Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-303-0 | CAS number: 119-17-5
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well performed GLP study according to OECD TG.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
- Report date:
- 2007
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- m-(4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulphonic acid
- EC Number:
- 204-303-0
- EC Name:
- m-(4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulphonic acid
- Cas Number:
- 119-17-5
- Molecular formula:
- C10H10N2O4S
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-(3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)benzene-1-sulfonic acid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Pyrazolic acid 3 TF
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- - Test system: Mice, CBA/CaOlaHsd
- Rationale: Recognised as the recommended test system
- Source: Harlan Netherlands
- Age: 7 - 8 weeks (beginning of acclimatisation)
- Identification: Single caging. The animals were distributed into the test groups at random and identified by cage number.
- Acclimatisation: Under test conditions after health examination. Only animals without any visible signs of illness were used for the study.
- Housing: single
- Cage Type: Makrolon Type I, with wire mesh top
- Bedding: granulated soft wood bedding
- Feed: pelleted standard diet, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum,
- Temperature: 22 +/- 3°C
- Relative humidity: 30-78%
- Artificial light: 6.00 a.m. - 6.00 p.m.
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- other: ethanol : deionised water (70:30)
- Concentration:
- Group 1: Control (Vecicle)
Group 2: 6.25%
Group 3: 12.5%
Group 4: 25% - No. of animals per dose:
- 4
- Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
- Statistics:
- The mean values and standard deviations were calculated for body weights.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- EC3 = 6.7% (w/v)
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks on result:
- other: Group 1 (Control): - Group 2 (6.25%): 1.15 Group 3 (12.5%): 0.77 Group 4 (25%): 0.76
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- DPM per lymph node: Group 1 (Control): 406.1 Group 2 (6.25%): 466.4 Group 3 (12.5%): 311.3 Group 4 (25%): 307.5 Since the lymph nodes of the animals of a dose group were pooled, DPM/node was determined by dividing the measured value by the number of lymph nodes pooled
Any other information on results incl. tables
The EC3 value could not be calculated, since all SI's are below 3.
Viability / Mortality
No deaths occurred during the study period.
Clinical Signs
No symptoms of local toxicity at the ears of the animals and no systemic findings were observed during the study period.
Body Weights
The body weight of the animals, recorded prior to the first application and prior to treatment with3HTdR, was within the range commonly recorded for animals of this strain and age.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
- Conclusions:
- The test item Pyracolic acid 3 TF was found to be not a skin sensitiser under the described conditions.
- Executive summary:
In this study the test item Pyrazolic acid 3 TF suspended in ethanol:deionised water (70+30) was assessed for its possible contact allergenic potential.
For this purpose a local lymph node assay was performed according to OECD guideline 429 using test item concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, and 25%.
The animals did not show any clinical signs during the course of the study and no cases of mortality were observed.
In this study Stimulation Indices (S.I.) of 1.15, 0.77, and 0.76 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, and 25% in ethanol:deionised water (70:30), respectively.
The test item Pyrazolic acid 3 TF was found not to be a skin sensitiser in this assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
