Reaction Products of Dimethyl hydrogen phosphite and Alcohols C14-18, Even, Linear

Skin sensitisation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

02 December to 19 December 2014

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: There were no deviations (unplanned changes) from the study plan.

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2015

Report date:

2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)

Deviations:

no

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Type of study:

mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Test material form:

solid: compact

Details on test material:

Purity: 100%
Physical state / Appearance: white solid block
Expiry date: 03 November 2016
Storage Conditions: room temperature in the dark

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:

mouse

Strain:

CBA

Sex:

female

Details on test animals and environmental conditions:

Female CBA/Ca (CBA/CaOlaHsd) strain mice were nulliparous and non-pregnant.
Acclimatization period of at least five days.
Animals were in the weight range of 15 to 23 g, and were eight to twelve weeks old.
Free access to mains tap water and food.
The temperature and relative hlunidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25 °C and 30 to 70%, respectively.
The rate of air exchange was approximately fif teen changes per hour.
The lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06.00 to 18.00) and twelve hours darkness.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:

acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)

Concentration:

50%, 5% or 0.5% v/v in acetone/olive oil 4:1.

No. of animals per dose:

5

Details on study design:

Groups of five mice were treated with the test item at concentrations of 50%, 5% or 0.5% w/w in acetone/olive oil 4:1. The preliminary screening test suggested that the test item would not produce systemic toxicity or excessive local irritation at the highest suitable concentration. Daily application of 25 µL of the appropriate concentration of the test item to the dorsal surface of each ear for three consecutive days.
The test item formulation was administered using an automatic micropipette and spread over the dorsal surface of the ear using the tip of the pipette.
A further group of five mice received the vehicle alone in the same manner.

Five hours following the administration of 3HTdR all mice were killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation followed by cervical separation.
Preparation of Single Cell Suspension: A single cell suspension of the lymph node cells for each individual animal was prepared by gentle mechanical disaggregation. The lymph node cells were rinsed through the gauze with 4 mL of PBS into a petri dish labeled with the study number and dose concentration. he lymph node cells suspension was transferred to a centrifuge tube. The petri dish was washed with an additional 5 mL of PBS to remove all remaining lymph node cells and these were added to the centrifiige tube. The lymph node cells were pelleted at 1400 rpm (approximately 190 g) for ten minutes. The pellet was re-suspended in 10 mL of PBS and re-pelleted. To precipitate out the radioactive material, the pellet was re-suspended in3 mL of 5%Trichloroacetic acid (TCA).
3HTdR incorporation was measured by B-scintillation counting. The number of radioactive disintegrations per minute was then measured.

Clinical Observations: All animals were observed twice daily on Days 1, 2 and 3 and on a daily basis on Days 4, 5 and 6. Any signs of toxicity or signs of ill health during the test were recorded.
Body Weights: The body weight of each mouse was recorded on Day 1 (prior to closing) and Day 6 (prior to termination).

Positive control substance(s):

hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Statistics:

Data was processed to give group mean values for disintegrations per minute and standard deviations where appropriate. Individual and group mean disintegrations per minute values were assessed for dose response relationships by analysis of homogeneity of variance followed by one
way analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the event of a significant result from the ANOVA, pairwise comparisons were performed between control and treated groups. For homogenous datasets Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test was used and for non-homogenous datasets Dunnett’s T3 Multiple Comparison Method was used.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:

25% v/v of the positive control in acetone/olive oil 4:1 gives positive results with a stimulation Index score of 8.47

In vivo (LLNA)

Results

Results 1

Parameter:

SI

Remarks on result:

other: see Remark

Remarks:

0.5% v/v of the test item in acetone/olive oil 4:1 gives negative results with a stimulation Index score of 0.85 5% v/v of the test item in acetone/olive oil 4:1 gives negative results with a stimulation Index score of 1.94 50% v/v of the test item in acetone/olive oil 4:1 gives positive results with a stimulation Index score of 3.73

Results 2

Parameter:

other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)

Remarks on result:

other: see Remark

Remarks:

Five days following the first topical application of the test item, vehicle control or positive control item (Day 6) all mice were injected via the tail vein with 250 pL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 3H-methyl thymidine (3HTdR: 80 µCi/rnL, specific activity 20 Ci/mmoL) giving a total of 20µCi to each mouse.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

sensitising

Remarks:

Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU

Conclusions:

The test item was considered to be a sensitizer under the conditions of the test.
alpha-Hexylcinnarnaldehyde, tech., 85% gave a Stimulation Index of greater than 3 (8.47) when tested at a concentration of 25% v/v in acetone/olive oil 4:1 thus demonstrating the sensitivity
and reliability of the test system.

Executive summary:

GUIDELINE

A study was performed to assess the skin sensitization potential of the test item in the CBA/Ca strain mouse following topical application to the dorsal surface of the ear.

METHODS

Following a preliminary screening test in which no clinical signs of toxicity were noted at a concentration of 50%, this concentration was selected as the highest dose investigated in the main test of the Local Lymph Node Assay. Three groups, each of five animals, were treated with 50 µL (25 µL per ear) of the undiluted test item or the test item as a solution in acetone/olive oil 4:1 at concentrations of 50%, 5% or 0.5% V/V. A further group of five animals was treated with acetone/olive oil 4:1 alone. A concurrent positive control test, using a group of five animals, was also performed with the known sensitizer, alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde tech., 85%, at a concentration of 25% v/v in acetone/olive oil 4: 1

The Stimulation Index expressed as the mean radioactive incorporation for each treatment group divided by the mean radioactive incorporation of the vehicle control group are as follows:

0.5% v/v of the test item in acetone/olive oil 4:1 gives negative results with a stimulation Index score of 0.85

5% v/v of the test item in acetone/olive oil 4:1 gives negative results with a stimulation Index score of 1.94

50% v/v of the test item in acetone/olive oil 4:1 gives positive results with a stimulation Index score of 3.73

25% v/v of the positive control in acetone/olive oil 4:1 gives positive results with a stimulation Index score of 8.47

The concentration of test item expected to cause a 3 fold increase in 3HTdR incorporation (EC3 value) was calculated to be 31.6%.

CONCLUSION

The test item was considered to be a sensitizer under the conditions of the test. Alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde, tech., 85% gave a Stimulation Index of greater than 3 when tested at a concentration of 25% v/v in acetone/olive oil 4:1 thus demonstrating the sensitivity and reliability ofthe test system.