Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
This study was conducted between15 February 2017 and 08 March 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Reliability 1 is assigned because the study conducted according to OECD TG 420 in compliance with GLP, without deviations that influence the quality of the results.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
Version / remarks:
2001
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 bis (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure)
Version / remarks:
EC NO. 440/2008
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
fixed dose procedure

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
EC Number:
292-588-2
EC Name:
Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
Cas Number:
90640-67-8
Molecular formula:
C6H18N4, C8H20N4, C8H20N4, C6H18N4
IUPAC Name:
Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
reaction product of Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction and 2,3-epoxypropyl o-tolyl ether
IUPAC Name:
reaction product of Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction and 2,3-epoxypropyl o-tolyl ether
Constituent 3
Reference substance name:
TOFA-TETA adducts
IUPAC Name:
TOFA-TETA adducts
Constituent 4
Reference substance name:
TOFA-TETA-CGE adducts
IUPAC Name:
TOFA-TETA-CGE adducts
Constituent 5
Reference substance name:
TOFA-TETA-TOFA
IUPAC Name:
TOFA-TETA-TOFA
Constituent 6
Reference substance name:
Higher molecular weight oligomeric adducts
IUPAC Name:
Higher molecular weight oligomeric adducts
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification: Tall-oil fatty acids oligomeric reaction products with triethylenetetramine and glycidyl tolyl ether
Batch: Ei 4015
Purity: 100% (UVCB)
Physical state/Appearance: dark yellow viscous liquid
Expiry Date: 15 November 2021
Storage Conditions: room temperature in the dark

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Remarks:
RccHan™:WIST
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Animal Information
Female Wistar (RccHan™:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The females were nulliparous and non pregnant. After an acclimatization period of at least 5 days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals were 8 to 12 weeks of age. The body weight variation did not exceed ±20% of the mean body weight at the start of treatment.

Animal Care and Husbandry
The animals were housed in groups of up to four in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately 3 to 4 hours after dosing, free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analyzed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that would reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25 °C and 30 to 70% respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give 12 hours continuous light and 12 hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
Test Item Preparation
For the purpose of the study the test item was used as supplied. The specific gravity was determined and used to calculate the appropriate dose volume for the required dose level.

Dose Level (mg/kg) Specific Gravity Dose Volume (mL/kg)
2000 0.999 2.01

All animals were dosed once only by gavage, using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe. The volume administered to each animal was calculated according to the fasted body weight at the time of dosing
Doses:
2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
Study Design
Using available information on the toxicity of the test item, 2000 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose.
A single animal was treated as follows:
Dose Level (mg/kg) Dose Volume (mL/kg) Number of Female Rats
2000 2.01 1

In the absence of toxicity at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg, an additional group of animals was treated as follows:
Dose Level (mg/kg) Dose Volume (mL/kg) Number of Female Rats
2000 2.01 4

A total of five animals were therefore treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg in the study.
All animals were dosed once only by gavage, using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe. The volume administered to each animal was calculated according to the fasted body weight at the time of dosing. Treatment of animals was sequential. Sufficient time was allowed between each dose group to confirm the survival of the previously dosed animals.
Clinical observations were made 30 minutes, 1, 2, and 4 hours after dosing and then daily for 14 days. Morbidity and mortality checks were made twice daily, early and late during normal working days, and once daily at weekends and public holidays.
Individual body weights were recorded on Day 0 (the day of dosing) and on Days 7 and 14.
At the end of the observation period the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.

Data Evaluation
The test item was classified according to Annex 3 of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 420 "Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method" (adopted 17 December 2001).
Evaluation of data included identification of the number of animals that died during the study (or that were killed for humane reasons), and determination of the nature, severity, onset and duration of the toxic effects. If possible, the signs of evident toxicity were described. Evident toxicity refers to the toxic effects of sufficient severity that administration of the next higher dose level could result in development of severe signs of toxicity and probable mortality. Effects on body weights and abnormalities noted at necropsy were also identified.
Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item was made.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: Globally Harmonized Classification System - Category 5
Mortality:
There were no deaths
Clinical signs:
other: Red/brown staining around the snout was noted 1 and 2 days after dosing in the initial treated animal. No signs of systemic toxicity were noted in the four additional treated animals during the observation period.
Gross pathology:
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Other findings:
No other findings noted

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 5 based on GHS criteria
Remarks:
Globally Harmonized Classification System
Conclusions:
The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight
Executive summary:

The study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test item in the Wistar strain rat according to the following guidelines

•       OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No 420 “Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method” (2001)

•       Method B1 bis Acute Toxicity (Oral) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008

Methods

Following a sighting test at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg, an additional four fasted female animals were given a single oral dose of test item at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight.  Clinical signs and body weight development were monitored during the study.  All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.

Results

Mortality.  There were no deaths.

Clinical Observations.  Red/brown staining around the snout was noted 1 and 2 days after dosing in the initial treated animal.  There were no other signs of systemic toxicity.

Body Weight.  All animals showed expected gains in body weight.

Necropsy.  No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Conclusion

The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight (Globally Harmonized Classification System - Category 5).