Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Biotransformation and kinetics

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
biotransformation and kinetics
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well documented study according to a sound study design similar (but not identical) to the OECD protocol for biotransformation using rainbow trout liver S9 fraction and hepatocytes that is currently undergoing validation.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline for biotransformation using rainbow trout liver S9 fraction and hepatocytes (Guideline currently under validation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
A single tube (in replicates) was used for the incubations procedure as opposed to several test tubes representing each time point.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of medium:
animal

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,4,6-tris(1-phenylethyl)phenol
EC Number:
242-128-1
EC Name:
2,4,6-tris(1-phenylethyl)phenol
Cas Number:
18254-13-2
Molecular formula:
C30H30O
IUPAC Name:
2,4,6-tris(1-phenylethyl)phenol
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Details on test material:
The test material is one of the main constituents of the reaction mass of 2,4,6-tris(1-phenylethyl)phenol and Bis(1-phenylethyl) phenol.

Results and discussion

Transformation products:
no

Any other information on results incl. tables

The hepatocyte assay was conducted with the biological activity being stopped using a 1:1 ACN:THF dilution. Tables 1 - 3 detail the biotransformation of TSP after 180 min incubation with rainbow trout hepatocytes in the three separate experiments.

In Experiment One, loss of TSP was observed in the reaction mix, as well as in all of the controls (e.g. solvent deactivated and fluroxypyr positive control). It was later identified that the source of the GC-MS was not workin properly and therefore, any observed loss was due to the malfunction of the GC-MS instrument itself.

 

There was also a concern that the solvent deactivation procedure was not stringent enough and therefore caused false positive responses in the controls. It was then decided thatthe hepatocytes would be heat deactivated (boiling hepatocytes at 100 °C for at least 1 min) as opposed tobeing deactivated using solvent as it was performed in Experiment One. Based on these two factors, twoadditional experiments were conducted with TSP and hepatocytes.

In Experiments Two and Three, no loss of TSP was observed in the heat deactivated negative controlsindicating that enzymes were successfully denatured. In addition, loss of the positive control, fluroxypyr,was observed. over the course of both experiments indicating that the hepatocytes were metabolically active. No loss of TSP was observed in the reaction mixes from Experiment Two and Three.

In conclusion there was no significant loss of parent TSP over time demonstrating that there was noenzymatic metabolism

It should be noted that higher levels of TSP and fluroxypyr were detected in the S9 study, as opposed to this study, even though both studies utilized the same concentration. While a definitive reason cannot begiven, it is likely due to differences in binding within the cell suspension and ultimate bioavailability. Itis likely that these compounds had a greater affinity for the hepatocytes compared to the S9 suspension, thus lowering the overall bioavailable free measurable fraction. The fluoroxypyr concentrations detected in both experiments are within the range typically detected from our laboratory.

Further, the absolute Time 0 initial concentrations are different between concentrations. The Time 0samples were taken immediately after the addition of the last reagent. Recent discussions with thistechnique suggest that this does not represent a true Time 0 as biotransformation may begin immediately. Therefore, the reported Time 0 is a relative value. Given that the bioavailability of TSP appears to be different with S9 cells and cell suspensions, the bioavailability in the reaction mix likely attributed to differences in starting concentrations.

Table 1: Experiment One

 

 

TSP Reaction Mix

Solvent

Deactivated Control

 

Fluroxypyr

Positive Control

Fluroxypyr Deactivated Control

Run

Time point

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

Time point

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

1

0 min

3.57

1

0 min

41.64

52.84

2

0 min

1.62

0.12

0 min

47.87

36.63

3

0 min

1.83

0.44

0 min

48.55

38.37

Avg.

0 min

2.34

0.52

0 min

46.02

42.61

1

30 min

2.16

0.77

5 min

38.84

8.25

2

30 min

1.32

0.69

5 min

35.81

36.63

3

30 min

1.5

0.67

5 min

39.05

38.37

Avg.

30 min

1.66

0.71

5 min

37.9

16.08

1

60 min

0.27

0.44

10 min

28.94

14.59

2

60 min

0.25

0.08

10 min

13.23

26.6

3

60 min

0.52

0.19

10 min

13.14

24.13

Avg.

60 min

0.35

0.24

10 min

18.44

21.77

1

120 min

0.61

0.08

20 min

2.49

7.94

2

120 min

0.16

0.27

20 min

10.89

4.68

3

120 min

nd

nd

20 min

11.63

16.49

Avg.

