Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2010-06-18 to 2010-08-09
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study was conducted as per OECD 429 and EU B.42 test method guidelines

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
no aplica
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Charcoal
EC Number:
240-383-3
EC Name:
Charcoal
Cas Number:
16291-96-6
Molecular formula:
C
IUPAC Name:
Carbón vegetal
Details on test material:
Identity: Charcoal (Probe 1: C-Fix = 73.3%)
CAS No.: 16291-96-6
Batch No.: 19062009 1PP
Purity: C-Fix: 73.3%; dose calculation not adjusted to purity
Storage: At room temperature, moisture protected
Expiration Date: December 2030

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CBA/CaOlaHsd
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Animals: Female mice of 8-12 weeks of age and with 19-23 g of body weight were included in the study; Housing: Animals were individually housed; Lighting: 12 h light/12 h dark; Temperature: 22 ± 2°C; Relative humidity: 35 to 85%; Food: Animals had access to pelleted standard diet, ad libitum; Water: Tap water, ad libitum; Bedding: Granulated soft wood bedding; Acclimatisation: Study animals were acclimated to their housing for 5 days prior to their first day of dosing.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Remarks:
99% pureza
Concentration:
3 groups of 4 female mice were treated on the dorsal surface of both ears once per day for 3 days with the test article, charcoal (Probe 1: C-Fix = 73.3%) at 2.5, 5, and 10% (w/w) in the vehicle propylene glycol.
No. of animals per dose:
4 ratas hembra
Details on study design:
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: Local Lymph Node Assay
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: A 3-fold or greater increase in proliferative activity relative to the concurrent vehicle control is considered a positive response.

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
On each day of dosing, the test article was prepared at the appropriate concentrations (w/w) by suspending the appropriate amount of test article in propylene glycol. The application volume of 25 µL was used.

4 groups of 4 female mice were treated on the dorsal surface of both ears once per day for 3 consecutive days as follows:
Group 1: vehicle, propylene glycol; Group 2: Charcoal, 2.5% (w/w); Group 3: Charcoal, 5% (w/w); and Group 4: Charcoal 10% (w/w)

On day 6, the mice were injected, i.v., with 20.4 µCi of 3H-Methyl thymidine (3HTdR) per mouse. Five hours later, the mice were euthanized and the draining auricular lymph nodes were removed. The lymph node cells were treated with 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) to precipitate the DNA. The resulting pellets were counted in a β-scintillation counter to determine incorporation of 3HTdR.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Statistics:
The mean values and standard deviations were calculated for the body weight parameter.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The positive control, HCA at 10% and 25% resulted in a stimulation index (SI) of 3.41 and 6.14, respectively. A 3-fold or greater increase in proliferative activity relative to the concurrent vehicle control is considered a positive response.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: SI: Vehicle control = 1.00; Charcoal (2.5% w/v) = 0.65; Charcoal (5% w/v) = 0.72; and Charcoal (10% w/v) = 1.11
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: DPM per lymph node: Vehicle control = 295.6; Charcoal (2.5% w/v) = 192.7; Charcoal (5% w/v) = 211.4; and Charcoal (10% w/v) = 329.3

Any other information on results incl. tables

 

% Concentración elemento de prueba la (w/w)

Grupo

Medición DPM

Cálculo

Resultado

DPM-Guna)

Nº de ganglios linfáticos

DPM por los ganglios linfáticos b)

SI

---

BG I

20

---

---

---

---

---

BG II

17

---

---

---

---

0

1

2383

2365

8

295,6

1,00

2.5

2

1560

1542

8

192,7

0,65

5

3

1710

1692

8

211,4

0,72

10

4

2653

2635

8

329,3

1,11

Bg =    Antecedentes (1 ml 5% de ácido tricloroacético) por duplicado

1      =    Grupo de Control

2-4 =    Grupos de prueba

IE =    Índice de Estimulación

a)     =    El valor medio fue tomado de la I y II cifras BG

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information up to 10% (w/w) of charcoal Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
no sensibilizante bajo condiciones de estudio