Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Centella asiatica dry ext. is of low acute oral and dermal toxicity. The experimental LD50 are > 2000 mg/kg bw for both routes of exposure.

Inhalation toxicity is not expected, since no exposure is foreseen for Centella asiatica dry ext.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2013
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Doses:
2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3 female for step.
Two step.
Total 6 female
Control animals:
no
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50 cut-off
Effect level:
2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
no
Clinical signs:
no
Gross pathology:
no
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
CENTELLA 36CT60090 is not classified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Data waiving:
exposure considerations
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation is not likely taking into account the vapour pressure of the substance and/or the possibility of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Version / remarks:
2017
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
fixed dose procedure
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Species/strain: WISTAR rats Crl: WI(Han)
Source: Charles River, 97633 Sulzfeld, Germany
Sex: female (non-pregnant and nulliparous)
Number of animals: 3 animals
Body weight at the
beginning of the study: 215 – 226 g
Age at the
beginning of the study: 12 - 14 weeks
The animals were derived from a controlled full-barrier maintained breeding system (SPF). According to the German Act on Animal Welfare the animals were bred for experimental purposes.
This study was performed in an AAALAC-accredited laboratory. According to German animal protection law, the study type has been reviewed and accepted by local authorities. Furthermore, the study has been subjected to Ethical Review Process and was authorised by the Bavarian animal welfare administration.
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
sterile water
Duration of exposure:
24h
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
1female + 2 female
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
Procedure Dose Range Finding Test
One animal was dosed at a dosage of 2000mg/kg body weight. As the animal survived without showing any signs of systemic toxicity, this dose was used as a starting dose for the main study.

Procedure Main Test
The dose was administered to two animals sequentially. As both animals survived at 2000 mg/kg body weight without showing any signs of systemic toxicity, no further dose was tested.

Exposure Period
The test item was held in contact with the skin throughout a 24-hour period. At the end of the exposure period the residual test item was removed using aqua ad injectionem (sterile water).

Observation Period
All animals were observed for 14 days after dosing.

Primary Skin Irritation
Signs of erythema and oedema were assessed using the scoring system laid down in OECD Guideline 404, 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
other: ATE
Remarks:
2000mg/kg bw
Effect level:
>= 2 000 - <= 5 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin irritation up to the relevant limit dose level
Mortality:
0
Clinical signs:
0
Body weight:
unchanged
Gross pathology:
0

 Table: Absolute Body Weights [g] and Body Weight Change [%] - DRF and Main Study

Dose: 2000 mg/kg body weight

Animal No. / Sex

Absolute Body Weights [g]

Body Weight Change [%]

Day 1

Day 8

Day 15

Day 1-15

1 / female

215

218

215

0

2 / female

222

220

233

5

3 / female

226

227

233

3

bw = body weight

Pathology

No specific gross pathological changes were recorded for any animal (for individual data seeTable9).

Table:  Macroscopic Findings - Individual Data – DRF and Main Study

Dose: 2000 mg/kg bw

Animal No. / Sex

Organ

Macroscopic Findings

1 / female

-

nsf

2 / female

-

nsf

3 / female

-

nsf

nsf = no specific findings

 Acute Toxicity Estimate (ATE)

Table: Acute Toxicity Estimate (ATE) according to GHS, 2017[9]

Dose
(mg/kg bw)

Number of Animals Investigated
(Main Study)

Number of Intercurrent Deaths

Category

ATE
(mg/kg bw)

2000 mg/kg bw

3 females

0

5

2000 < ATE≤5000

bw = body weight

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the present study, single dermal application of the test item Centella asiatica dry ext. to rats at a dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight was associated with no mortality and neither signs of toxicity nor signs of irritation.
According to OECD guideline 402 the test item Centella asiatica dry ext. has no obligatory labelling requirement for percutaneous toxicity and is unclassified.
The Acute Toxicity Estimate according to GHS (Globally Harmonized Classification System), 2017 was determined to be 2000 < ATE ≤ 5000 mg Centella asiatica dry ext. / kg body weight.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to the experimental results, no classification is deemed necessary regarding acute toxicity endpoints.