Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test system:
human skin model
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Value:
> 50
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Disks of EPISKIN (three units) were treated with test item and incubated for 15 minutes (± 0.5 min) at room temperature. Exposure of test material was terminated by rinsing with 1x PBS solution. Epidermis units were then incubated at 37 ± 1°C for 42 hours (± 1 h) in an incubator with 5 ± 1% CO2, ≥ 95 % humidified atmosphere. The viability of each disk was assessed by incubating the tissues for 3 hours (± 5 min) with MTT solution at 37 ± 1°C in 5 ± 1 % CO2 protected from light. The precipitated formazan was then extracted using acidified isopropanol and quantified spectrophotometrically.
The test item has an intrinsic colour (beige), therefore two additional test item treated tissues were used for the non-specific OD evaluation (NSCliving).
The test item is a MTT-reducer, therefore additional controls (test item treated killed tissues and negative control treated killed tissues) were used to detect and correct for test substance interference with the viability measurement.
The test item is a MTT-reducer and has an intrinsic colour (beige). To avoid a possible double correction [TODTT (MTT and NSCliving)] for colour interference, a third control for non-specific colour in killed tissues (NSCkilled) was performed. Two killed test item treated tissues were used to avoid a possible double correction for colour interference. However, the NSCliving % was 2.9 % (below 5 %), so the (NSCkilled) was not determined and used during the calculation of true MTT metabolic conversion.
SDS (5% aq.) and 1× PBS treated (three units / positive and negative control) epidermis were used as positive and negative controls respectively. For each treated tissue viability was expressed as a percentage relative to negative control.
The test chemical is identified as requiring classification and labelling according to UN GHS (Category 2 or Category 1), if the mean relative viability after 15 minutes exposure and 42 hours post incubation is less or equal (≤) to 50 % of the negative control.
In this in vitro skin irritation test using the EPISKIN model, the test item IRON GLYCINATE did not show significantly reduced cell viability in comparison to the negative control (mean value: 97 %). All obtained test item viability results were far above 50 % when compared to the viability values obtained from the negative control. Therefore the test item was considered to be non-irritant to skin.
Positive and negative controls showed the expected cell viability values within acceptable limits. The experiment was considered to be valid.
The results obtained from this in vitro skin irritation test, using the EPISKIN model, indicated that the test item reveals no skin irritation potential under the utilised testing conditions. The test item IRON GLYCINATE is considered to be non-irritant to skin and is therefore not classified (UN GHS No Category).
Executive summary:

The results obtained from this in vitro skin irritation test, using the EPISKIN model, indicated that the test item reveals no skin irritation potential under the utilised testing conditions. The test item IRON GLYCINATE is considered to be non-irritant to skin and is therefore not classified (UN GHS No Category).

Endpoint:
skin irritation / corrosion, other
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
GLP compliance:
yes
Test system:
human skin model
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Value:
>= 74
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The results obtained from this in vitro skin corrosion test, using the EPISKIN model, indicated that the test item reveals no skin corrosion potential under the utilised testing conditions. In conclusion, the test item FERROUS GLYCINATE can be classified as Non-corrosive to skin.
Executive summary:

The test substance is not irritating in vitro test.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 438 (Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
GLP compliance:
yes
Irritation parameter:
percent corneal swelling
Value:
4
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
In this ICET, IRON GLYCINATE did not cause ocular corrosion or severe irritation in the enucleated chicken eyes. The overall ICE classes were once I (based on the corneal swelling of 4% within 240 minutes), once II (based on the fluorescein retention of 0.8) and once III (based on the corneal opacity score of 1.7).
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
According to the guideline OECD 438, IRON GLYCINATE overall in vitro classification is neither UN GHS Classification Category I (an ocular corrosive or severe eye irritant) nor No Category. Thus, according to the guideline OECD 438, test item has been categorized as “No prediction can be made”.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

no data

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the test results, no classification for skin and eye irritation is needed.