Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
4 Dec 2007
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ASTM E-1719-97 “Vapor Pressure Measurement by Ebuilliometry”
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
Test predates requirement for GLP compliance
Type of method:
dynamic method

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,1,3-trihydro-4,8-dioxaperfluorononanol
Cas Number:
958445-53-9
Molecular formula:
C7H4F12O3
IUPAC Name:
1,1,3-trihydro-4,8-dioxaperfluorononanol
Test material form:
liquid

Results and discussion

Vapour pressureopen allclose all
Key result
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.5 mm Hg
Temp.:
55 °C
Vapour pressure:
9.8 mm Hg

Any other information on results incl. tables

Linear regression was determined using Antoine equation:

Pvap, mmHg = exp[-2576.558494/(T°C+140) + 15.490704]; R² = 0.999999

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The vapor pressure of DONOL at 20 °C is 0.5 mmHg (ASTM E-1719-97).
Executive summary:

The vapor pressure of DONOL was measured using the dynamic method. Vapor pressure and temperature were measured at a variety of equilibrium points and fit to the Antoine equation. The extrapolated vapor pressure was then determined. The study was conducted in accordance with ASTM E-1719-97 but was not GLP compliant. Therefore, the study is classified as acceptable with restrictions.