Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
May 27 - June 25, 2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study performed according to OECD TG 429

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2008
Report date:
2008

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Netherlands B.V. Postbus 6174 NL - 5960 AD Horst
- Age at study initiation: 8-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 21.5+/- 1.6 g
- Housing: single
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 + 3°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: day 1 To: day 6

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
other: ethanol/water = 70/30
Concentration:
0.5, 1, and 2.5%.
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Experiment 1:
- number of animals: 2
- Concentrations: 5, 10, 25, and 50 % on one ear each
- Exposure duration/frequency: 3 consecutive days
- Observations: clinical signs 24 ± 4 hours after each application
- Results:
@5 and 10 %: no local signs of irritation but reduced spontaneous activity on day 6
@25 and 50%: reduced spontaneous activity after the first application of the test item and was found dead prior to the third application.

Experiment 2:
- number of animals: 2
- Concentrations: 5, and 10 % on both ears
- Exposure duration/frequency: 3 consecutive days
- Observations: clinical signs 24 ± 4 hours after each application
- Results:
@5 %: no local signs of irritation but reduced spontaneous activity on day 6
@10%: reduced spontaneous activity

Experiment 3:
- number of animals: 2
- Concentrations: 1, and 2.5 % on both ears
- Exposure duration/frequency: 3 consecutive days
- Observations: clinical signs 24 ± 4 hours after each application
- Results: no signs of systemic toxicity and no signs of local irritation have been observed

MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: OECD 429
- Concentrations: 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 %
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: Stimulation index > 3
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Statistics:
Standard statistical methods have been applied for data processing.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Conc. SI
0%: 1.0
5% 1.78
10% 1.84
25% 4.87

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: Control: 1 0.5%: 2.34 1.0%: 1.36 2.5% 2.11
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: Control: 385.1 0.5%: 901.9 1.0%: 524.2 2.5% 812.1

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
Conclusions:
From the data it can be concluded that the test item is not a skin sensitiser under the conditions of this assay.
Executive summary:

Study Design

In the study the test item formulated in ethanol/deionized water (70/30) was assessed for its possible skin sensitising potential. For this purpose a local lymph node assay was performed using test item concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5% (w/w). The concentrations have been selected in order to avoiding systemic toxicity and excessive local skin irritation as confirmed by a pre-experiment.
This study was performed according to GLP and the methods applied are fully compliant with OECD TG 429.

Results

The animals did not show any signs of systemic toxicity or local skin irritation during the course of the study and no cases of mortality were observed. The animals treated with 2.5 % of the test item had a slight increase in ear thickness that was statistically significant even though erythema formation was not observed. At lower concentrations a relevant increase in ear thickness did not occur.
In this study Stimulation Indices (S.I.) of 2.34, 1.36, and 2.11 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5% (w/w)  in ethanol/deionized water (70/30), respectively.

Conclusion

The test item was not a skin sensitiser under the test conditions of this study.