Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation, other
Remarks:
HRIPT Human Repeated Insult Patch Test
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1995
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1995
Report date:
1995

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: HRIPT 50 subjects
Deviations:
not specified
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Principle of test: Repeated Insult Patch Test 50 Subjects
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
patch test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Human data available

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Jojoba, ext., hydrogenated
EC Number:
296-292-4
EC Name:
Jojoba, ext., hydrogenated
Cas Number:
92457-12-0
Molecular formula:
No molecular formula is available since it is a UVCB substance
IUPAC Name:
Jojoba (Simmondsia Chinensis) Seed Oil Hydrogenated
Test material form:
solid: flakes

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
other: Human
Sex:
male/female

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results
Key result
Reading:
other: Readings at 24/48/72 h
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
test material dilutet to 10% in mineral oil, occlusive
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
53
Clinical observations:
one (I) subject exhibited a ± Ievel reaction at the 24 and 48 hour readings, which diminished to a zero (0) Ievel at the 72 hour reading.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the test population of fifty-three (53) subjects and under the conditions of this study, the test material demonstrated no potential for eliciting either dermal irritation or sensitization