Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12 March 2018 - 16 May 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
Version / remarks:
October 02, 2012
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.20 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
Version / remarks:
No. 440/2008
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
- Concentrations: Control and 100 mg/L loading rate
- Sampling method: Duplicate samples were taken on days 0, 5, 12 and 19 (fresh test solutions) and 2, 7, 14 and 21 (old test solutions)
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: The samples were stored frozen prior to analysis.
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: A nominal amount of test item (500 mg) was added to the surface of 5 litres of test water to give the 100 mg/L loading rate. After the addition of the test item, the test water was stirred by magnetic stirrer using a stirring rate such that a vortex was formed to give a dimple at the water surface. The stirring was stopped after 95 hours and the mixture allowed to stand for 1 hour. With the exception of the WAF preparation on Day 12 which showed no microscopic particles to be visible, microscopic observations made on the WAF indicated that a significant amount of dispersed test item was present in the water column and hence it was considered justifiable to remove the dispersed material by filtering the WAF through a glass wool plug (2 to 4 cm in length). On Day 12 the WAF was filtered through a glass wool plug (2 to 4 cm in length) as a precautionary measure. A wide bore glass tube, covered at one end with Nescofilm was submerged into the vessel, sealed end down, to a depth of approximately 5 cm from the bottom of the vessel. A length of Tygon tubing was inserted into the glass tube and pushed through the Nescofilm seal. A glass wool plug was inserted into the opposite end of the tubing and the WAF removed by mid-depth siphoning (the first approximate 75 to 100 mL discarded) to give the 100 mg/L loading rate WAF. Microscopic observations of the WAF were performed after filtering and showed a clear colorless solution with no microdispersions of test item to be present.

Preliminary work was carried out to determine whether stirring for a prolonged period produced significantly higher measured test concentrations in the WAF. It was concluded that increasing the stirring period did increase the amount of dissolved test item in the WAF between the 24-hour and 96-hour preparation periods and so preparation of the WAF was maintained at a 95-hour stirring period followed by a 1-hour standing period.

- Controls: Untreated test media
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc.): Microscopic observations of the WAF were performed after filtering and showed a clear colorless solution with no microdispersions of test item to be present.
Test organisms (species):
Daphnia magna
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna
- Strain/clone: Not reported
- Source: In-house laboratory culture
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): 1st instar < 24 hours old
- Feeding during test Yes
- Food type: Algal suspension and Tetramin® flake food suspension.
- Amount: Algal suspension (Desmodesmus subspicatus) and Tetramin® flake food suspension daily. Feeding was at a level of approximately 0.1 to 0.2 mg carbon/daphnid/day, dependent on the age and size of the animal.
- Frequency: Daily

ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: None

METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF EARLY INSTARS OR OTHER LIFE STAGES: Gravid adults were isolated the day before initiation of the test, such that the young daphnids produced overnight were less than 24 hours old. These young were removed from the cultures and used for testing.
Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
yes
Total exposure duration:
21 d
Post exposure observation period:
None
Hardness:
250 to 266 mg/L as CaCO3
Test temperature:
20 - 22 °C
pH:
7.7 - 8.4
Dissolved oxygen:
8.4 to 10.2 mg O2/L
Salinity:
Not applicable
Conductivity:
Not reported
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal loading rate: 100 mg/L
Measured:0.00729 to 0.0126 mg/L
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Glass vessel
- Type: closed
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 100 mL of the test preparation in 150 mL glass vessels which were then covered with a plastic lid to reduce evaporation
- Aeration: No
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): Not applicable
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): Three times per week
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Elendt M7 media prepared according to guideline
- Total organic carbon: Not reported
- Culture medium different from test medium: No
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Dissolved oxygen concentrations, pH and temperature were recorded before and after each test media renewal. The temperature was also measured every hour in one replicate of the control. The water hardness of the control and the highest test concentration in the fresh and old media was measured once per week.

