Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 293-165-5 | CAS number: 91052-08-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test (OECD 471): negative with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102, and in E. coli WP2 uvrA pKM.
Chromosome aberration (OECD 473): negative in Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU) and human lymphocytes with and without metabolic activation.
Gene mutation in mammalian cells (OECD 476): negative in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells with and without metabolic activation.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM medium supplemented with 10% calf serum
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 6h treatment with and without S9 mix: 891, 1783, 3565 µg/mL
24h treatment without S9 mix: 55.7, 111, 223, 446 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of vehicle: due to limited solubility of the test substance in water, DMSO was selected as vehicle. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: -S9: mitomycin C (MMC), 0.1 µg/mL (6h exposure), 0.05 µg/mL (24h exposure); +S9: cyclophosphamide (CM), 10 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6 h (short treatment) and 24 h (continuous treatment)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 h (after 6 h treatment)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 h
SPINDLE INHIBITOR: 0.2 μg/mL of colcemid (added 2 h prior to harvest)
STAIN: 1.2% Giemsa stain (in sodium phosphoric acid buffer 1/100 mol/L pH 6.8) for 12 min
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 replications in one experiment
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative cell growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes - Evaluation criteria:
- 100 cells/plate were observed and classified into gap, ctd (chromatid break), cte (chromatid exchange), csb (chromosome break), cse (chromosome exchange) and oth (others). The total number of cells with aberrations excluding gaps was calculated. The number of polyploid cells was also counted.
The test results were considered positive, if a statistically significant increase in the frequency of chromosome aberrations was observed, the increase showed dose-dependency and it was reproducible. - Statistics:
- Differences in chromosome aberration frequencies between treated and control cells were analysed with the Fisher's exact test (p < 0.025). Dose-dependency was assessed using the Cochran Armitage trend test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 446 µg/mL (24 h treatment, without metabolic activation)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: the test substance was not soluble in water.
- Precipitation: visible precipitation was noted at 223 µg/mL and above.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
To find the appropriate concentration range, a cytotoxicity test was performed at test concentrations of 3565, 1783, 891, 446, 223, 111, 55.7, 27.9, 13.9, 6.96 µg/mL. Cytotoxicity was evaluated both after a continuous 24 h exposure (-S9 mix) and a short-term 6 h exposure (± S9 mix) followed by an 18 h recovery period prior to harvest.
The test substance was not cytotoxic after short-term exposure at any concentration in the presence of S9 mix. Without metabolic activation, relative growth was reduced to about 71% of the control value.
After 24 h continuous treatment without S9 mix, the test substance was not cytotoxic up to 1783 µg/mL. At 3565 µg/mL, relative growth was decreased to ca. 13 % of the control value. The concentration leading to 50% cytotoxicity was calculated to be 2738 µg/mL.
Based on these results, the main test was conducted using the following test substance concentrations:
6 h treatment (± S9 mix): 891, 1783 and 3565 µg/mL
24 h treatment (-S9 mix): 55.7, 111, 223 and 446 µg/mL
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In the main test, no cytotoxic effects were observed after short-term exposure. The test substance was cytotoxic at 446 µg/mL after the 24 h treatment. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- TK locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI medium supplemented with 10% horse serum, 200 µg/mL sodium pyruvate and 50 µg/mL gentamycin
- Properly maintained: yes (stock cultures were kept in a liquid nitrogen tank to start new stock cultures periodically in which cells were diluted daily and kept at a density of about 2E+5 to 1.5E+6)
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg bw)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment:
with and without metabolic activation: 625, 1250, 2500, 3600 and 5000 µg/mL
Second experiment:
without metabolic activation: 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 3600 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 3600 µg/mL
Repeat of second test:
without metabolic activation: 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160 and 320 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (50 µg/mL, -S9), 7,12-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene (3.3 µg/mL, +S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
First test:
- Exposure duration: +S9: 3 h, -S9: 4 h
Second main test:
- Exposure duration: +S9: 3 h, -S9: 24 h
Repeat of second main test:
- Exposure duration: -S9: 24 h
(In cell cultures with metabolic activation, the treatment period was limited to 3 h due to the cytotoxic effects induced by S9.)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 3 days (counting from the start of the experiment), cells were plated for determination of the cloning efficiency and the mutation frequency in 96-well microtitre plates. The cell density was counted and adjusted to 3E+5 cells/mL daily.