120 min

0.39

0.18

20 min

8.34

9.70

1

180 min

0.42

nd

30 min

4.06

15.76

2

180 min

0.79

0.18

30 min

1.41

13.74

3

180 min

nd

0.12

30 min

nd

9.04

Avg.

180 min

0.61

0.15

30 min

2.74

12.85

Table 2: Experiment Two

 

 

TSP Reaction Mix

Solvent

Deactivated Control

 

Fluroxypyr

Positive Control

Fluroxypyr Deactivated Control

Run

Time point

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

Time point

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

1

0 min

3.84

1.07

0 min

3.85

3.58

2

0 min

2.68

1.38

0 min

2.98

2.98

3

0 min

2.98

1.24

0 min

3.68

2.79

Avg.

0 min

3.17

1.23

0 min

3.50

3.45

1

30 min

3.86

1.22

5 min

3.12

3.48

2

30 min

3.11

nd

5 min

2.45

4.62

3

30 min

2.89

1.02

5 min

2.98

3.37

Avg.

30 min

3.29

1.12

5 min

2.85

3.82

1

60 min

3.44

1.02

10 min

1.45

5.01

2

60 min

3.48

nd

10 min

1.99

3.45

3

60 min

3.74

1.17

10 min

1.32

4.12

Avg.

60 min

3.55

1.09

10 min

1.59

4.19

1

120 min

3.95

1.97

20 min

0.95

3.97

2

120 min

3.61

nd

20 min

0.78

4.82

3

120 min

3.51

1.99

20 min

nd

3.12

Avg.

120 min

3.69

1.98

20 min

0.87

3.97

1

180 min

3.46

1.46

30 min

0.01

4.63

2

180 min

3.69

nd

30 min

0.15

4.12

3

180 min

2.87

1.64

30 min

nd

3.46

Avg.

180 min

3.34

1.55

30 min

0.08

4.07

Table 3: Experiment Three

 

 

TSP Reaction Mix

Solvent

Deactivated Control

 

Fluroxypyr

Positive Control

Fluroxypyr Deactivated Control

Run

Time point

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

Time point

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

TSP Conc.

(ppm)

1

0 min

2.23

5.21

0 min

2.13

4.12

2

0 min

3.21

4.28

0 min

2.58

4.78

3

0 min

2.79

5.01

0 min

2.93

3.87

Avg.

0 min

2.74

4.83

0 min

2.55

4.26

1

30 min

3.05

4.749

5 min

1.78

3.98

2

30 min

2.87

5.12

5 min

2.19

4.12

3

30 min

2.01

4.31

5 min

2.01

4.45

Avg.

30 min

2.64

4.74

5 min

1.99

4.18

1

60 min

2.21

6.23

10 min

0.98

5.12

2

60 min

2.12

4.29

10 min

1.12

3.78

3

60 min

2.03

4.82

10 min

0.84

4.29

Avg.

60 min

2.12

5.11

10 min

0.98

4.40

1

120 min

2.35

5.19

20 min

0.12

4.59

2

120 min

3.01

4.76

20 min

0.24

5.81

3

120 min

2.08

4.92

20 min

0.08

4.19

Avg.

120 min

2.48

4.96

20 min

0.15

4.86

1

180 min

2.13

4.18

30 min

0.01

5.08

2

180 min

3.02

5.64

30 min

nd

4.76

3

180 min

2.52

4.58

30 min

nd

4.38

Avg.

180 min

2.56

4.8

30 min

0.01

4.74


Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
There was no significant loss of parent material over time due to the active biotransformation of TSP in hepatocytes from rainbow trout.
Executive summary:

Three separate experiments were conducted where 5µM of TSP was incubated with rainbow trout hepatocytes for 180 min. In the first experiment, a loss of TSP was observed in the reaction mix and allnegative controls. It was found that the GC-MS was compromised andthe results were not reliable. Twoadditional experimentswereconductedutilizing a different GC-MS instrument. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc testing showed no significant loss of TSP relative to time 0 minutes for two independent hepatocyte assays (p ≥ 0.05). TSP showed no loss in the Heat Deactivated or No NADPH controls in the hepatocyte assay.

In conclusion, there was no significant loss of parent material over time due to the active biotransformation of TSP in hepatocytes from rainbow trout.