Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Vapour pressure

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
06.02.2018
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
1. SOFTWARE
EPI suite Version 4.11

2. MODEL (incl. version number)
MPBPVP v1.43

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
(C(C(O)C(O)C1O)CO)C1OC(OC(C(O)C2O)CO)C2O


4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
Documentation of the methods (including literature references) is available within the software tool.

5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
Currently there is no universally accepted definition of model domain.  However, users may wish to consider the possibility that property estimates are less accurate for compounds outside the Molecular Weight range of the training set compounds, and/or that have more instances of a given fragment than the maximum for all training set compounds.  It is also possible that a compound may have a functional group(s) or other structural features not represented in the training set, and for which no fragment coefficient was developed.  These points should be taken into consideration when interpreting model results.
The complete training sets for MPBPWIN's estimation methodology are not available.  Therefore, describing a precise estimation domain for this methodology is not possible.
The current applicability of the MPBPWIN methodology is best described by its accuracy in predicting vapor pressure as described above in the Accuracy section.

6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
The prediction is done for the endpoint in question. Therefore the results are treated as adequate.
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
QSAR calculation using well established software tool
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
only in silico calculation:
Key result
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
< 0.001 Pa

calculated value for Vapour pressure:

VP(mm Hg,25 deg C): 2.19E-016 (Modified Grain method)

VP (Pa, 25 deg C) : 2.92E-014 (Modified Grain method)

Conclusions:
The vapour pressure of Trehalose is calculated to be
VP(mm Hg,25 deg C): 2.19E-016 (Modified Grain method)
VP (Pa, 25 deg C) : 2.92E-014 (Modified Grain method).
For risk assessment, the specification < 0.001 Pa is used.

Description of key information

Vapour pressure is calculated using the software tool Epiwin 4.11.

The key value for chemical safety assessment is derived based on the calculated value

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Vapour pressure:
0.001 Pa
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information