- Selection time: approx. 10 days, cells were seeded in 2 microtitre plates with a density of 2000 cells/well in TFT selctive medium to determine the number of mutants.
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 13 - 14 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): trifluorothymidine (TFT)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth (cytotoxicity corresponds to relative survival compared to the respective negative control values)
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
Cloning efficiency was determined by seeding exposed cells in one microtiter plate with a density of 2 cells/well in medium without TFT.
Small and large colonies were differentiated as small colonies are capable to indicate chromosomal mutations. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test item was considered as mutagenic when all of the following criteria were met:
- increases in the mutation frequency were observed in treated cultures compared to the corresponding negative control values at one or more test concentrations
- the increases showed a dose-response relationship
- the increases were reproducible between the replicates and the first and second test (when treatment conditions were the same)
- the increases were statistically significant
- the increases exceeded the historical negative control range
- the relative survival of the test groups was at least 15% at the end of the treatment period
When the above mentioned criteria were not met, the test item was considered as non-mutagenic. - Statistics:
- Single values of the duplicates were determined from the examined parameters. Statistical analyses were performed with the SAS (R) procedures version 8.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina 27513, USA). In detail, mutation frequencies of treated samples were compared to the correpsonding negative controls with the analyis of variance test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without S9: starting from 3600 µg/mL (first test (4 h exposure)) and 160 µg/mL (second test (24 h exposure)), with S9: starting from 2500 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The mutation frequencies of the negative and positive controls were all within the range of the historical control data despite one positive control value which was slightly higher that the historical control value. Thus, the study was considered to be valid. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 18 Oct - 29 Oct 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media:
Liquid growth medium (broth): Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2 (2.5% (w/v) in distilled water
Selective agar plates: Vogel-Bonner medium composed of bacto agar (1.5%), D-glucose (2%), MgSO4 x 7H20 (0.02%), citric acid (0.2%), K2HPO4 (1%), NaNH4HPO4 x 4 H2O (0.35%) in distilled water (percentages correspond to w/v)
The components were autoclaved separately and mixed afterwards.
Top-agar: bacto agar (0.6%), NaCl (0.5%) in distilled water (percentages correspond to w/v), supplemented with 0.05 mM histidine and 0.05 mM biotin before use - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg bw)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50, 160, 500, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: - S9: sodium azide (SA, 1 µg/plate) for TA 100 and TA 1535; 2-nitrofluorene (2NF, 1 µg/plate) for TA 98 and TA 1537; cumene hydroperoxide (CHP, 100 µg/plate for plate incorporation and 25 µg/plate for preincubation) for TA 102;
- Positive control substance:
- other: + S9: 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA, 4 µg/plate for TA 102 or 2 µg/plate for remaining strains)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
1. in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 72 h
2. preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 1 h
- Exposure duration: 72 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 replications each in 2 independent experiments including 1 plate incorporation and 1 preincubation test
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: thinning of the background lawn of non-revertant bacteria, appearance of micro-colonies and/or reduction in the number of revertant colonies on the test plates comparised to the solvent control plates - Evaluation criteria:
- The test was considered to be valid when the following criteria were met:
1. negative and positive control data were consistent and within the range of historical control data (see table 4)
2. positive controls revealed a marked increase over the concurrent solvent controls
3. the evaluation was not restricted by loss of plates (e.g. through contamination)
The test material may be considered mutagenic in this test system if all of the following criteria were met:
1. dose-related increases in the number of revertants at one or more test points
2. reproducible increases in revertants between replicate plates
3. statistically significance in the increases of revertants
4. increases count more than twice the corresponding solvent control values
The test material may be considered non-mutagenic in this test system when no increases in the number of revertants is observed which exceed 1.5 times the solvent control values at any test point. Sporadically ocurring statistically significanct increases in the number of revertants which were not dose-related will usually be considered incidental and not relevant for the evaluation.
Increases between 1.5 and 2 fold compared to the respective solvent controls meeting the other criteria for a positive result were considered to demonstrate weak mutagenicity. - Statistics:
- Statistical analyses were performed with the SAS (R) procedures version 8.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina 27513, USA).
