Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Density

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
relative density
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
Experimental Starting Date: 03 December 2013 Experimental Completion Date: 10 March 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
Justification for type of information:
The hypothesis for the analogue approach is that the test substance Hydrocarbons, C10-C13, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics, contains constituents which are also constituents of the target substance, Hydrocarbons, C11-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics. The substances have overlapping constituents and therefore have qualitatively similar properties (RAAF Scenario 2 applies).
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.3 (Relative Density)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 109 (Density of Liquids and Solids)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of method:
pycnometer method
Key result
Type:
density
Density:
750 kg/m³
Temp.:
20.2 °C
Key result
Type:
relative density
Density:
0.75 other: Unitless
Temp.:
20.2 °C

Results

Results of duplicate determinations of density are shown in the following table:

Table 3.4

 

Measurement

Determination

1

2

Mass of pycnometer (g)

17.0620

17.5869

Mass of pycnometer and distilled water at 20.2ºC (g)

27.2282

27.7623

Mass of pycnometer and test item at 20.2ºC (g)

24.7022

25.2385

Density of water at 20.2ºC (kg/m3)

998.16

998.16

Density (kg/m3)

750.15

750.59

Relative density

0.75017

0.75061

 

Mean density:                        750 kg/m3
Temperature:                          20.2 ± 0.5ºC
Mean relative density             0.750

Conclusions:
Please see the Executive Summary for the Conclusion.
Executive summary:

The determination was carried out using the pycnometer method, designed to be compatible with Method A3 Relative Density of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and Method 109 of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, 02 October 2012.

Conclusion

The density of the test item has been determined to be 750 kg/m3 at 20.2 ± 0.5°C, relative density 0.75.

Endpoint:
relative density
Remarks:
density
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
Experimental Starting Date: 03 December 2013 Experimental Completion Date: 11 March 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
Justification for type of information:
The hypothesis for the analogue approach is that the test substance Hydrocarbons, C12-C15, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics contains constituents which are also constituents of the target substance, Hydrocarbons, C11-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics. The substances have overlapping constituents and therefore have qualitatively similar properties (RAAF Scenario 2 applies).
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.3 (Relative Density)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 109 (Density of Liquids and Solids)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of method:
pycnometer method
Key result
Type:
density
Density:
763 kg/m³
Temp.:
20 °C
Key result
Type:
relative density
Density:
0.76 other: Unitless
Temp.:
20 °C

Results

Results of duplicate determinations of density are shown in the following table:

Table 3.4

 

Measurement

Determination

1

2

Mass of pycnometer (g)

18.2213

17.3551

Mass of pycnometer and distilled water at 20.0ºC (g)

28.1399

27.5689

Mass of pycnometer and test item at 20.0ºC (g)

25.8009

25.1614

Density of water at 20.0ºC (kg/m3)

998.20

998.20

Density (kg/m3)

762.81

762.92

Relative density

0.76283

0.76294

 

Mean density:                        763 kg/m3
Temperature:                          20.0 ± 0.5 ºC
Mean relative density             0.763

Conclusions:
Please seethe Executive Summary for the Conclusion.
Executive summary:

The determination was carried out using the pycnometer method, designed to be compatible with Method A3 Relative Density of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and Method 109 of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, 02 October 2012.

  

Conclusion

The density of the test item has been determined to be 763 kg/m3 at 20.0 ± 0.5°C, relative density 0.763.

Endpoint:
relative density
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
Experimental Starting Date: 04 December 2013 Experimental Completion Date: 11 March 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
The hypothesis for the analogue approach is that the test substance Hydrocarbons, C14-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics contains constituents which are also constituents of the target substance, Hydrocarbons, C11-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics. The substances have overlapping constituents and therefore have qualitatively similar properties (RAAF Scenario 2 applies).
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.3 (Relative Density)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 109 (Density of Liquids and Solids)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of method:
pycnometer method
Key result
Type:
relative density
Density:
0.773 other: Unitless
Temp.:
20 °C
Key result
Type:
density
Density:
773 kg/m³
Temp.:
20 °C

Results

Results of duplicate determinations of density are shown in the following table:

Table 3.4

 

Measurement

Determination

1

2

Mass of pycnometer (g)

17.3540

18.2211

Mass of pycnometer and distilled water at 20.0ºC (g)

27.5683

28.1411

Mass of pycnometer and test item at 20.0ºC (g)

25.2609

25.8971

Density of water at 20.0ºC (kg/m3)

998.20

998.20

Density (kg/m3)

772.71

772.40

Relative density

0.77273

0.77242

 

Mean density:                        773 kg/m3
Temperature:                          20.0 ± 0.5ºC
Mean relative density             0.773

 

Conclusions:
Please see the Executive Summary for the Conclusion.
Executive summary:

The determination was carried out using the pycnometer method, designed to be compatible with Method A3 Relative Density of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and Method 109 of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, 02 October 2012.

Conclusion

The density of the test item has been determined to be 773 kg/m3 at 20.0 ± 0.5°C, relative density 0.773.

Description of key information

The relative density of Hydrocarbons, C11-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics at 20 ± 0.5°C is 0.7627.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

Only supporting data is available for Hydrocarbons, C11-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics. However, data is available for structural analogues,Hydrocarbons, C10-C13, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics;Hydrocarbons, C12-C15, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics; and Hydrocarbons, C14-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics and presented in the dossier. The hypothesis for the analogue approach is that the test substances, Hydrocarbons, C10-C13, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics; Hydrocarbons, C12-C15, n-alkanes, isoalkanes <2% aromatics; and Hydrocarbons, C14-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics contain constituents which are also constituents of the target substance, Hydrocarbons, C11-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics. The substances have overlapping constituents and therefore have qualitatively similar properties (RAAF Scenario 2 applies).

Hydrocarbons, C11-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics has a measured density value of 0.7663 g/cm3 at 15°C and 0.7627 g/cm3 at 20°C using an oscillating densitometer. Full study details are not available therefore reliability could not be assigned to these data.

Reliable data are, however, available for related substances in the relevant carbon number range, including other Fischer-Tropsch process-derived substances.

In OECD 109 studies using the pycnometer method, which were conducted in compliance with GLP, Hydrocarbons, C10-C13, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics (GS190), Hydrocarbons, C12-C15, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics (GS215) and Hydrocarbons, C14-C16, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, <2% aromatics (GS250) had measured relative density values of 0.75 at 20.2 ± 0.5°C (density = 750 kg/m3 at 20.2 ± 0.5°C), 0.763 at 20 ± 0.5°C (density = 763 kg/m3 at 20 ± 0.5°C) and 0.773 at 20 ± 0.5°C (density = 773 kg/m3 at 20 ± 0.5°C) respectively. The results are considered to be reliable and are used as weight of evidence.