Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Surface tension

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
surface tension
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
24/04/2008-19/09/2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted in compliance with GLP and agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of relevant results.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.5 (Surface Tension)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The surface tension result was not corrected using the Harkins-Jordan correction table as the correction is not applicable to the apparatus used
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Deviation:
The surface tension result was not corrected using the Harkins-Jordan correction table as the correction is not applicable to the apparatus used. Once calibrated, the balance and ring assembly used in this test give a direct reading for the surface rension that is within the required accuracy (+/- 0.5 mN/m); this is as a result of the reduced ring dimensions.
This deviation has been considered not to have affected the integrity of the study.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Date of Signature: 15/10/2007; Date of Inspection: 21/08/2007
Type of method:
ring method
Surface tension:
50.5 mN/m
Temp.:
22 °C
Remarks on result:
other: The surface tension of a solution containing 0.300 g/l of constituent 1 and 7.71 x 10-2 g/l of constituent 2 was determined

Sample solution concentration

The mean peak areas for each component relating to the standard and sample solutions are shown in the following tables:

component 1

Solution

MeanArea

Standard 46.2 mg/l

650.138

Standard 44.8 mg/l

616.894

Sample

471.565

Sample solution concentration = 0.272 g/l

Sample solution concentration (corrected for recovery) = 0.300 g/l

component 2

Solution

MeanArea

Standard 89.3 mg/l

1.158 x 103

Standard 86.7 mg/l

1.105 x 103

Sample

49.955

Sample solution concentration = 3.11 x 10-2g/l

Sample solution concentration (corrected for recovery) = 7.71 x 10-2g/l

 


Calibration factor (f)

The readings, temperatures and the corresponding calibration factors for glass double-distilled water are shown in the following table:

Reading (mN/m)

Temperature (ºC)

Literature Value (mN/m)

Calibration Factor

72.5

22.0

72.41

0.999

72.5

22.0

72.41

0.999

72.5

22.0

72.41

0.999

72.5

22.0

72.41

0.999

72.5

22.0

72.41

0.999

72.5

22.0

72.41

0.999

Mean Calibration Factor = 0.999

Sample solution readings

The readings, times and temperatures for the sample solution are shown in the following table:

Time (mins)

Reading (mN/m)

Temperature (ºC)

63

50.5

22.0

69

50.5

22.0

79

50.5

22.0

85

50.5

22.0

91

50.5

22.0

Mean reading                    :   50.5 mN/m
Surface tension                  = reading x calibration factor
                                         = 50.5 x 0.999
                                         = 50.5 mN/m
Temperature                      :   22.0 ± 0.5ºC
pH of sample solution        :   6.3

Validation

See Water Solubility Section.

 

Conclusions:
The surface tension of a solution with a loading rate of 1.162 g/L (resulting in 0.300 g/l of constituent 1 and 7.71 x 10^-2 g/l of constituent 2) has been determined to be 50.5 mN/m at 22.0°C ± 0.5°C. The test material is considered to be a surface-active material.
Executive summary:

The surface tension of the test material was determined using a White Electrical Institute interfacial tension balance and a procedure based on the ISO 304 ring method. With the exception of the following deviation, the experimental procedure used complied with that specified in Method A5 of Commission Directive 92/69/EEC (which constitutes Annex V of Council Directive 67/548/EEC).

1) The surface tension result was not corrected using the Harkins-Jordan correction table as the correction is not applicable to the apparatus used. Once calibrated, the balance and ring assembly used in this test give a direct reading for surface tension that is within the required accuracy (± 0.5 mN/m); this is as a result of the reduced ring dimensions.

This deviation has been considered not to have affected the integrity of the study.

 

The surface tension of a solution with a loading rate of 1.162 g/L (resulting in 0.300 g/l of constituent 1 and 7.71 x 10^-2 g/l of constituent 2) has been determined to be 50.5 mN/m at 22.0°C ± 0.5°C. The test material is considered to be a surface-active material.

Description of key information

50.5 mN/m at 22 °C with a loading rate of 1.162 g/L (resulting in 0.300 g/L of constituent 1 and 7.71 x 10^-2 g/L of constituent 2), EU Method A.5, Butler & White (2008)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Surface tension:
50.5
in mN/m at 20°C and concentration in mg/L:
1 162

Additional information

The surface tension of the test material was determined in the key study (Butler & White 2008) using a White Electrical Institute interfacial tension balance and a procedure based on the ISO 304 ring method. With the exception of the following deviation, the experimental procedure used complied with that specified in Method A5 of Commission Directive 92/69/EEC (which constitutes Annex V of Council Directive 67/548/EEC).

The surface tension result was not corrected using the Harkins-Jordan correction table as the correction is not applicable to the apparatus used. Once calibrated, the balance and ring assembly used in this test give a direct reading for surface tension that is within the required accuracy (± 0.5 mN/m); this is as a result of the reduced ring dimensions. This deviation has been considered not to have affected the integrity of the study.

The study was therefore assigned a reliability score of 1 in accordance with the principles for assessing data quality as outlined in Klimisch et al. (1997). 

The surface tension of a solution with a loading rate of 1.162 g/L (resulting in 0.300 g/L of constituent 1 and 7.71 x 10 ^-2 g/L of constituent 2) has been determined to be 50.5 mN/m at 22.0 ± 0.5 °C. The test material is considered to be a surface-active material.