In detail, the number of revertant colonies at each treatment test point were compared to the corresponding solvent control values using the Analysis of Variance test. Statistically significant differences were further evaluated via Dunnett´s test to determine the statistical significance of increases and decreases in the number of revertant colonies for each set of triplicates. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: no but tested up to limit concentrations (a small reduction in the number of revertants was induced in TA 100 (5000 µg: -15% (preincubation assay, +S9) and TA 1535 (160 µg: -28%; 1600 µg: -46%; 5000 µg: -30% (plate incorporation assay, + S9))
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The test item did not induce toxicity within the conducted preliminary toxicity test as evaluated by large reductions in the number of revertants or poor growth of the background lawn of non-revertant bacteria either in the absence or presence of S9 mix (see table 1).
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The solvent and positive control values were acceptable and compatible with the historical control values (slight increases have been determined in number of revertants for TA 102 in the plate incorporation (-S9: 470 ± 6 vs 409) and preincubation test (+S9: 460 ± 4 vs 432) and for TA 1535 in the plate incorporation assay after treatment with sodium azide (-S9: 1063 ± 83 vs 908), see table 4). - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 16 Oct - 18 Apr 2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- primary culture, other: human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg bw)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary toxicity test:
with and without metabolic activation: 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
First experiment (and repeat tests):
without metabolic activation: 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 625, 1250, 2500, 3600 and 5000 µg/mL
Second experiment:
without metabolic activation: 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 625, 1250, 2500, 3600 and 5000 µg/mL
without metabolic activation (repeat): 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160 and 320 µg/mL
Only slides from cultures of the following dose groups were selected for metaphase analyses:
First experiment:
without metabolic activation: 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 625, 1250 and 2500 µg/mL
Second experiment:
without metabolic activation (repeat): 40, 80 and 160 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 625, 1250 and 2500 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: daunomycin (0.015 µg/mL, -S9), cyclophosphamide (6 µg/mL, +S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
Preliminary test and first main test:
- Exposure duration: 3 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation of cells): 20 h (approx. 1.5 cell cycles)
Second main test:
- Exposure duration: +S9: 3 h, -S9: 20 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation of cells): 20 h (approx. 1.5 cell cycles)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): demecolcine (0.1 µg/mL)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 3% Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: at least 100 metaphases (when possible) and 1000 cells for the determination of mitotic index
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index (calculated as percentage of cells in metaphases)
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes, defined as metaphases with multiples of the haploid chromosome number other than diploid (e.g. 3n, 4n etc.) and determined in 200 metaphases
- Determination of endoreplication: yes, defined by the presence of chromosomes with 4, 8 chromatids and determined in 200 metaphases - Evaluation criteria:
- EVALUATION OF RESULTS
The study was considered as valid when:
- the negative control cultures showed a low frequency of metaphases with chromosome aberrations, normally 0 - 3% (excluding gaps)
- the positive control cultures showed a clear increase in the frequency of metaphases with chromosome aberrations
For the evaluation of the results, the number of metaphases with chromosome aberrations of each test condition were compared to the concurrent negative control. Gaps were recorded but excluded from the analyses.
The test material was considered clastogenic in this test system if all of the following criteria were met:
1. increases in the frequency of chromosome aberrations were determined at one or more test concentrations
2. reproducible increases in aberrant chromosomes between replicates
3. statistically significance in the increases of chromosome aberrations
4. increases exceed the historical negative control range
5. increases were not associated with large changes in pH or osmolarity
The evidence of a dose-response relation ship was considered to support the conclusion.
The test material was considered non-clastogenic in this test system when the increase in chromosomal aberrations was not statistically significanct and/or no reproducibility was observed.
Results which failed to meet the above mentioned criteria were considered as equivocal. - Statistics:
- When appropriate, Fischer´s Exact Test was performed to evaluate statistical significance.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- primary culture, other: human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- dose-related toxicity which reduced the mitotic index in the high-dose group (5000 µg/mL) to 64% of the vehicle control without metabolic activation and to 10% with metabolic activation (table 1)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- First main test
As the frequencies of metaphases with chromosomal aberrations were in general unacceptably high (4% for the duplicates without metabolic activation and 7 or 3% for the duplicates with metabolic activation), the repetition of the first experiment was conducted with the identical experimental design as the initial test. The values for chromosome aberrations within the test samples were between 1 and 9%, but they were not reproducible between the replicates nor did they show any dose-related effect (the data from the initial experiment are not included in the study report).
