Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2009-10-12 to 2010-01-11
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well performed study according to OECD Technical Guidelines.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
24 April 2002
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Certificate attached to the report

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-(2,2-dimethoxyethyl)prop-2-enamide
EC Number:
610-472-5
Cas Number:
49707-23-5
Molecular formula:
C7 H13 N1 O3
IUPAC Name:
N-(2,2-dimethoxyethyl)prop-2-enamide
Details on test material:
- Sponsor's identification: NAAADA
- Container: plastic flask (n=1)
- Quantity: 51.80g (container and contents)
- Batch no: 700090909
- Production date: 09 September 2009
- CAS No of the main ingredients: 2226-96-2
- Date received: 16 September 2009
- Form: liquid
- Colour: yellow
- Storage: +4°C +/-4°C
- Expiry date: 09 January 2010
- Purity: >96%
- The item was used as supplied

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Supplied by: Elevage de Gérome (Quartier Labaste, F-40260 Linxe)
- Acclimitsation period: 5 days
- Weight at beginning of test: 2.99 - 3.37kg
- Age at beginning of test: 14 weeks

- Each animal was kept in an individual box installed in conventional air conditioned animal husbanding
- Temperature: 17-23°C
- Relative humidity: 30-70%
- Air exchange rate was approximately 15 timer per hour
- Housing was illuminated by aritificial light in a 12hrs lighting / 12hrs darkness cycle

- Drinking water: tap-water from public distribution system, ad libitum
- Foodstuff: SDS-C15, ad libitum
- Microbial and chemical analyses of the water were carried out once every six months by the IPL, Santé, Environment Durables - Atlantique

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: The untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1mL of the test item was instilled into the conjuncitival sac of one eye
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1d
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48, 72 hrs following treatment
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Three (initially, a single animal was treated. After consideration of the ocular responses produced in the first treated animal at day one, two additional animals were treated)
Details on study design:
- 0.1mL of the test item was instilled into the conjunctival sac of one eye
- The other eye remained untreated serving as control
- Intially, a single animal was treated
- After consideration of the ocular responses produced in the first treated animal at day 1, two additional animals were treated

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean value
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean value
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean value
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.4
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
i.e. redness
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean value
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
i.e. redness
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean value
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
i.e. redness
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean value
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: See Table 1

Any other information on results incl. tables

Scoring according to OECD 405

Table 1: Individual and mean scores of conjunctivae, iris and cornea

Animal n°

Time after
treatment

CONJUNCTIVAE

IRIS

CORNEA

CHEMOSIS (A)

REDNESS (C)

LESION (D)

OPACITY (E)

A9821

24 hours

0

1

0

0

48 hours

0

0

0

0

72 hours

0

0

0

0

TOTAL

0

1

0

0

Mean

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.0

A9824

24 hours

0

1

0

1

48 hours

0

1

0

0

72 hours

0

0

0

0

TOTAL

0

2

0

1

Mean

0.0

0.7

0.0

0.3

A9830

24 hours

0

1

0

0

48 hours

0

0

0

0

72 hours

0

0

0

0

TOTAL

0

1

0

0

Mean

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.0

CLASSIFICATION
in accordance with 67/548/EEC

According to the calculated means, the item is not be classified.

CLASSIFICATION
in accordance with 1272/2008/EC

According to the calculated means, the item iss not be classified.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
In accordance with the Globally Harmonized System (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008), the test item is not to be classified. No signal word and hazard statement are required.
Executive summary:

The test item NAAADA was instilled as supplied, into the eye of 3 New Zealand rabbits at the dose of 0.1 mL. The experimental protocol was established on the basis of the official method as defined in the OECD Guideline 405 dated April 24th, 2002 and the test method B.5 of the council regulation no 440/2008.

The ocular conjunctivae reactions observed during the study have been slight and totally reversible in the three animals: a slight redness, noted 1 hour after the test item instillation and totally reversible between day 2 and day 3, associated with a slight chemosis, only noted 1 hour after the test item instillation.

A slight corneal opacity was noted in one animal on day 1 and was totally reversible on day 2.

In conclusion the results obtained under these experimental conditions enable to conclude that the test item NAAADA is not to be classified according to the criteria for the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances in compliance with the EEC Directive no 67/548, 2001/59 and 99/45. No symbol and warning label are required.

In accordance with the Globally Harmonized System (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008), the test item is not to be classified. No signal word and hazard statement are required.