Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 269-027-5 | CAS number: 68171-38-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://www.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_ecotoxicological-information.png)
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16 - 19 Jan 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Adopted 23 March 2006
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Version / remarks:
- 29 December 1992
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The department of health of the government of the United Kingdom, Brixham, UK
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Remarks:
- LC-MS/MS
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: culture medium control, solvent control and nominal concentrations of 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50 and 1.0 mg/L
- Sampling method: At study start, samples were taken from excess test solutions and at study end from the test vessels of the dilution water control, solvent control and each test concentration. At 0-h, an aliquot was removed from each of the excess dosing solutions (three aliquots for 0.125 mg/L) and an equivalent volume of THF was added (resulting in a ×2 dilution). The sample was mixed and an aliquot transferred to an LCMS vial for analysis. At 72-h sampling occasion, an aliquot was removed from a single test vessel for each concentration (three test vessels for 0.125 mg/L) and an equivalent volume of THF was added (resulting in a ×2 dilution). The sample was mixed and an aliquot transferred to an LCMS vial for analysis. - Vehicle:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethylformamide (DMF)
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: A primary stock concentrate of the substance, with a nominal concentration of 10 g/L, was prepared by adding a nominal 0.100 g of test substance (actual weight 0.10056 g) and making up to 10 mL with the solvent Dimethylformamide (DMF) in a volumetric flask. The stock was shaken to mix and observed to be clear and colorless. The stock was used to prepare the test solutions by direct addition of the appropriate amount, using a microliter syringe, to stirring dilution water in a volumetric flask.
- Differential loading: yes
- Controls: The solvent control was prepared in the same way as the test concentrations using solvent only
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): Dimethylformamide (DMF)
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution(s) or suspension(s) including control(s)): 0.1 mL/L
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc.): no - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: green algae
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): laboratory culture
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 4-day old culture, in the exponential growth phase
- Method of cultivation: same as test - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 21.7 - 22.2 °C
- pH:
- 7.29 - 7.83
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: control, solvent control, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50 and 1.0 mg/L
Mean measured:- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL glass conical flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed with foam bungs
- Fill volume: 100 mL
- Initial cells density: 0.5 × 10E+04 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: Control: 38.93 × 10E+04 cells/mL, Solvent control: 39.62 × 10E+04 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): 6
- Other: One blank vessel (without algal inoculum) was incubated concurrently for each control and test concentration sampling occasion.
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes, AAP-medium according to guideline
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: according to guideline
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement: The pH of the control and test solutions was measured at the start of the test, using the excess remaining after filling the test vessels. At the end of the test the pH of one replicate vessel (containing algae) from each test concentration was determined. The temperature of the incubator was measured daily. The light intensity was measured once during the study, in each of four representative positions, using a photometer.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: continuous illumination
- Light intensity and quality: "cool-white" illumination, 6380 lx
- Other: orbital shaking at 160 rpm
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of cell concentrations: Algal cell densities of the inoculum and test cultures were determined after 24, 48, and 72 h by electronic particle counting, using a Coulter counter and counting between a lower and upper threshold equivalent spherical diameter of approx. 2.3 and 5.0 μm, respectively.
- Other: At the end of the test microscopic observations were made on samples taken from a single replicate of the control and each test substance concentration.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study: yes, non-GLP
- Test concentrations: culture medium control, solvent control and nominal test concentrations of 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50 and 1.0 mg/L (without analytical confirmation of the test concentrations)
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: No toxicity effects were observed in any concentration or control- Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 0.59 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 0.59 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes, 79.4 and 80.9 fold biomass increase over the 72 h for the control and solvent control respectively.
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): The microscopic observations, made at the end of the test, showed that compared to the control the algal cells sampled from the solvent control and each test concentration appeared normal.
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: The stock was observed to be clear and colorless.
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: No effects observed.BIOLOGICAL RESULTS:
Table 1: Algal cell particle density.