Scoring of slides prepared from the repeat of the initial experiment revealed no appropriate increases in chromosomal aberrations within the positive control samples without metabolic activation. Thus, this part of the test was considered as invalid and therefore repeated.
Second main test
As the samples without metabolic activation revealed mean mitotic indices lower than 50% of the solvent control in all dose groups (data not shown), this part of the test was repeated with lower dosages in the second test (table 3).
Polyploid and endoreduplicated metaphases
Single polyploid metaphases were observed at few test points without showing a dose-relation ship. Therefore, this effect is considered as incidental and not treatment-related. In contrast, no endoreduplicated metaphases were observed.
In each test group despite the two positive controls treated with cyclophosphamide, 100 metaphases were counted. In the cyclophosphamide treated samples only 59 and 30 scorable metaphases were detected.
Test validity
The frequency of metaphases with chromosomal aberrations in the solvent controls was compatible to the historical control values (table 4). The positive controls produced statistically significant increases in the frequency of metaphases with chromosomal aberrations in the valid parts of the tests, thereby demonstrating the sensitivity of the test and the efficacy of the S9 mix. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 09 Apr - 24 Apr 2010
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. Due to growth inhibition in Salmonella, but not in E.coli strains, only low test concentrations used.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- low test substance concentrations in Salmonella strains used, cytotoxic effects (growth inhibition) not further specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Phenobarbital (PB) and 5,6-benzoflavone (BF)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.61, 1.2, 2.4, 4.9, 10, 20, 39, and 78 µg/plate without metablic activation: TA 100, TA1535, TA98 and TA1537
10, 20, 39, 78, 156, and 313 µg/plate with metabolic activation: TA 100, TA1535, TA98 and TA1537
313, 625, 1250, 2500, and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation: E. coli WP2 uvr A - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Based on the information from the sponsor that the test substance was insoluble in water, a solubility test was performed with DMSO and acetone. The test substance was insoluble at 50 mg/mL in DMSO, and was dissolved at 100 mg/mL in acetone, and neither exothermic reaction nor generation of gas was observed. Therefore acetone was used as solvent for preparation. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: +S9: Benzo(a)pyrene (5.0 µg/plate for TA100, TA98 and TA1537); 2-Aminoanthracene (2.0 and 10.0 µg/plate for TA1535 and WP2 uvrA)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: -S9: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide (0.01 and 0.1 µg/plate for TA100, WP2 uvrA and TA98, respectively); 2-Methoxy-6-chloro-9-(3-(2-chloroethyl)aminopropylamino)acridine.2HCl (1.0 µg/plate for TA1537); sodium azide (0.5 µg/plate for TA1535)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation);
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two replications each in 3 independent experiments.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: growth inhibition - Evaluation criteria:
- If the number of revertant colonies on the test plates increased significantly in comparison with that on the control plates ( based on twice as many as that of the negative control), and dose-response and reproducibility were also observed, the test substance was to be judged postive.
