Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

In a key bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test) conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP, 3 -(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile was concluded to be negative with and without activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and in Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA (BioReliance, 2004a)

In a key mammalian cytogenicity study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP, 3 -(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile was concluded to be negative with and without activation in Chinese hamster ovary cells (OECD TG 473) (BioReliance, 2004b)

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2003-10-21 to 2003-12-02
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
1998
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
See table 1
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO

- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Sponsors request and compatability with target cells
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Remarks:
All strains (with activation)
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
Remarks:
TA 98 (without activation)
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
TA 100, TA 1535 (without activation)
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
TA 1537 (without activation)
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
WP2uvrA (without activation)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation

DURATION

- Preincubation period: 60 minutes

- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 to 72 hours

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates for each test concentration

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth; background lawn
Evaluation criteria:
For the test article to be evaluated positive, it must cause a dose-related increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one tester strain over a minimum of two increasing concentrations. For TA1535 and TA1537 there must be a 3 fold increase. For TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA, there must be a 2 fold increase.
Statistics:
Mean and Standard deviation of the number of revertants per plate were calculated and reported.
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
TA 1535 (-MA) 3333 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Results were within range of historical control data

 

Table 2 : Experiment 1 Preliminary toxicity assay Number of revertants per plate

 Strain

TA98

TA100

TA1535

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

12

18

No

136

186

No

15

12

No

6.7

13

18

No

117

138

No

13

11

No

10

14

16

No

134

126

No

10

9

No

33

13

13

No

121

105

No

12

12

No

67

11

13

No

107

128

No

8

10

No

100

12

15

No

124

112

No

11

13

No

333

15

17

No

114

101

No

13

14

No

667

11

11

No

115

109

No

13

9

No

1000

10

15

No

122

121

No

14

10

No

3333

10

17

No

119

168

No

9

10

No

5000

16

19

No

134

117

No

6

11

Yes

*solvent control with DMSO

 

Table 3 : Experiment 1 Preliminary toxicity assay Number of revertants per plate

 Strain

TA1537

WP2uvrA

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

7

6

No

10

12

No

6.7

6

5

No

13

11

No

10

10

3

No

14

10

No

33

6

8

No

11

14

No

67

5

6

No

12

10

No

100

7

8

No

10

11

No

333

8

3

No

14

12

No

667

4

4

No

13

13

No

1000

6

7

No

10

8

No

3333

6

5

No

10

13

No

5000

4

5

No

12

15

No

*solvent control with DMSO

 

Table 4: Experiment 2 Plate incorporation assay, Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 Strain

TA98

TA100

TA1535

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

17

22

No

184

196

No

8

11

No

100

13

21

No

147

226

No

10

10

No

333

18

18

No

193

206

No

10

12

No

1000

19

23

No

158

196

No

9

10

No

3333

24

21

No

172

179

No

7

8

No

5000

16

25

No

186

208

No

9

6

No

Positive control

157

873

No

645

1002

No

194

264

No

*solvent control with DMSO

 

Table 5: Experiment 2 Plate incorporation assay, Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 Strain

TA1537

WP2uvrA

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

8

6

No

11

11

No

100

9

8

No

12

11

No

333

9

4

No

12

11

No

1000

8

5

No

13

12

No

3333

6

6

No

13

12

No

5000

8

6

No

12

12

No

Positive control

400

72

No

230

82

No

*solvent control with DMSO

 

Table 6: Experiment 3 Preincubation assay, Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 Starin

TA98

TA100

TA1535

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

14

18

No

152

180

No

21

12

No

100

13

21

No

157

242

No

15

11

No

333

14

15

No

165

180

No

21

10

No

1000

15

18

No

170

208

No

11

11

No

3333

10

14

No

166

190

No

11**

12

Yes

5000

9

12

No

168

208

No

8**

11

Yes

Positive control

394

904

No

486

1105

No

270

70

No

*solvent control with DMSO

**Moderate reduction in background lawn

 

Table 7: Experiment 3 Preincubation assay, Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 Starin

TA1537

WP2uvrA

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

— MA

+ MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

4

4

No

11

12

No

100

5

5

No

11

10

No

333

5

4

No

14

9

No

1000

4

5

No

12

13

No

3333

3

6

No

11

8

No

5000

2

4

Yes

12

8

No

Positive control

220

126

No

205

614

No

*solvent control with DMSO

 

Conclusions:
In a reliable and valid study, conducted in accordance with OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP, 3-(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile did not induce mutagenic activity in Salmonella and E.coli strains. The test substance was concluded to be negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2003-10-16 to 2003-12-05
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
The study was conducted according to the appropriate OECD test guideline, and in compliance with GLP.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Version / remarks:
1998
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Species / strain / cell type:
other: Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
See table 1
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO

- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: based on information provided by sponsor and compatibility with target cells
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Remarks:
(without activation)
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
(with activation)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION

- Exposure duration: 4 hours (+/- MA); 20 hours (+ MA)

- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 4 hours (+/- MA); 16 hours (+ MA)

- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 4 hours (+/- MA); 20 hours (+ MA)

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 plates for each test concentration

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per test concentration

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY

- Method: relative total growth
Evaluation criteria:
Toxic effects based on cell growth inhibition and mitotic index relative to solvent control. Number and type of aberrations found recorded. The test substance was considered to induce a positive response when the % of cells with aberrations is increased in a dose-responsive manner with one or more concentrations being statistically significant (p=0.05).
Statistics:
Cell counts and % viability used to determine cell growth inhibition relative to the solvent control. A minimum of 200 mataphase spreads (100 per duplicate flask) were examined and scored for chromatid-type and chromosome-type aberrations. Statistical analysis of % aberrant cells performed using the Fischer's exact test. In the event of a positive Fischer's exact test at any test substance dose level, the Cochran-Armitage test was used to measure dose-responsiveness.
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: > 2172 ug/mL
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Results were within range of historical control data

Table 2:

Results of chromosome analysis Experiment 1, 4h treatment without activation (total count from 2 cultures)

 

Solvent*

Control***

Positive

Control**

543 µg/ml

1086 µg/ml

2172 µg/ml

Cytotoxicity

no

no

no

no

no

 

Mean

Chromatid aberrations

gaps

0

0

0

0

0

breaks

1

19

1

1

1

exchanges

0

4

0

0

1

Chromosome aberrations

breaks

0

0

0

0

0

Dic

1

1

1

0

4

Ring

0

0

0

0

0

Mitotic index

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Polyploidy

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Endo reduplication

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

 *Solvent control with DMSO

** Per 50 cells

*** Per 100 cells

NR not reported

 

Table 3: Results of chromosome analysis Experiment 1, 4h treatment with activation (total count from 2 cultures)

 

Solvent*

Control***

Positive

Control**

543 µg/ml

1086 µg/ml

2172 µg/ml

Cytotoxicity

no

no

no

no

no

 

Mean

Chromatid aberrations

gaps

0

0

0

0

0

breaks

0

4

0

1

1

exchanges

0

20

0

0

1

Chromosome aberrations

breaks

0

2

0

0

0

Dic

0

0

0

0

0

Ring

0

0

0

0

0

Mitotic index

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Polyploidy

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Endo reduplication

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

 *Solvent control with DMSO

** Per 50 cells

*** Per 100 cells

NR not reported

 

Table 4: Results of chromosome analysis Experiment 1, 20h treatment without activation (total count from 2 cultures)

 

Solvent*

Control***

Positive

Control**

543 µg/ml

1086 µg/ml

2172 µg/ml

Cytotoxicity

no

no

no

no

no

 

Mean

Chromatidaberrations

gaps

0

0

0

0

0

breaks

0

4

0

0

3

exchanges

0

10

0

0

1

Chromosome aberrations

breaks

0

3

0

0

1

Dic

0

1

0

0

2

Ring

0

0

1

0

2

Mitotic index

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Polyploidy

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Endo reduplication

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

 *Solvent control with DMSO

** Per 50 cells

*** Per 100 cells

NR not reported

 

Conclusions:
In a reliable and valid study conducted in accordance with OECD Test Guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP, 3-(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile was concluded to be negative for the induction of structural and numerical chromosome aberrations in CHO cells in both the activated and non- activated test systems.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Data are available from reliable in vitro studies on mutagenicity to bacterial cells and on cytogenicity to mammalian cells.

3-(Triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria in a key study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP (BioReliance, 2004a).

No evidence of a substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without activation in TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA in the initial and confirmatory assays, using the plate incorporation and preincubation methods, respectively. No toxicity to bacteria was observed up to limit concentrations. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.

3-(Triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile has been tested for cytogenicity in mammalian cells in a key study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP (BioReliance, 2004b). The substance was concluded to be negative for the induction of structural and numerical chromosome aberrations in CHO cells in both the activated and non-activated test systems.

Further in vitro testing is not considered necessary as the substance is used as a transported isolated intermediate.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available information for the substance indicates that 3-(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile does not induce mutations in bacterial cells nor structural chromatid- or chromosomes-type aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells.  Therefore, it is considered that classification for mutagenicity is not required according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008