspended solids level in the test vessel of nominally 1.5 g/L was applied.
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
3 h
Test temperature:
19.5 - 21.5 °C
pH:
8.4 - 8.5
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal concentrations: 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 mg Pt TEAH solution per liter
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 500 mL
- Aeration: air flow 0.5 – 1 L/min
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 5
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6 vessels containing only inoculum (3 replicates were measured at the beginning and 3 at the end of the test assay series.
- No. of vessels per positive control (replicates): 1
- Sludge concentration (weight of dry solids per volume): 3.8 g/L
- Nutrients provided for bacteria: synthetic sewagecontainin peptone 16.0 g, meats extract 11.0 g, urea 3.0 g, NaCl 0.7 g, CaCl2.2H2O 0.4 g, MgSO4.7H2O 0.2 g, K2HPO4 2.8 g and deionised water ad 1000 mL.

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: deionized water, free from inhibitory concentrations of toxic substances (e.g. Cu2+ ions)

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : the total microbial respiration rate (total oxygen uptake including heterotrophic and nitrification uptake) was investigated by measurement of the oxygen concentration over a period of 10 minutes or at least until an O2-content of 2.5 mg O2/L was reached 3 hours after start of incubation

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 2
- Range finding study: A range finding test was conducted to check if any adverse effect occurs up to and including a nominal loading of 1000 mg/L (test concentrations 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L). The effect of the test item on the total microbial respiration rate was investigated. Inhibition was found to be greater than 20% at 1000 mg/L. Therefore, a dose-response test with five concentrations was applied as main test.
- Test concentrations: 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/L test item (definite test)
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study:significant inhibition was observed in the range finding study
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
3,5-dichlorophenol
Duration:
3 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
145 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
inhibition of total respiration
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
95% Confidence Interval: 43 - 239 mg/L
Duration:
3 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 1 000 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
inhibition of total respiration
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
95% Confidence Interval: >1000 - >1000 mg/L
Duration:
3 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
250 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
inhibition of total respiration
Duration:
3 h
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
500 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
inhibition of total respiration
Results with reference substance (positive control):
The EC50 for the reference item was found to be 15.7 mg/L and is therefore within the accepted range of the OECD 209 guideline of 2 to 25 mg/L.
Reported statistics and error estimates:
A LOEC was calculated by using ANOVA followed by Step-down Jonckheere-Terpstra Test Procedure. For trend analysis, a Contrasts test (Monotonicity of Concentration/Response) for metric data was applied. Since the test results show a concentration-response relationship, they were statistically analysed to determine EC values together with 95% confidence intervals using Probit-analysis assuming log-normal distribution of the values a non-linear data analysis.
The evaluation of the concentration-effect-relationships and the calculations of effect concentrations were based on the nominal test item concentrations.
For statistical calculations, the computer program ToxRat Professional version 3.3.0 by ToxRat® Solutions GmbH was applied.

Mean respiration rate (mg O2/(h*g dry mass)).

                  TI = Test item; SD = Standard deviation; CV = Coefficient of variance.

 

Control

62.5 mg TI / L

125 mg TI / L

250 mg TI / L

500 mg TI / L

1000 mg TI / L

Mean

36.5

39.7

38.7

31.7

24.7

26.4

SD

8.7

8.6

10.0

6.0

3.2

2.1

CV

23.7

21.5

25.7

19.1

13.1

8.1

 

Mean inhibition (%) of the respiration rate by the test item.

                  TI = Test item; *: significant difference when compared with control (p < 0.05).

62.5 mg TI / L

125 mg TI / L

250 mg TI / L

500 mg TI / L

1000 mg TI / L

           -8.9%

-6.0%

13.2%

32.3% *

27.7% *

 

Effect concentration values [mg/L] for respiration rate.

                  EC = Effect concentration where x % inhibition deviation occurred against control; CL = Confidence level.

Parameter

EC10

EC20

EC50

EC80

NOEC

LOEC

 

[mg test item/L]

Value

145

396

>1000

>1000

250

500

95 %-CL

(43 – 239)

(241 – 573)

(>1000 – >1000)

(>1000 – >1000)

-

-

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
A significant inhibition of bacterial respiration by Pt TEAH solution started at a concentration of 500 mg per liter nominal loading. The NOEC is 250 mg Pt TEAH solution per liter. The EC10 and EC50 of Pt TEAH solution is 145 mg/L (95% CL: 43 – 239 mg/L) and >1000 mg/L (95% CL: >1000 – >1000), respectively, based on nominal loading.
Executive summary:

An activated sludge respiration inhibition test was conducted with di(tetraethylammonium)hexahydroxoplatinate(IV). The study is reliable without restrictions, being GLP-compliant and having followed standard test guidelines (OECD 209 and EU Method C.11).

The test item was given to the synthetic sewage with a concentration of 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 mg Pt TEAH solution per liter. A positive control was used, and all validity criteria were met. Di(tetraethylammonium)hexahydroxoplatinate(IV) had a statistically significant effect on bacterial respiration. Starting at a loading of 500 mg/L, the test item inhibited the respiration of the inoculum significantly. The NOEC was found to be 250 mg test item per liter (nominal loading).The EC10and EC50of di(tetraethylammonium)hexahydroxoplatinate(IV) is 145 mg/L (95% CL: 43 – 239 mg/L) and >1000 mg/L (95% CL: >1000 – >1000), respectively, based on nominal loading.

Description of key information

A significant inhibition of bacterial respiration by di(tetraethylammonium)hexahydroxoplatinate(IV) started at a concentration of 500 mg per liter nominal loading. The NOEC is 250 mg test item per liter. The EC10 and EC50 of the test item is 145 mg/L (95% CL: 43 – 239 mg/L) and >1000 mg/L (95% CL: >1000 – >1000), respectively, based on nominal loading.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for microorganisms:
1 000 mg/L

Additional information

An activated sludge respiration inhibition test was conducted with di(tetraethylammonium)hexahydroxoplatinate(IV). The study is reliable without restrictions, being GLP-compliant and having followed standard test guidelines (OECD 209 and EU Method C.11).

The test item was given to the synthetic sewage with a concentration of 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 mg Pt TEAH solution per liter. A positive control was used, and all validity criteria were met. Di(tetraethylammonium)hexahydroxoplatinate(IV) had a statistically significant effect on bacterial respiration. Starting at a loading of 500 mg/L, the test item inhibited the respiration of the inoculum significantly. The NOEC was found to be 250 mg test item per liter (nominal loading).The EC10and EC50of di(tetraethylammonium)hexahydroxoplatinate(IV) is 145 mg/L (95% CL: 43 – 239 mg/L) and >1000 mg/L (95% CL: >1000 – >1000), respectively, based on nominal loading.