Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Acute toxicity, oral, similar to OECD guideline 401, rats: LD50 = 8014 mg/kg bw

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Some details of the experimental conditions are missing (test substance, animal conditions, bodyweights) but the main useful data are described.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Some details of the experimental conditions are missing (test substance, animal conditions, bodyweights) but the main useful data are described.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Rats were treated with test item, Juniper tar by oral gavage and then observed for clinical signs and mortality for two weeks. LD50 was computed by the method of Litchfield & Wilcoxon (1949).
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
pre-GLP
Limit test:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
No data
Species:
rat
Strain:
Osborne-Mendel
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Fasting period before study: 18 h prior to treatment
- Diet: Food, ad libitum
- Water, ad libitum
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
No data
Doses:
No data
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 animals evenly divided by sex for the whole experiment
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 2 weeks
Statistics:
LD50 with 95 % confidence limits was calculated with use of Litchfield-Wilcoxon's method (1949).
Preliminary study:
None
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
8 014 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
>= 6 550 - <= 9 770
Mortality:
Mortality was observed between 4 h and 4 days after test item administration.
Clinical signs:
other: Depression soon after treatment, scrawny appearance for several days and irritated gastrointestinal tract.
Gross pathology:
No data
Other findings:
None

None

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the test conditions, the oral LD50 for Juniper tar is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw in rats therefore it is not classified according to the CLP Regulation (EC) N° (1272-2008).
Executive summary:

In an acute oral toxicity study, young adult Osborne-Mendel rats were treated with undiluted Juniper tar by oral gavage and then observed for clinical signs and mortality for two weeks. LD50 was computed by the method of Litchfield & Wilcoxon (1949).

Mortality was observed between 4 h and 4 days after test item administration with depression soon after treatment, scrawny appearance for several days and irritated gastrointestinal tract. In this study, the oral LD50 of test item was 8014 mg/kg bw (95 % Cl: 6550-9770) in rats.

 

Under the test conditions, the oral LD50 for Juniper tar is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw in rats therefore it is not classified according to the CLP Regulation (EC) N° (1272-2008).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
8 014 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Some details of the experimental conditions are missing (test substance, animal conditions, bodyweights) but the main useful data are described.

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Acute toxicity: via oral route

In an acute oral toxicity study, young adult Osborne-Mendel rats were treated with undiluted Juniper tar by oral gavage and then observed for clinical signs and mortality for two weeks. LD50 was computed by the method of Litchfield & Wilcoxon (1949).

Mortality was observed between 4 h and 4 days after test item administration with depression soon after treatment, scrawny appearance for several days and irritated gastrointestinal tract. In this study, the oral LD50 of test item was 8014 mg/kg bw (95 % Cl: 6550-9770) in rats.


Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Only one study is available.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Harmonized classification:

Cade oil has no harmonized classification according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.

Self-classification:

Acute toxicity via Oral route:

Based on the available information, Cade oil is:

- not classified according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 as the LD50 is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity via Dermal route:This information is not available

Acute toxicity via Inhalation:This information is not available.

Specific target organ toxicity: single exposure (Oral):

The classification criteria according to the Annex VI of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 as specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure, oral are not met since no reversible or irreversible adverse health effects were observed immediately or delayed after exposure and no effects were observed at the guidance value (oral) for a Category 1 classification (C ≤ 300 mg/kg bw) and at the guidance value (oral) for a Category 2 classification (2000 mg/kg bw ≥ C > 300 mg/kg bw). No classification is required.

Specific target organ toxicity: single exposure (Dermal): This information is not available

Specific target organ toxicity: single exposure (Inhalation): This information is not available.

Based on its composition (< 10% of aspiration toxicants or hydrocarbons), Cade oil is not classified for aspiration hazard.