- Statistics:
- The results at each concentration were demonstrated with the mean and the standard deviation.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Growth inhibition of the tested bacterium by the test substance was observed at concentrations of 10 µg/plate and above in the absence of metabolic activation as well as at concentrations of 156 µg/plate and above in the presence of metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: insoluble
- Precipitation:Yes, at 1250 µg/plate without metabolic activation and at 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the preliminary test, the growth inhibition by the test substance was observed at 20 µg/plate and in S. typhimurim TA98, TA1537 without metabolic activation, and at 78 µg/plate and in S. typhimurim TA100, TA1535 without metabolic activation, and at 313 µg/plate and in S. typhimurim TA strains with metabolic activation. Therefore, as the highest dose level of the test substance in the main tests, the 20 µg/plate dose was selected for S. typhimurim TA98, TA1537 without metabolic activation, and the 78 µg/ plate was selected for S. typhimurim TA100, TA1535 without metabolic activation, and the 313 µg/plate dose was selected for S. typhimurim TA strains with metabolic activation, and these highest dose was diluted 5 times (using a ratio of 2) to provide a total of 6 dose levels. And the 5000 µg/plate dose was selected for E.coli WP2uvrA both with and without metabolic activation, and this highest dose was diluted 4 times (using a common ratio of 2) to provide a total of 5 dose levels. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 03 May 2010 - 12 Jun 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: CHL/IU
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 6h treatment with and without S9-mix: 0.02, 0.39, 0.078 and 0.156 mg/mL
24 and 48h treatment without S9-mix: 0.078, 0.156, 0.313, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 mg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Based on the information from the sponsor, the test substance was insoluble in water and physiological saline. And the solubility test was performed with DMSO and acetone. The test substance was insoluble at 500.0 mg/mL in DMSO, and was dissolved at 500.0 mg/mL in acetone, and neither generation of gas nor exothermic reaction was observed. Therefore acetone was selected as solvent in this study. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without S9-mix Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.1 µg/mL ( 6 h treatment), 0.05 µg/mL (24 and 48 h treatment)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- with S9-mix Migrated to IUCLID6: 7 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6, 24 and 48 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 h after 6 h treatment
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 0.2 µg/mL colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 0.1% crystal violet solution
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes, cells carrying greater than 38 chromosomes including triploid were recorded as polyploidy - Evaluation criteria:
- The following criteria were set to evaluate the frequency of aberrant cells in each dose group:
A final judgment was concluded excluding gaps, nevertheless, separate records were kept for both including and excluding gaps.
Negative (-) less than 5%
Equivocal (+-) 5% or more, less than 10%
Positive (+) 10% or more - Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: CHU/IU
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: at concentrations of 0.078 µg/mL and higher
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the results of the cell growth inhibition test, the dose of 50% cell growth inhibition was 5.0 mg/mL and
more all of without S9 mix, with S9 mix, 24 h and 48 h exposure. In addition, the cell growth inhibition was observed, though the cell growth rate was more than 50% at the 0.156~1.25 mg/mL doses of the 24 h exposure and the 0,313~1.25 mg/mL doses of 48 h exposure.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Yes - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type:
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 20 Jun - 29 Jun 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. No TA102 or E. coli strain included.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no TA102 or E. coli strain included
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First and second experiment: 8, 40, 200, 1000, 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Tween 80/bidist. water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The suspension medium was chosen according to the solubility properties tested preliminary before start of the study. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: without S9: sodium azide (2 µg/plate) for TA100 and TA1535, 9-aminoacridine (80 µg/plate) for TA1537, 4-nitro-o-phenylendiamine (40 µg/plate) for TA98 and TA1538; with S9: 2-aminoanthracene (2.5 or 5 µg/plate) for all strains
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates each in 2 independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background lawn and/or reduced number of revertants versus negative control - Evaluation criteria:
- The results were considered positive if the following criteria were met:
- the plate background of not-reverted bacteria did not show any no growth reduction in comparison to the respective negative controls,
- the spontaneous mutation rates of each tester strain per plate were within the characteristic spontaneous mutation range,
- the positive controls showed mutation rates exceeding the control values of TA100 at least by the factor 2 and those of the other tester strains at least by the factor 3,
-at more than one dose tested, the test substance caused at least a 2-fold increase in comparison with the negative controls in the tester strain TA100. For the other tester strains, an increase in the mutation rate of more than 3 above the corresponding negative controls was considered positive. - Statistics:
- Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 5000 µg/plate: TA 1535
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well-documented publication meeting basic scientific principles. Test compound was a mixture of short- and long-chain acyl triglyceride.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- exposure duration not reported;
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The SALATRIM family of triacylglycerols differs from other fats in the ratio of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) to long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) and in that stearic acid is the major LCFA. These fats have caloric availability values (4.5-6 kcal/g) lower than that of corn oil (9 kcal/g). SALATRIM 23CA Lot
A014, a typical SALATRIM fat, was tested in in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays including the chromosomal aberration, unscheduled DNA synthesis, and HPRT mammalian cell mutagenesis assays. Corn oil also was tested as a reference fat. Both the SALATRIM fat and corn oil were negative
in the three assays. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) CHO-K1 cells obtained from the American Type Culture Collection
- Type and identity of media: in Ham’s F12 medium with 31 µg/mL penicillin, 50 µg/mL streptomycin sulfate, and 5 % heatinactivated
fetal bovine serum (F12/5). - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- final S-9 concentration of 1 %
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL
The high dose was limited by the low solubility of the fats in the assay medium. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
Stock solutions of SALATRIM 23CA lot A014 and corn oil were made in acetone such that the acetone never exceeded 1 % of the culture. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Corn oil doses were 327.7-1000 μg/mL.
