Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14 August 2017 to 13 October 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
activation of keratinocytes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-[2-[4-[benzylmethyl(ethyl)amino]phenyl]vinyl]-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridinium acetate
EC Number:
281-468-5
EC Name:
4-[2-[4-[benzylmethyl(ethyl)amino]phenyl]vinyl]-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridinium acetate
Cas Number:
83950-14-5
Molecular formula:
C24H27N2O.C2H3O2
IUPAC Name:
4-[2-[4-[benzylmethyl(ethyl)amino]phenyl]vinyl]-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridinium acetate
Test material form:
liquid

In vitro test system

Details on the study design:
Skin sensitisation (In vitro test system) - transgenic cell line KeratinoSens™ (Givaudan, Switzerland)
Based on a stock solution (40 mg/L arbitrary set at 200 mM) a set of twelve master solutions in 100% DMSO was prepared by serial dilution using a constant dilution factor of 1:2. These master solutions were diluted 1:100 in cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium). The following concentration range was tested in the assay:
2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.63, 7.81, 3.91, 1.95, 0.98 µM
Cells were incubated with the test item for 48 h at 37 ± 1°C and 5% CO2. . After exposure cells were lysed and luciferase activity was assessed by luminescence measurement.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Cinnamic aldehyde (4 µM, 8 µM, 16 µM; 32 µM; 64 µM): Induction PC at 64 µM: 3.62 and 5.74 (within 2 times SD of historical control values)

In vitro / in chemico

Resultsopen allclose all
Run / experiment:
other: 1
Parameter:
other: IC 1.5
Value:
11.53
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
IC 1.5 15.89 uM
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Remarks:
cell viability at lowest concentration inducing > 1.5 fold increase 109.4%
Run / experiment:
other: 2
Parameter:
other: IC 1.5
Value:
9.56
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
IC 1.5 10.36 uM
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Remarks:
cell viability at lowest concentration inducing > 1.5 fold increase 105.9%

Any other information on results incl. tables

Induction of Luciferase Activity – Overall Induction

Overall Induction

Concentration [µM]

Fold Induction

Significance

Experiment 1

Experiment 2

Mean

SD

Solvent Control

-

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.00

 

Positive Control

4.00

1.19

1.18

1.18

0.01

 

8.00

1.37

1.38

1.37

0.00

 

16.00

1.50

1.79

1.65

0.21

*

32.00

2.11

2.54

2.33

0.31

*

64.00

3.62

5.74

4.68

1.50

*

Test Item

0.98

1.06

1.14

1.10

0.06

 

1.95

0.98

1.01

1.00

0.02

 

3.91

0.87

0.89

0.88

0.02

 

7.81

0.95

1.21

1.08

0.18

 

15.63

2.11

2.52

2.31

0.29

*

31.25

4.82

5.83

5.33

0.72

*

62.50

9.65

11.09

10.37

1.02

*

125.00

16.82

10.18

13.50

4.70

 

250.00

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.00

 

500.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

 

1000.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

 

2000.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

 

* = significant induction according to Student’s t-test, p<0.05

Acceptance Criteria

Criterion

Range

Experiment 1

pass/fail

Experiment 2

pass/fail

CV Solvent Control

< 20%

6.4

pass

8.2

pass

No. of positive control concentration steps with significant luciferase activity induction >1.5

≥ 1

3.0

pass

3.0

pass

EC1.5 PC

7 < x < 34 µM

15.89

pass

10.36

pass

Induction PC at 64 µM

2.00 < x < 8.00

3.62

pass

5.74

pass

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Based on the in vitro KeratinoSens™ assay the substance is considered sensitizing to the skin.
Executive summary:

In an in vitro KeratinoSens™ assay the sensitising potential of the substance by addressing the second molecular key event of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for skin sensitization, namely activation of keratinocytes, cells were incubated with the test item for 48 h at 37°C. After exposure cells were lysed and luciferase activity was assessed by luminescence measurement.

In the first experiment, a max luciferase activity (Imax) induction of 16.82 was determined at a substance concentration of 125 µM. The corresponding cell viability was 6.6%. The lowest tested concentration with a significant luciferase induction >1.5 (2.11) was found to be 15.63 µM. The corresponding cell viability was >70% (109.4%).The calculated EC1.5 was < 1000 µM (11.53 µM).

In the second experiment, a max luciferase activity (Imax) induction of 11.09 was determined at a substance concentration of 62.5 µM. The corresponding cell viability was 45.8%. The lowest tested concentration with a significant luciferase induction >1.5 (2.52) was found to be 15.63 µM. The corresponding cell viability was >70% (105.9%).The calculated EC1.5 was < 1000 µM (9.56 µM).

A dose response for luciferase activity induction was observed for each individual run as well as for an overall luciferase activity induction.

The result is an indication for skin sensitizing properties of the substance. However, as this involves only the second key event in the AOP for skin sensitization, no definitive conclusion can be drawn.