Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 265-512-0 | CAS number: 65140-91-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1983
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Meets generally accepted scientific standards, well documented and acceptable for assessment. No Purity of test substance available. Only one sampling time.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 983
- Report date:
- 1983
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Three Chinese hamsters per sex were treated each with 1250, 2500, and 5000 mg/kg bw test substance by gavage. Treatments were performed once daily on 2 consecutive days. Cyclophosphamide was used as a positive control substance, and a vehicle control was used as negative control. 24 h after the second treatment the animals were sacrificed and the bone marrow was prepared for scoring. 1000 bone marrow cells were scored per animal, and the following parameters were investigated: Single Jolly bodies, fragments of nuclei in erythrocytes, micronuclei in erythroblasts, micronuclei in leucopoietic cells, polyploid cells.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- QAU statement available
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Calcium diethyl bis[[[3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]methyl]phosphonate]
- EC Number:
- 265-512-0
- EC Name:
- Calcium diethyl bis[[[3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]methyl]phosphonate]
- Cas Number:
- 65140-91-2
- Molecular formula:
- C17 H29 O4 P. 1/2Ca
- IUPAC Name:
- calcium diethyl bis[[[3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]methyl]phosphonate]
- Details on test material:
- Purity: no data
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- hamster, Chinese
- Strain:
- other: Random Outbred Strain
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 6-10 weeks (females), 4-9 weeks (males)
- Weight at study initiation: 21-27 (females), 23-29 g (males)
- Housing: individual caging
- Diet: NAFAG, No. 924
- Water: Tap water, ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22-23
- Humidity (%): 61-70
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle: 0.5% Carboxymethylcellulose + 0.1% Tween 80
- Amount of vehicle: 20 mL/kg
- Manufactorer: CMC: Hercules Comp. U.S.A., Tw 80: Fluka AG, Switzerland. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 2 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily on 2 consecutive days
- Post exposure period:
- 24 h
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1250, 2500, 5000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide: 128 mg/kg bw in vehicle
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
Treatment once daily on 2 consecutive days. Sampling 24 h after second treatment.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Bone marrow was harvested from the shafts of both femurs. In a siliconized pipette filled with approx. 0.5 µl rat serum the bone marrow was drawn up. In order to receive a homogeneous suspension the content of pipette was aspirated gently about three times. Small drops of the mixture were transferred on the end of a slide, spread out by pulling it behind a polished cover glass and the preparations were air-dried. Three hours later, the slides were stained in undiluted May-Gruenwald solution for 2 min then in May-Gruenwald solution/water 1/1 for 2 min and then in Giemsa's, 40% for 20 min. After being rinsed in methanol 55% for 5-8 sec and washed off twice in water, they were left immersed in water for approx. 2 min. After rinsing with distilled water and air-drying, the slides were cleared in Xylol and mounted in Eukitt.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Scoring of the slides.
The slides of three female and three male animals each of the negative control group, the positive control group and of the groups treated with various doses of TK 11 578 were examined. 1000 bone marrow cells each were scored per animal and the following anomalies were registered:
a) Single Jolly bodies, b) fragments of nuclei in erythrocytes, c) micronuclei in erythroblasts, d) micronuclei in leucopoietic cells, e) polyploid cells. - Statistics:
- The significance of difference was assessed by Chi-Square test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- One male in each dose-group and 1 female of the intermediate dose group died.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- One male animal each of the low-dose, the intermediate-dose and the high-dose group and one female animal of the intermediate dose group died in the course of the experiment. In all dosage groups the percentage of cells displaying anomalies of nuclei did not differ significantly from the negative control (for details see table 1 "Any other information on results").
By contrast, the positive control (cyclophosphamide, 128 mg/kg bw) yielded a marked increase of the percentage of cells with anomalies. Here the mean percentage of anomalies was 11.4, whereas the negative control yielded a percentage of 0.08. The difference is highly significant (p<0.05).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Percent of cells with anomalies of nuclei, 24 h after second application of test substance.
|
Number of animals |
Sex of animals |
Single Jolly-Bodies |
Fragments of nuclei in erythrocytes |
Micronuclei in erythroblasts |
Micronuclei in leucopoietic cells |
Polyploid cells |
Totals |
Control |
1 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
2 |
F |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
3 |
F |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
4 |
M |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
5 |
M |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
6 |
M |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Cyclophosphamide, 128 mg/kg bw |
1 |
F |
12.0 |
2.9 |
1.9 |
0.3 |
|
17.1 |
|
2 |
F |
10.9 |
3.1 |
1.7 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
16.1 |
|
3 |
F |
4.2 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.1 |
|
5.9 |
|
4 |
M |
6.8 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
8.9 |
|
5 |
M |
8.9 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
|
10.6 |
|
6 |
M |
6.7 |
1.9 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
|
9.8 |
Test substance, 1250 mg/kg bw |
1 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
2 |
F |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
3 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
4 |
M |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
5 |
M |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
6 |
M |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Test substance, 2500 mg/kg bw |
1 |
F |
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
|
2 |
F |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
3 |
F |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
4 |
M |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
5 |
M |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
6 |
M |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Test substance, 5000 mg/kg bw |
1 |
F |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
2 |
F |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
3 |
F |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
4 |
M |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
5 |
M |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
6 |
M |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
It is concluded that under the conditions of this experiment, no evidence of mutagenic effects was obtained in Chinese hamsters. - Executive summary:
In a nucleus anomaly test groups of 3 male and 3 female Chinese hamsters were treated with 1'250, 2'500 and 5'000 mg/kg bw to (gavage) for 2 consecutive days and sacrificed 24 h later. One male animal each of the low-dose, the intermediate-dose and the high-dose group and one female animal of the intermediate dose group died in the course of the experiment. No induction of nuclear anomalies and/or chromosomal aberrations was observed in bone marrow cells in any of the dose groups. The incidence of bone marrow cells with anomalies of nuclei corresponds to the frequency observed in the control group. By contrast, a "positive control" experiment with cyclophosphamide (128 mg/kg) yielded 11.4% cells with anomalies of nuclei. This is significantly different from the controls treated with the vehicle (0.5% CMC + 0.1% Tween 80) alone. In conclusion, the test article is considered to be not mutagenic in this assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.