Nominal concentration (mg/L) Measured concentration (mg/L) Replicate Algal cell particle density (10E+4 cells/mL) 24 h 48 h 72 h Culture medium control 0 A 2.47 9.59 37.9 B 2.25 9.6 34.3 C 2.85 10.6 39.9 D 2.74 10.4 40.5 E 2.89 10.3 40.5 F 2.81 10.3 40.5 Mean 2.67 10.13 38.93 Solvent control 0 A 2.8 10.6 40.1 B 2.78 10.2 35.9 C 2.85 10.3 40.2 D 3.05 10.6 41.4 E 2.78 10.2 40.9 F 2.66 9.99 39.2 Mean 2.82 10.32 39.62 0.0625 0.036 A 2.81 10.6 41 B 3.02 10.6 39.6 C 2.82 10 39 Mean 2.88 10.4 39.87 0.125 0.068 A 2.87 10.8 39.2 B 2.94 10.2 37.9 C 2.93 9.93 36.8 Mean 2.91 10.31 37.97 0.25 0.15 A 2.97 10.3 38 B 2.95 10.1 38.8 C 3.06 10.5 36.1 Mean 2.99 10.3 37.63 0.5 0.29 A 3 10.5 38.2 B 2.91 11.1 39.3 C 2.93 10.1 35.2 Mean 2.95 10.57 37.57 1 0.59 A 3.02 10.2 39.4 B 3.01 10.1 39.9 C 2.62 11 37 Mean 2.88 10.43 38.77 Table 2: Mean growth rates over the test period.
Measured concentration (mg/L) Mean growth rate/day (0-72 hours) Mean growth rate/day 95% Cl Percentage of solvent control (%) 0 1.457 1.434 - 1.481 100 0 1.464 1.446 - 1.482 - 0.036 1.466 1.445 - 1.487 100 0.068 1.45 1.423 - 1.476 99 0.15 1.447 1.416 - 1.477 99 0.29 1.446 1.399 - 1.493 99 0.59 1.457 1.423 - 1.490 100 Further effect values reported in the study:
- LOEC > 0.59
- ErC20 > 0.59
- EyC50 > 0.59
- EyC20 > 0.59
- EyC10 > 0.59
ANALYTICAL RESULTS:
Table 3: Analytical results.
Nominal concentration (mg/L) Measured concentration Mean measured concentration (mg/L) Mean measured concentration (%) 0 h 72 h (mg/L) % of nominal (mg/L) % of nominal Control <LOQ - <LOQ - 0 - Solvent Control <LOQ - <LOQ - 0 - 0.0625 0.72 115 <LOQ - 0.036 58 0.125 0.14a 109 <LOQb - 0.068 55 0.25 0.29 118 <LOQ - 0.15 59 0.5 0.59 117 <LOQ - 0.29 59 1 1.2 118 <LOQ - 0.59 59 a Mean of triplicate analyses: 0.14, 0.13, 0.14 mg/L
b Mean of triplicate analyses: <LOQ, <LOQ, <LOQ mg/L
The limit of quantification (LOQ) in this study was 0.04 mg/L for all test solutions. The instrument LOQ was 0.02 mg/L but during analysis, samples from the control and each test concentration were diluted ×2, doubling the LOQ.
VALIDITY CRITERIA:
Table 4: Validity criteria for OECD 201.
Criterion from the guideline
Outcome
Validity criterion fulfilled
The biomass in the control cultures should have increased exponentially by a factor of at least 16 within the 72-hour test period.
79.4 and 80.9 fold biomass increase over the 72 hours for the control and solvent control respectively.
yes
The mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates (days 0-1, 1-2 and 2-3, for 72-hour tests) in the control cultures must not exceed 35%
14% for the control and 17% for the solvent control.
yes
The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during the whole test period in replicate control cultures must not exceed 7% in tests with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Desmodesmus subspicatus. For other less frequently tested species, the value should not exceed 10%.
1.5% for the control and 1.2% for the solvent control.
yes
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- For further details please refer to “Any other information on results incl. tables”.
Reference
Description of key information
ErC50 (72 h) = 0.59 mg/L (arithm. mean meas.) for Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (OECD 201)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
One study is available testing the toxicity of the substance on algae. The study (2018) was conducted according to the OECD guideline 201 and under GLP standards. Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was exposed for 72 h to the nominal test item concentrations of 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50 and 1.0 mg/L (nominal). Since the substance is poorly soluble in water a non-GLP solubility trial was performed prior to test start with different preparation methods of the stock solution. On this basis, dimethylformamide (DMF) was used as a solvent in a final concentration of 0.1 mL/L for the preparation of the final test solutions. Therefore, a dilution water and a solvent control were included in the test. All solutions were clear and colourless at test start. An analytical monitoring took place and all tested concentrations including the control and the solvent control were measured via LC-MS/MS at the beginning and at the end of the test.
Since the recoveries of the concentrations were < 80% the results were expressed in terms of mean measured concentrations. The study did not result any effects on the growth rate or yield of the green algae. Thus, an ErC50 (72 h) > 0.59 mg/L and an ErC10 (72 h) > 0.59 mg/L (arithm. mean meas.) were derived. All validity criteria given by the guideline were fulfilled.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)