Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14 August 2012- 15 August 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP compliant study conducted in accordance with international guidelines.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): EP-4000S, Chemical name: Phenol, 4-4’-(1-methylethylidene)bis-, polymer with 2-(chloromethyl)oxirane and 2- methyloxirane
- Physical state: Light yellow liquid
- Analytical purity: 100%
- Lot/batch No.: 902Y1
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 07 December 2012
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: bovine eyes
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
The bovine eyes were excised and collected as soon after slaughter as possible (excised at 12.30 hours, 14 August 2012).
Excised eyes were maintained and transported to the laboratory, at ambient temperature, in sufficient HBSS, containing 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin solution, to cover all the eyes in the receptacle.
The eyes were used within 4 hours of slaughter.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: Concurrent positive and negative control corneas were examined
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 µL
- Concentration (if solution): neat

Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 minutes (± 30 seconds)
Observation period (in vivo):
Following incubation, the positive and negative controls were removed and the epithelial surface of the cornea washed, at least three times or until the wash medium (EMEM with phenol red) was clear and there was no discolouration. The wash medium was added via the holes on the top of the holder. After each wash, the wash medium was removed using a pipette tip attached to a vacuum pump.
As the test substance, EP-4000S, was very viscous, it was not possible to remove using the vacuum pump. The anterior glass was removed and the corneas were gently washed with EMEM without phenol red until there was no discolouration of the wash medium. The anterior glass was then replaced.

Following completion of the two hour incubation period, the medium was removed from both compartments and replaced with fresh cMEM. The posterior compartment was re-plugged and the opacity of each cornea measured and recorded.
The opacity values obtained at this stage were used in calculating the final In Vitro Irritancy Score.

Throughout the assay the corneas were examined for opaque spots or other irregularities.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Corneas were treated in triplicate with either the test substance, positive control (1% w/v sodium hydroxide) or negative control (0.9% sodium chloride solution).
Details on study design:
The assay uses isolated bovine corneas as a means of assessing the ocular corrosivity or severe irritancy potential of test substances in vitro.
The isolated corneas were obtained as a by-product of the meat production industry. Two endpoints, corneal opacity and permeability,
were measured and combined to give an In Vitro Irritancy Score.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
other: Opacity
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 10 min
Score:
-0.333
Remarks on result:
other: SD=1.528
Irritation parameter:
other: Permeability OD 490
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 10min
Score:
-0.004
Remarks on result:
other: SD=0.013
Irritation parameter:
other: In Vitro Irritancy
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 10min
Score:
-0.4
Remarks on result:
other: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVS) was calculated as: (Opacity +(15x Corrected OD 490)
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Throughout the assay the corneas were examined for opaque spots or other irregularities.
Following treatment with test substance, EP-4000S, the corneas were noted as clear. The corneas treated with the positive control, sodium hydroxide 1% (w/v), were very opaque and the corneas treated with the negative control, 0.9% saline, were clear.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The positive control, sodium hydroxide (1%), elicited an In Vitro Irritancy Score of 131.4.

This value was within the historical range (mean ± 2 x SD = 82.3 – 144.7) for the assays performed to date.

The negative control, 0.9% saline, opacity mean change value was 1.0 which was below the maximum acceptance value of 2.0.

The permeability mean of the negative control was 0.028 which was below the maximum acceptance value of 0.1.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The test substance, EP-4000S, elicited an In Vitro Irritancy Score of -0.4 ± 1.7 and was predicted to be a non-corrosive/ non-severe eye irritant.