Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
06 Mar 1992 - 02 Feb 1993
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1993
Report date:
1993

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 81-6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The LLNA was not yet validated at the time of the study.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,3-bis((2-mercaptoethyl)thio)-1-propanethiol
EC Number:
411-290-7
EC Name:
2,3-bis((2-mercaptoethyl)thio)-1-propanethiol
Cas Number:
131538-00-6
Molecular formula:
C7 H16 S5
IUPAC Name:
2,3-bis((2-mercaptoethyl)thio)-1-propanethiol

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Pirbright-Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source:
Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany
- Weight at study initiation:
test group: 342.6 ± 19.63 g; vehicle controls: 342.3 ± 17.62 g
- Housing:
1 - 4 per cage, Makrolon Type IV
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):
Altromin tpf 3022, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Quarantine: 6 day

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):
21 ± 2 °C
- Humidity (%): 45 - 65%
- Air changes (per hr): 12 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):
12 / 12
- IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1992-08-04 To: 1992-09-24

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
paraffin oil
Concentration / amount:
0.2%
Day(s)/duration:
Day 0
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
1.0%
Day(s)/duration:
Day 7, 48 h
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
0.005%
Day(s)/duration:
Day 21, 24 h
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
22
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Intradermal: 0.2%, 1%, 5%, 10% w/w in paraffin oil
Topical: 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.2%, 1%, 4%, 10%, 25% w/w in petrolatum
Challenge controls:
22 naive (sham-induced) animals
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
DNCB, 0.1% (ethanol), 1.0% (petrolatum), 0.025% (petrolatum) for intradermal induction, topical induction, and challenge, respectively.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
22/22 of animals showed skin reactions

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0.005%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
22
Clinical observations:
none
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0.005%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
22
Clinical observations:
none
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.005%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
22
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.005%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
22
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.025%
No. with + reactions:
22
Total no. in group:
22
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.025%
No. with + reactions:
22
Total no. in group:
22
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the GPMT results, DMPT is not a skin sensitizer.