Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1978
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1978
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Kligman, A. M. (1966). "The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers". J. Invest. Dermatol. 47: 393–409.
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
TEST MATERIAL
STYRAX ALC. SOL. TURKISH IN DEP. 78-8-8283
Species:
other: human
Strain:
other: not applicable
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Details on test animals and environmental conditions 29 healthy male and female volunteers were screened and 25 completed the study.
Age 20 - 69
Gender: 10 males, 15 females
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Vehicle:
other: petrolatum
Amount / concentration applied:
8%
Duration of treatment / exposure:
48 hours
Number of animals:
25
Details on study design:
In a pre-test for a human maximization study, a patch of the test material in petrolatum was applied to normal sites on the backs of 25 healthy male and female volunteers for 48 hours under occlusion. The skin irritation of Styrax alcohol soluble Turkish in DEP in a concentration of 8% was evaluated prior to a human maximization test and to determine whether sodium lauryl sulfate pretreatment was necessary.
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
48 h
Score:
<= 0
Reversibility:
other: not relevant
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Styrax alcohol soluble Turkish in DEP in a concentration of 8%
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
48 h
Score:
<= 0
Reversibility:
other: not relevant
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Styrax alcohol soluble Turkish in DEP in a concentration of 8%
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No skin irritation observed.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
8% Styrax alcohol soluble Turkish in DEP was not irritating to human skin under the conditions of this test.
Executive summary:

In a pre-test for a human maximization study, a patch of the test material in petrolatum was applied to normal sites on the backs of 25 healthy male and female volunteers for 48 hours under occlusion. The skin irritation of Styrax alcohol soluble Turkish in DEP in a concentration of 8% was evaluated prior to a human maximization test and to determine whether sodium lauryl sulfate pretreatment was necessary. No skin irritation observed. 8% Styrax alcohol soluble Turkish in DEP was not irritating to human skin under the conditions of this test.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1978
Report date:
1978

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Kligman, A. M. (1966). "The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers". J. Invest. Dermatol. 47: 393–409.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
other: Human maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The study was conducted before REACH came into force and before OECD test guideline 429 was published.

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Storax (balsam)
EC Number:
232-458-4
EC Name:
Storax (balsam)
Cas Number:
8046-19-3
Molecular formula:
Not applicable, UVCB - NCS
IUPAC Name:
Storax (balsam)
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
CAS 8046-19-3
For specific details on test material if available - See in RSS
Name of test material (as cited in study report or in reference): Styrax resinoid oil, Styrax oil, Styrax, Storax oil, Storax
Specific details on test material used for the study:
TEST MATERIAL
STYRAX ALC. SOL. TURKISH IN DEP. 78-8-8283

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
other: human
Strain:
other: not applicable
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
29 healthy male and female volunteers were screened and 25 completed the study.
Age 20 - 69
Gender: 10 males, 15 females

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
8%
Day(s)/duration:
for 5 alternate day 48 hour periods
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Challengeopen allclose all
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
8%
Day(s)/duration:
48 hours
Adequacy of challenge:
other: Challenge site was not pretreated
No.:
#2
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
8%
Day(s)/duration:
48 hours
Adequacy of challenge:
other: Challenge site was pretreated with 2% sodium lauryl sulfate
No. of animals per dose:
25 volunteers completed the study
Details on study design:
The materials were presented on all subjects in order to determine whether sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) pre-treatment was required. A patch of each material was applied to normal sites on the backs for 48 hours under occlusion. No significant evidence of irritation was observed and all subjects were pre-treated with 5% SLS.
The materials were applied under occlusion to the same site on the volar aspect of the forearms of all subjects for 5 alternate day 48 hour periods. Patch sites were pre-treated for 24 hours with 5% aqueous SLS under occlusion for the initial patch only.
Following a 10-14 day rest period, challenge patches of all materials were applied under occlusion to fresh sites for 48 hours. Challenge applications were preceded by 30 minute applications of 2% aqueous SLS under occlusion on the left side of the back whereas the test materials were applied without SLS treatment on the right side. Additional SLS controls were placed on the left and petrolatum on the right and labeled site 5.

Patch material: Webril cloth
Induction patch 1,5 inch square with 1.0 mL test solution
Challenge patch 1,0 inch square with 0.4 mL test solution
Challenge controls:
SLS controls were placed on the left and petrolatum on the right and labeled site 5.
Positive control substance(s):
not required

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
8%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
25
Clinical observations:
The test material produced one irritant reaction in subject #22
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
25
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
not applicable

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
No significant reactions were seen except in one subject, the site appeared irritated. It can be concluded that STYRAX ALC. SOL. TURKISH IN DEP. produced one irritant reaction.
Executive summary:

A Human maximisation test was performed according to the Kligman, 1966 procedure. 29 healthy male and female volunteers were screened and 25 completed the study. The materials were presented on all subjects in order to determine whether sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) pre-treatment was required. A patch of each material was applied to normal sites on the backs for 48 hours under occlusion. No significant evidence of irritation was observed and all subjects were pre-treated with 5% SLS. The materials were applied under occlusion to the same site on the volar aspect of the forearms of all subjects for 5 alternate day 48 hour periods. Patch sites were pre-treated for 24 hours with 5% aqueous SLS under occlusion for the initial patch only. Following a 10-14 day rest period, challenge patches of all materials were applied under occlusion to fresh sites for 48 hours. Challenge applications were preceded by 30 minute applications of 2% aqueous SLS under occlusion on the left side of the back whereas the test materials were applied without SLS treatment on the right side. Additional SLS controls were placed on the left and petrolatum on the right. No significant reactions were seen except in one subject, the site appeared irritated. It can be concluded that STYRAX ALC. SOL. TURKISH IN DEP. produced one irritant reaction.