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Positive controls were EMS (200 μg/mL of culture) without metabolic activation and 3-MC (5 μg/mL of culture) with metabolic activation.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium;
DURATION
- Exposure duration: not reported
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 14-17 days
Phenotypic expression of induced mutants was conducted by incubating the cells for 7 days. Cells were subcultured every 2-3 days by trypsinizing the flask, counting the cells, and replating 2 x 10(6) cells. After the expression period, approximately 3 x 10(6) cells from each culture were seeded in 100 mL of cloning medium supplemented with TG for selection of resistant cells. Approximately 600 cells were seeded in 100 mL of TG-free medium to determine the percentage of viable cells. The cells were incubated for 14-17 days and cell colonies counted with an ARTEK colony counter. Mutant frequency (ratio of mutant cells to nonmutant cells) was calculated by dividing the number of resistant colonies by the number of unselected viable colonies.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): The selective cloning medium contained 30 µM 6-thioguanine (TG).
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: The definitive study was done in duplicate using duplicate cultures for each replicate.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
Cytotoxicity was determined by detaching the cells from the culture flask with 0.05% trypsin-0.02% EDTA. A Model 2F Coulter counter was used to determine cell numbers, and an aliquot containing at least 1-2 x 10(6) cells was added to 20 mL of F12/5 to determine phenotypic expression. The remaining cell suspension was diluted in approximately 35 mL of medium so that 500 cells were plated into two Petri dishes. After incubation for 14-17 days, cell colonies were determined. Survival was expressed as the cloning efficiency (CE) relative to the solvent control. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test results were considered positive if a dose-related increase in the number of mutant colonies occurred and the mutant frequencies of duplicate cultures treated with one or more concentrations of the test article were at least 3 times the average of those from the solvent control cultures.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: Although the test material was soluble in the acetone, turbidity was noted in the cultures, indicating solubility had been exceeded.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Preliminary experiments were done to determine cytotoxicity and aid in selection of the dose range. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
SALATRIM 23CA lot A014 presented no evidence of mutagenic potential under the conditions of the assay.
Positive controls gave the expected results, validating the assay.
Corn oil did not alter either the relative cloning efficiency or the mutation frequency of the cells.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM medium supplemented with 10% calf serum
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 6h treatment with and without S9 mix: 891, 1783, 3565 µg/mL
24h treatment without S9 mix: 55.7, 111, 223, 446 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of vehicle: due to limited solubility of the test substance in water, DMSO was selected as vehicle. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: -S9: mitomycin C (MMC), 0.1 µg/mL (6h exposure), 0.05 µg/mL (24h exposure); +S9: cyclophosphamide (CM), 10 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6 h (short treatment) and 24 h (continuous treatment)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 h (after 6 h treatment)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 h
SPINDLE INHIBITOR: 0.2 μg/mL of colcemid (added 2 h prior to harvest)
STAIN: 1.2% Giemsa stain (in sodium phosphoric acid buffer 1/100 mol/L pH 6.8) for 12 min
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 replications in one experiment
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative cell growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes - Evaluation criteria:
- 100 cells/plate were observed and classified into gap, ctd (chromatid break), cte (chromatid exchange), csb (chromosome break), cse (chromosome exchange) and oth (others). The total number of cells with aberrations excluding gaps was calculated. The number of polyploid cells was also counted.
The test results were considered positive, if a statistically significant increase in the frequency of chromosome aberrations was observed, the increase showed dose-dependency and it was reproducible. - Statistics:
- Differences in chromosome aberration frequencies between treated and control cells were analysed with the Fisher's exact test (p < 0.025). Dose-dependency was assessed using the Cochran Armitage trend test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 446 µg/mL (24 h treatment, without metabolic activation)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: the test substance was not soluble in water.
