Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1981
Report date:
1981
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1965
Report date:
1965

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
nine induction exposures
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The test was done before LLNA as first-choice method for in-vivo testing was set into force.

Test material

1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Nonanoic acid
EC Number:
203-931-2
EC Name:
Nonanoic acid
Cas Number:
112-05-0
Molecular formula:
C9H18O2
IUPAC Name:
nonanoic acid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: males 302 to 396 g; females 303 to 367 g
- Housing: singly in suspended stainless steel cages
- Diet: Charles River Vitamin-C fortified Guinea pig diet, ad libitum
- Water: automatic watering system, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 16 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°F): 65-75
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Vehicle:
other: 80% ethanol and acetone
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Concentration / amount:
100% (induction 1-5), 75% (induction 6-9)
Day(s)/duration:
3 exposures per week for a total of 3 weeks
Challengeopen allclose all
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: acetone
Concentration / amount:
Challenge: 10%
No.:
#2
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: acetone
Concentration / amount:
Re-challenge: 25%
Day(s)/duration:
one week after first challenge
No. of animals per dose:
20 (10 male, 10 females) in the definitive experiment received the test substance
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- No. of animals: 16
- Vehicle: acetone
- Concentrations: 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, and 100%
- Application of test material: each animal was dosed with two to four different concentrations, at different sites of the clipped dorsal skin.
- Application of test material: 0.2 mL of test material mixture was applied beneath a surgical gauze square, placed directly to the test site. The gauze was covered with plastic sheeting and held in place with an elastic adhesive bandage.
- Evaluation of skin reactions: observation for signs of skin irritation were made approx. 24 and 48 hours after dosing. Evaluation was made according to OECD TG 406, paragraph 23.


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 9 exposures in total; 3 exposures per week
- Exposure period: 3 weeks
- Test groups: 20 animals (10 m, 10 f)

- Control group:
-- Positive control; DCNB; 12 animals (6 m, 6 f)
-- Irritation control (challenge only): nonanoic acid 8 animals; DCNB 8 animals (4m, 4f each)

- Site: dorsal skin, right side of the midline
- Frequency of applications: 3 exposures per week
- Duration: 6 hours each
- Concentrations:
-- nonanoic acid: 100% inductions 1-5; 75% from the 6th induction onwards, due to severe skin irritation
-- DCNB: 0.5 and 0.75% during inductions 1 through 8; ninth induction was omitted due to severe skin irritation


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Day(s) of challenge: 1
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: as described above
- Control group: as described above
- Site: dorsal skin, sites left of the midline

- Concentrations:
-- nonanoic acid: 10% (challenge); 25% (re-challenge, 7 days after first challenge)
-- DCNB: 0.1% at challenge and at re-challenge

- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 after challenge dosing (and after re-challenge dosing)


OTHER: Re-challenge was made 7 days after the challenge treatment
Challenge controls:
yes
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
2,4-dinitrochlorbenzene

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
induction: 100% and 75%, challenge: 10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
induction: 100% and 75%, challenge: 10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
other: test group, re-challenge
Dose level:
induction: 100% and 75%, rechallenge: 25%
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
barely perceptible erythema
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
other: test group, re-challenge
Dose level:
induction: 100% and 75%, rechallenge: 25%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
barely perceptible erythema
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
induction: 0.5 and 0.75%, challenge: 0.1%
No. with + reactions:
10
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
induction: 0.5 and 0.75%; challenge: 0.1%
No. with + reactions:
10
Total no. in group:
20

Any other information on results incl. tables

Nonanoic acid:

0/20 test animals challenged with 10% test substance exhibited any dermal response, 3/20 showed barely perceptible erythema (+/-) after challenge with 25% test substance at 24 h, and 1/20 at 48 h. No irritation responses were noted in the corresponding controls with the 10% and 25% solutions. Scores of +/- are considered equivocal.


Positive control, DCNB
:
9/12 animals challenged with the positive control, 0.1% 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene, had a score of 1 and greater. No responses for the irritation controls for this treatment were observed.
This means 9/12 animals showed positive results (because of a dermal score of 1 or greater, in the absence of a dermal response in irritation control animals).

 

Materials

h

Erythema evaluation scores

Total No. of animals

 

 

0

+/-

1

2

3

 

DCNB, 0.1%

24

2

1

3

6

0

12

 

48

2

2

4

4

0

 

Irritation control

24

8

0

0

0

0

8

 

48

8

0

0

0

0

 

 

nonanoic acid, 10%

24

20

0

0

0

0

20

 

48

20

0

0

0

0

 

Re-challenge, 25%

24

17

3

0

0

0

20

 

48

19

1

0

0

0

 

Irritation control

24

8

0

0

0

0

8

 

48

8

0

0

0

0

 

Re-challenge irritation control

24

7

1

0

0

0

7

 

48

7

1

0

0

0

 

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified