Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 289-296-2 | CAS number: 87061-04-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 21 December 1998 to 21 January 1999
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted in 1998 to 1999 in accordance with OECD Guideline 471/472 on the appropriate strains of bacteria (S. typhimuriumTA1535, TA100, TA1537 and TA98 as well as E. coli WP2uvrA in both the presence and absence of metabolic activation. Whilst not conducted to GLP the report does include a signature page confirming that the report accurately reflects the proceedings of the experiment signed by the laboratory manager. Neither the batch details nor the purity of the substance are reported. Concurrent controls were run as a part of the experiment. Six dose levels were tested during the study, however the experiments were run on duplicate rather than triplicate plates and whilst the study result in an unequivocally negative result, the experiment was not duplicated and no justification for this was given in the report. Despite its basic nature and some deviations from the approved guidelines the study can be considered to be reliable with restrictions.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 000
- Report date:
- 2000
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Plates were tested in duplicate not triplicate and the negative result was not confirmed
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 472 (Genetic Toxicology: Escherichia coli, Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Plates were tested in duplicate not triplicate and the negative result was not confirmed
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-[[5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)cyclohexyl]oxy]propane-1,2-diol
- EC Number:
- 289-296-2
- EC Name:
- 3-[[5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)cyclohexyl]oxy]propane-1,2-diol
- Cas Number:
- 87061-04-9
- Molecular formula:
- C13H26O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-{[5-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)cyclohexyl]oxy}propane-1,2-diol
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine synthesis in S. typhimurium strains, and tryptophan synthesis in the E. coli strain tested.
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Nutrient Broth No. 2 (Oxoid)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Nutrient Broth No. 2 (Oxoid)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range finding test: 0, 0.305, 1.22, 4.88, 19.5, 78.1, 313, 1250 and 5000 µg/plate
Main test: 0, 39.1, 78.1, 156, 313, 625 and 1250 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: 2-(2-furyl)-3- (5-nitro-2-furyl) acrylamide; 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Performed in duplicate
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: assessment of the bacterial lawn growth - Evaluation criteria:
- Plates were assessed for a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Observed at the two highest doses tested
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Observed at the two highest doses tested
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Based on the results of the range finding test, the maximum concentration selected for the main test was 1250 µg/plate as the test material caused a reduction in the growth of the bacterial lawn at concentrations above this dose. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Dose response curves for the number of revertants both with and without metabolic activation are presented in the attached figures.
Table 1: Results of the main test
Metabolic activation |
Test material concentration |
Replicate |
Number of revertant colonies per plate |
||||
Base-pair substitution |
Frameshift |
||||||
TA 100 |
TA 1535 |
WP-2uvrA |
TA 98 |
TA 1537 |
|||
- S9 Mix |
Solvent control |
R1 |
148 |
9 |
17 |
16 |
9 |
R2 |
156 |
7 |
17 |
12 |
14 |
||
Mean |
(152) |
(8) |
(17) |
(14) |
(12) |
||
39.1 |
R1 |
138 |
11 |
14 |
14 |
13 |
|
R2 |
160 |
13 |
15 |
17 |
6 |
||
Mean |
(149) |
(12) |
(15) |
(16) |
(10) |
||
78.1 |
R1 |
159 |
6 |
14 |
17 |
13 |
|
R2 |
155 |
11 |
18 |
15 |
11 |
||
Mean |
(157) |
(9) |
(16) |
(16) |
(12) |
||
156 |
R1 |
152 |
6 |
16 |
22 |
6 |
|
R2 |
152 |
8 |
22 |
14 |
9 |
||
Mean |
(152) |
(7) |
(19) |
(18) |
(8) |
||
313 |
R1 |
151 |
9 |
17 |
7 |
7 |
|
R2 |
166 |
8 |
19 |
7 |
8 |
||
Mean |
(159) |
(9) |
(18) |
(7) |
(8) |
||
625 |
R1 |
62* |
6* |
13* |
0* |
2* |
|
R2 |
82* |
4* |
10* |
5* |
2* |
||
Mean |
(72) |
(5) |
(12) |
(3) |
(2) |
||
1250 |
R1 |
0* |
0* |
0* |
0* |
0* |
|
R2 |
0* |
0* |
0* |
0* |
0* |
||
Mean |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
||
+ S9 Mix |
Solvent control |
R1 |
173 |
9 |
19 |
24 |
12 |
R2 |
165 |
9 |
19 |
23 |
11 |
||
Mean |
(169) |
(9) |
(19) |
(24) |
(12) |
||
39.1 |
R1 |
152 |
8 |
16 |
31 |
11 |
|
R2 |
167 |
8 |
1 |
28 |
11 |
||
Mean |
(160) |
(8) |
(16) |
(30) |
(11) |
||
78.1 |
R1 |
158 |
13 |
30 |
33 |
9 |
|
R2 |
198 |
16 |
11 |
26 |
13 |
||
Mean |
(178) |
(15) |
(21) |
(30) |
(11) |
||
156 |
R1 |
152 |
12 |
23 |
31 |
19 |
|
R2 |
164 |
16 |
26 |
30 |
9 |
||
Mean |
(158) |
(14) |
(25) |
(31) |
(14) |
||
313 |
R1 |
170 |
3 |
14 |
19 |
16 |
|
R2 |
163 |
8 |
11 |
28 |
15 |
||
Mean |
(167) |
(6) |
(13) |
(24) |
(16) |
||
625 |
R1 |
150* |
7* |
18* |
19* |
9* |
|
R2 |
128 |
5* |
23* |
18* |
4* |
||
Mean |
(117) |
(6) |
(21) |
(19) |
(7) |
||
1250 |
R1 |
122* |
7* |
12* |
15* |
3* |
|
R2 |
125 |
4* |
8* |
20* |
1* |
||
Mean |
(124) |
(6) |
(10) |
(18) |
(2) |
||
Positive controls - S9 Mix
|
Positive control substance |
AF-2 |
NaN3 |
AF-2 |
AF-2 |
9-AA |
|
Concentration (µg/plate) |
0.01 |
0.5 |
0.01 |
0.1 |
80 |
||
|
R1 |
486 |
488 |
93 |
264 |
259 |
|
R2 |
516 |
491 |
85 |
263 |
285 |
||
Mean |
(501) |
(490) |
(89) |
(264) |
(272) |
||
Positive controls + S9 Mix
|
Positive control substance |
2-AA |
2-AA |
2-AA |
2-AA |
2-AA |
|
Concentration (µg/plate) |
1.0 |
2.0 |
10 |
0.5 |
2.0 |
||
|
R1 |
826 |
286 |
1292 |
239 |
116 |
|
R2 |
867 |
311 |
1369 |
255 |
112 |
||
Mean |
(847) |
(299) |
(1331) |
(247) |
(114) |
||
AF-2 = 2-(2-furyl)-3- (5-nitro-2-furyl) acrylamide NaN3= sodium azide 9-AA = 9-aminoacridine 2-AA = 2 -aminoanthracene *Inhibition of bacterial growth |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative Both with and without metabolic activation
Under the conditions of the test, the test material was found to be negative for mutagenicity in both the S. typhimurium and E. coli strains tested in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
The mutagenicity of the test material was assessed using a bacterial reverse mutagenicity assay (Ames test). The study was performed in compliance with the current OECD guidelines 471 and 472 with a few minor deviations from the standard protocol. Under the conditions of the test, the test material was found to be negative in all strains tested both with and without metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.