- Precipitation: visible precipitation was noted at 223 µg/mL and above.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
To find the appropriate concentration range, a cytotoxicity test was performed at test concentrations of 3565, 1783, 891, 446, 223, 111, 55.7, 27.9, 13.9, 6.96 µg/mL. Cytotoxicity was evaluated both after a continuous 24 h exposure (-S9 mix) and a short-term 6 h exposure (± S9 mix) followed by an 18 h recovery period prior to harvest.
The test substance was not cytotoxic after short-term exposure at any concentration in the presence of S9 mix. Without metabolic activation, relative growth was reduced to about 71% of the control value.
After 24 h continuous treatment without S9 mix, the test substance was not cytotoxic up to 1783 µg/mL. At 3565 µg/mL, relative growth was decreased to ca. 13 % of the control value. The concentration leading to 50% cytotoxicity was calculated to be 2738 µg/mL.
Based on these results, the main test was conducted using the following test substance concentrations:
6 h treatment (± S9 mix): 891, 1783 and 3565 µg/mL
24 h treatment (-S9 mix): 55.7, 111, 223 and 446 µg/mL
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In the main test, no cytotoxic effects were observed after short-term exposure. The test substance was cytotoxic at 446 µg/mL after the 24 h treatment. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- TK locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI medium supplemented with 10% horse serum, 200 µg/mL sodium pyruvate and 50 µg/mL gentamycin
- Properly maintained: yes (stock cultures were kept in a liquid nitrogen tank to start new stock cultures periodically in which cells were diluted daily and kept at a density of about 2E+5 to 1.5E+6)
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg bw)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment:
with and without metabolic activation: 625, 1250, 2500, 3600 and 5000 µg/mL
Second experiment:
without metabolic activation: 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 3600 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 3600 µg/mL
Repeat of second test:
without metabolic activation: 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160 and 320 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (50 µg/mL, -S9), 7,12-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene (3.3 µg/mL, +S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
First test:
- Exposure duration: +S9: 3 h, -S9: 4 h
Second main test:
- Exposure duration: +S9: 3 h, -S9: 24 h
Repeat of second main test:
- Exposure duration: -S9: 24 h
(In cell cultures with metabolic activation, the treatment period was limited to 3 h due to the cytotoxic effects induced by S9.)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 3 days (counting from the start of the experiment), cells were plated for determination of the cloning efficiency and the mutation frequency in 96-well microtitre plates. The cell density was counted and adjusted to 3E+5 cells/mL daily.
- Selection time: approx. 10 days, cells were seeded in 2 microtitre plates with a density of 2000 cells/well in TFT selctive medium to determine the number of mutants.
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 13 - 14 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): trifluorothymidine (TFT)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth (cytotoxicity corresponds to relative survival compared to the respective negative control values)
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
Cloning efficiency was determined by seeding exposed cells in one microtiter plate with a density of 2 cells/well in medium without TFT.
Small and large colonies were differentiated as small colonies are capable to indicate chromosomal mutations. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test item was considered as mutagenic when all of the following criteria were met:
- increases in the mutation frequency were observed in treated cultures compared to the corresponding negative control values at one or more test concentrations
- the increases showed a dose-response relationship
- the increases were reproducible between the replicates and the first and second test (when treatment conditions were the same)
- the increases were statistically significant
- the increases exceeded the historical negative control range
- the relative survival of the test groups was at least 15% at the end of the treatment period
When the above mentioned criteria were not met, the test item was considered as non-mutagenic. - Statistics:
- Single values of the duplicates were determined from the examined parameters. Statistical analyses were performed with the SAS (R) procedures version 8.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina 27513, USA). In detail, mutation frequencies of treated samples were compared to the correpsonding negative controls with the analyis of variance test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without S9: starting from 3600 µg/mL (first test (4 h exposure)) and 160 µg/mL (second test (24 h exposure)), with S9: starting from 2500 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The mutation frequencies of the negative and positive controls were all within the range of the historical control data despite one positive control value which was slightly higher that the historical control value. Thus, the study was considered to be valid. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 18 Oct - 29 Oct 2001
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media:
Liquid growth medium (broth): Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2 (2.5% (w/v) in distilled water
Selective agar plates: Vogel-Bonner medium composed of bacto agar (1.5%), D-glucose (2%), MgSO4 x 7H20 (0.02%), citric acid (0.2%), K2HPO4 (1%), NaNH4HPO4 x 4 H2O (0.35%) in distilled water (percentages correspond to w/v)
The components were autoclaved separately and mixed afterwards.
