Butanamide, 2,2'-[(3,3'-dichloro[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis(azo)]bis[3-oxo-, N,N'-bis(p-anisyl and Ph) derivs.

Endpoint summary

Description of key information

The test item, suspended in acetone:olive oil (4+1), was assessed for its possible contact allergenic potential. For this purpose a local lymph node assay was performed in mice (4 females per group) using test item concentrations of 2.5, 5, and 10%. The animals did not show any clinical signs during the course of the study and no cases of mortality were observed. Due to the colour of the test item redness of the ear skin could not be observed.

In this study Stimulation Indices (S.I.) of 1.50, 1.69, and 2.12 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 2.5, 5, and 10% in acetone:olive oil (4+1), respectively. The results obtained with the positive control confirmed the validity of the test.

The test item was not a skin sensitiser in this assay. Therefore, the test item has not to be classified as skin sensitiser according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Reference 1

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

From 06 NOV 2007 to 21 NOV 2007

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: guideline study (OECD TG 429)

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Remarks:

GLP according to Chemikaliengesetz and Directive 88/320/EEC

Type of study:

mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Species:

mouse

Strain:

CBA

Sex:

female

Details on test animals and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- strain: CBA/CaOlaHsd
- Source: Harlan Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 8-9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 18.7-22.4 g
- Housing: individually, Makrolon Type I cages
- Diet: pelleted standard died (Harlan Winkelmann, Borchen), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation: yes (no information on duration)

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs/12 hrs

Vehicle:

acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)

Concentration:

0, 2.5, 5, 10% (w/v)

No. of animals per dose:

4 females per dose group
2 females in the pre-test

Details on study design:

RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: 10% (w/v) suspension in acetone:olilve oil (4+1) was the highest technically applicable concentration; higher concentrations could also not be achieved with other vehicles
- Irritation: no visible irritation 24 hours after single application of test item concentrations of 1, 2.5, 5 and 10% (w/v); redness of the ear skin could not be evaluated due to the colour of the test item
- lymph node proliferation response: no data


MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: LLNA
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
1: exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of 3H-methyl thymidine at least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in control mice as indicated by the stimulation index
2: data are compatible with a conventional dose response, although allowance must be made for either local toxicity or immunological suppression

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
- individual preparation of weight volume dilutions using a magnetic stirrer as homogenizer
- test item preparations were made freshly before each dosing occasion
- 25 µl were spread over the entire dorsal surface of each ear lobe once daily for three consecutive days

Positive control substance(s):

hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Statistics:

- calculations of mean values and standard deviations for body weight

Positive control results:

Stimulation indices of 1.29, 3.03 and 6.32 were determined with the positve control substance at concentrations of 5%, 10% and 25% (w/v), respectively, in acetone:olive oil (4+1). An EC3 value of 9.9% (w/v) was calculated.

Key result

Parameter:

SI

Value:

>= 1.5 - <= 2.12

Test group / Remarks:

all

Remarks on result:

other: Stimulation indices were all below 3. The following SI were calcualted: 2.5% test item: 1.50 5. % test item: 1.69 10% test item: 2.12

Parameter:

other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)

Remarks on result:

other: see Remark

Remarks:

There was a dose dependent increase in the dpm, which were measured for the pooled lymph nodes of each treatment group (8 lymph nodes per dose group): Background: 84 or 19 dpm Control group: 4848 dpm 2.5% test item: 7234 dpm 5% test item: 8160 dpm 10% test item: 10233 dpm

The animals did not show any clinical signs during the course of the study and no cases of mortality were observed. Due to the colour of the test item redness of the ear skin could not be observed. Calculation of the EC3 value was not performed, because no test concentration produced a SI of 3 or higher.

Interpretation of results:

not sensitising

Remarks:

Migrated information

Conclusions:

The test substance was not sensitising in this LLNA in concentrations up to 10% (w/v) in acetone: olive oil (4+1), the highest technically achievable concentration.

Executive summary:

In the study the test item suspended in acetone:olive oil (4+1) was assessed for its possible contact allergenic potential. For this purpose a local lymph node assay was performed in mice (4 females per group) using test item concentrations of 2.5, 5, and 10%. The animals did not show any clinical signs during the course of the study and no cases of mortality were observed. Due to the colour of the test item redness of the ear skin could not be observed.

In this study Stimulation Indices (S.I.) of 1.50, 1.69, and 2.12 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 2.5, 5, and 10% in acetone:olive oil (4+1), respectively. The results obtained with the positive control confirmed the validity of the test.

The test item was not a skin sensitiser in this assay. Therefore, the test item has not to be classified as skin sensitiser according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.

Reference 2

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in chemico

Data waiving:

study scientifically not necessary / other information available

Justification for data waiving:

an in vitro skin sensitisation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin sensitisation study are available

Reference 3

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in vitro

Data waiving:

study scientifically not necessary / other information available

Justification for data waiving:

an in vitro skin sensitisation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin sensitisation study are available

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

No classification

In a LLNA study Stimulation Indices (S.I.) of 1.50, 1.69, and 2.12 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 2.5, 5, and 10% in acetone:olive oil (4+1), respectively. The test item was not a skin sensitiser in this assay. Therefore, the test item has not to be classified as skin sensitiser according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.