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: None
- Photoperiod: 16 hours light and 8 hours darkness with 20 to 30 minute dawn and dusk transition periods
- Light intensity:880 - 1320 Lux

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : On a daily basis the numbers of live and dead of the "Parental" (P1) generation, the numbers of live and dead "Filial" (F1) Daphnia and the number of discarded unhatched eggs were counted. An assessment was also made of the general condition and size of the parental daphnia as compared with the controls. At the end of the test, the length of each surviving parent animal was determined

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: Not applicable
- Range finding study: Yes
- Test concentrations: 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L loading rates
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Yes
Reference substance (positive control):
not specified
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Remarks:
Paternal generation
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
immobilisation
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOELR
Effect conc.:
100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Details on results:
- Behavioural abnormalities: None reported
- Observations on body length and weight: Daily observations of the 100 mg/L test group recorded one Daphnia being observed as small, on five observations. After 21 days the length of each surviving adult was determined. The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences (P≥0.05) between the control and the 100 mg/L test group in terms of length of the daphnids after 21 days exposure to the test item.
- Other biological observations: Daily observations of the 100 mg/L test group recorded two observations of parental generation Daphnia being pale in coloration, and one observation of a Daphnia coated with algae.
- Mortality of control: 0
- Other adverse effects control: None reported
- Abnormal responses: None reported
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: None reported; After siphoning and for the duration of the test, the control and 100 mg/L loading rate WAF test group were observed to be clear, colourless solutions.
Reported statistics and error estimates:
An estimate of the 21-Day EL50 value was given by inspection of the immobilization data. The EL50 (reproduction) value after 21 days was estimated by inspection of the data. For the estimation of the LOEL and the NOEL, the numbers of live young produced per adult over the duration of the test for the control and 100 mg/L test group were compared using a Two-sample t-test Procedure. Results from the control and 100 mg/L test group daphnia length data, determined for the surviving daphnids on termination of the test, were compared using a Two-sample t-test Procedure.

Table 1: Summary of the Lethal Effects on the Parental Generation (P1)

 Endpoint  Concentration (mg/L)  95 % Confidence Limits
 Immobilisation EL10  > 100  Not determined
 EL20  > 100  Not determined
 EL50  > 100  Not determined
 No Observed Effect Loading Rate  100  -
 Lowest Observed Effect Loading Rate  > 100  

Table 2: Summary of the Sub-lethal Effects on the Parental Generation (P1)

 Endpoint  Concentration (mg/L)  95 % Confidence Limits
 Body Length EL10  > 100  Not determined
 EL20  > 100  Not determined
 EL50  > 100  Not determined
 No Observed Effect Loading Rate  100  -
 Lowest Observed Effect Loading Rate  >100  

Table 3: Summary on the Effects on Reproduction

 Endpoint  Concentration (mg/L)  95 % Confidence Limits
 Body Length EL10  > 100  Not determined
 EL20  > 100  Not determined
 EL50  > 100  Not determined
 No Observed Effect Loading Rate  100  -
 Lowest Observed Effect Loading Rate  > 100  -

Table 4: Range-finding test data

 Nominal Loading Rate

(mg/L)

 Percentage Immobilization After 10 days exposure  Sub-lethal effect  Average Number of Live Young in First brood
 Control  None  13.6
 1.0  40  Pale  8.0
 10  60  Pale  7.0
 100  80  Pale  8.0

 Nominal Loading Rate

(mg/L)

 Percentage Immobilization After 10 days exposure  Sub-lethal effect  Average Number of Live Young in First brood
 Control  100  None  0.0*ǂ
 1.0  Small  11.0*
 10  0  Pale  10.2
 100  0  Small & Pale  13.6

*Based on four replactes as one replicate recorded as being male

ǂ All parental daphnia died by Day 4, hence no offspring produced

Table 5: Summary of Findings Following the Exposure of Daphnia magna for 21 days

 Nominal Loading Rate   

(mg/L) WAF

 Parental (P1 Generation Mortalities      

(Initial Population = 10)

 Total Number of Live Young   Number of Live Young from Parents Surviving to the End of the Test  Number of Live Young at the End of the Test Excluding Parents that were Accidental or Inadvertent Mortalities
 Total  Accidental  Inadvertant  Total  Average per Parent  Total  Average Per Parent
Control   0  0  0  1734  1734  173  1734  173
 100  1  0  1  1592  1580  176  1580  176

 

Table 6: Summary of Daily Observations

 Day  Nominal Loading Rate Concentration
 Control  100
 Adults Surviving  Live Young  Adults Surviving  Live Young
 1  10  0  10  0
 2  10  0  10  0
 3  10  0  10  0
 4  10  0  10  0
 5  10  0  10  0
 6  10  0  10  0
 7  10  0  10  0
 8  10  0  10  0
 9  10  0  9  25
 10  10  159  9  127
 11  10  0  9  0
 12  10  24  9  103
 13  10  242  9  142
 14  10  0  9  0
 15  10  367  9  376
 16  10  91  9  38
 17  10  0  9  0
 18  10  325  9  306
 19  10  191  9  87
 20  10  0  9  0
 21  10  335  9  388
 Totals  10  1734  9  1592

Table 7: Total Cumulative Production of Live Young

Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L)  Day
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
 Control  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  159
 100  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  25  152

 Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L)  Day
 11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21
 Control  159  183  425  425  792  883  883  1208  1399  1399  1734
 100  152  255  397  397  773  811  811  1117  1204  1204  1592

Table 8: Body Length of Surviving Adults at Day 21

Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L)  Individual Daphnia Lengths (mm)    
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Av  SD
 Control  4.4  4.5  4.1  4.3

 4.7

 4.4  4.5  4.8  4.7  4.5  4.5  0.21
 100  4.4  3.9  4.5  4.2  -  4.5  4.5  4.4  4.3  4.9  4.4  0.27

Av = Average

SD = Standard Deviation

- = No measurement, Daphnia died during the test

Table 9: Water Quality Measurements

 Day  Control      100 mg/L    
   mg O2/L  pH  Temperature (°C)  mg O2/L  pH  Temperature (°C)
 0  8.7  7.9  21  8.6

 7.8

 22
 2*  9.1  7.7  20  9.2  7.9  21
 2+  8.7  7.9  21  8.5  7.9  22
 5*  9.4  8.1  20  10.1  8.4  20
 5+  9.2  8.0  21  8.9  8.2  21
 7*  9.1  8.1  20  9.0  8.1  21
 7+  8.8  8.1  20  8.8  8.1  21
 9*  9.1  8.2  20  9.1  8.1  20
 9+  9.0  7.9  21  8.9  7.9  21
 12*  9.2  8.2  21  9.0  8.1  21
 12+  9.0  8.1  21  8.9  8.1  21
 14*  9.1  8.1  21  9.0  8.1  21
 14+  8.7  8.0  22  8.4  8.1  22
 16 *  8.9  8.1  21  8.5  8.1  21
 16+  9.2  8.2  20  9.1  8.2  21
 19 *  10.2  8.1  20  9.9  8.2  20
 19+  8.9  8.1  21  8.9  8.2  21
 21  9.9  8.1  20  9.5  8.1  20

*Before renewal

+After renewal

Table 10: Water Hardness Measurements

 Day  Water Hardness (mg/L as CaCO3
 Control  Highest Surviving Test Conditions
 0 (Fresh media)  256  258
 2 (Old media)  262  258
 5 (Fresh media)  250  256
 7 (Old media)  252  260
 12 (Fresh media)  260  260
 14 (Old media)  264  264
 19 (Fresh media)  256  258
 21 (Old media)  262  266

Table 11: Light Intensity Measurements

 Day  Light Intensity (Lux)
 0  880
 1  890
 2  929
 3  980
 4  975
 5  946
 6  1167
 7  1142
 8  1320
 9  1159
 10  1151
 11  928
 12  1017
 13  1068
 14  996
 15  1069
 16  1078
 17  1108
 18  1163
 19  1289
 20  1346
 21  1068

Table 12: Concentrations in test samples

 Time point (Days)  Nominal Loading Rate [Cnom] (mg/L WAF)  Sample Preparation Factor [F]  Determined Concentration [c] (mg/L)
 0 (fresh)  Control  0.2  <LOQ
 100  0.4  0.00929
 2 (old)  Control  0.2  <LOQ
 100  0.2  0.0103
 5 (fresh)  Control  0.2  <LOQ
 100  0.4  0.0126
 7 (old)  Control  0.2  <LOQ
 100  0.2  0.0111
 12 (fresh)  Control  0.2  <LOQ
 100  0.4  0.00909
 14 (old)  Control  0.2  <LOQ
 100  0.2  0.00932
 19 (fresh)  Control  0.2  <LOQ
 100  0.4  0.00729
 21 (old)  Control  0.2  <LOQ
 100  0.2  0.00874

LOQ = Limit of Quantification

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The 21-Day EL50 (immobilization) value for the parental daphnia generation (P1) and the 21-Day EL50 (reproduction) were >100 mg/L, based on nominal loading rates. The No Observed Effect Loading Rate based on nominal loading rates was 100 mg/L, the only concentration tested.
Executive summary:

The long-term toxicity of the test item to Daphnia magna was determined in a study following OECD 211 and EC C.20 guidelines. The study was conducted as a limit test at a nominal loading rate of 100 mg test item/L, prepared as a water accommodated fraction, based on the results of a preliminary study. Test solutions were renewed 3 times per week. Test concentrations were analysed and determined to be between 0.00729 mg/L and 0.0126 mg/L over the course of the study. On a daily basis the numbers of live and dead of the "Parental" (P1) generation, the numbers of live and dead "Filial" (F1) Daphnia and the number of discarded unhatched eggs were counted. An assessment was also made of the general condition and size of the parental daphnia as compared with the controls. At the end of the test, the length of each surviving parent animal was determined. The 21-Day EL50 (immobilization) value for the parental daphnia generation (P1) and the 21-Day EL50 (reproduction) were >100 mg/L, based on nominal loading rates. The No Observed Effect Loading Rate based on nominal loading rates was 100 mg/L, the only concentration tested. Given that the toxicity cannot be attributed to a single component or a mixture of components, but to the test substance as a whole, the results are reported based on nominal loading rates only.

 

The study is a GLP compliant, guideline experimental study and is fully acceptable for assessment of this endpoint.

Description of key information

The long-term toxicity to Daphnia magna has been assessed for one substance within the TDI-II category definition. The study was conducted using a water accommodated fraction as the test item is a poorly soluble UVCB. The determined EL50 values, based on parental mortality and reproduction, were >100 mg/L, with a NOELR value of 100 mg/L, the only concentration tested. Based on these results, members of the TDI-II category are not expected to be toxic to aquatic invertebrates at the limit of solubility.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Fresh water invertebrates

Fresh water invertebrates
Effect concentration:
100 mg/L

Additional information

A study was performed to assess the long-term toxicity of the Reaction mass of aniline and m-tolylidene diisocyanate to Daphnia magna (Sacker 2018). The results from this study are read across to other members of the polyurea TDI-II category.

The method followed was designed to be compatible with the OECD guideline 211, "Daphnia magna, Reproduction Test". Following preliminary range-finding tests, ten daphnids (ten replicates of one animal) were exposed to a Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF), at a single nominal loading rate of 100 mg/L, with test media renewal three times per week. The stirring period for the WAF preparation was validated in a preliminary study before the main test. The study was conducted with 21 days exposure. Test concentrations were analysed and determined to be between 0.00729 mg/L and 0.0126 mg/L over the course of the study. On a daily basis the numbers of live and dead of the "Parental" (P1) generation, the numbers of live and dead "Filial" (F1) Daphnia and the number of discarded unhatched eggs were counted. An assessment was also made of the general condition and size of the parental Daphnia as compared with the controls. At the end of the test, the length of each surviving parent animal was determined.

The 21-Day EL50 (immobilization) value for the parental daphnia generation (P1) and the 21-Day EL50 (reproduction) were >100 mg/L, based on nominal loading rates. The No Observed Effect Loading Rate based on nominal loading rates was 100 mg/L, the only concentration tested. Given that the toxicity cannot be attributed to a single component or a mixture of components, but to the test substance as a whole, the results were based on nominal loading rates only.