Top-agar: bacto agar (0.6%), NaCl (0.5%) in distilled water (percentages correspond to w/v), supplemented with 0.05 mM histidine and 0.05 mM biotin before use - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg bw)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50, 160, 500, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: - S9: sodium azide (SA, 1 µg/plate) for TA 100 and TA 1535; 2-nitrofluorene (2NF, 1 µg/plate) for TA 98 and TA 1537; cumene hydroperoxide (CHP, 100 µg/plate for plate incorporation and 25 µg/plate for preincubation) for TA 102;
- Positive control substance:
- other: + S9: 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA, 4 µg/plate for TA 102 or 2 µg/plate for remaining strains)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
1. in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 72 h
2. preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 1 h
- Exposure duration: 72 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 replications each in 2 independent experiments including 1 plate incorporation and 1 preincubation test
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: thinning of the background lawn of non-revertant bacteria, appearance of micro-colonies and/or reduction in the number of revertant colonies on the test plates comparised to the solvent control plates - Evaluation criteria:
- The test was considered to be valid when the following criteria were met:
1. negative and positive control data were consistent and within the range of historical control data (see table 4)
2. positive controls revealed a marked increase over the concurrent solvent controls
3. the evaluation was not restricted by loss of plates (e.g. through contamination)
The test material may be considered mutagenic in this test system if all of the following criteria were met:
1. dose-related increases in the number of revertants at one or more test points
2. reproducible increases in revertants between replicate plates
3. statistically significance in the increases of revertants
4. increases count more than twice the corresponding solvent control values
The test material may be considered non-mutagenic in this test system when no increases in the number of revertants is observed which exceed 1.5 times the solvent control values at any test point. Sporadically ocurring statistically significanct increases in the number of revertants which were not dose-related will usually be considered incidental and not relevant for the evaluation.
Increases between 1.5 and 2 fold compared to the respective solvent controls meeting the other criteria for a positive result were considered to demonstrate weak mutagenicity. - Statistics:
- Statistical analyses were performed with the SAS (R) procedures version 8.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina 27513, USA).
In detail, the number of revertant colonies at each treatment test point were compared to the corresponding solvent control values using the Analysis of Variance test. Statistically significant differences were further evaluated via Dunnett´s test to determine the statistical significance of increases and decreases in the number of revertant colonies for each set of triplicates. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: no but tested up to limit concentrations (a small reduction in the number of revertants was induced in TA 100 (5000 µg: -15% (preincubation assay, +S9) and TA 1535 (160 µg: -28%; 1600 µg: -46%; 5000 µg: -30% (plate incorporation assay, + S9))
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The test item did not induce toxicity within the conducted preliminary toxicity test as evaluated by large reductions in the number of revertants or poor growth of the background lawn of non-revertant bacteria either in the absence or presence of S9 mix (see table 1).
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The solvent and positive control values were acceptable and compatible with the historical control values (slight increases have been determined in number of revertants for TA 102 in the plate incorporation (-S9: 470 ± 6 vs 409) and preincubation test (+S9: 460 ± 4 vs 432) and for TA 1535 in the plate incorporation assay after treatment with sodium azide (-S9: 1063 ± 83 vs 908), see table 4). - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 16 Oct - 18 Apr 2002
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- primary culture, other: human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg bw)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary toxicity test:
with and without metabolic activation: 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
First experiment (and repeat tests):
without metabolic activation: 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 625, 1250, 2500, 3600 and 5000 µg/mL
Second experiment:
without metabolic activation: 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 625, 1250, 2500, 3600 and 5000 µg/mL
without metabolic activation (repeat): 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160 and 320 µg/mL
Only slides from cultures of the following dose groups were selected for metaphase analyses:
First experiment:
without metabolic activation: 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 625, 1250 and 2500 µg/mL
Second experiment:
without metabolic activation (repeat): 40, 80 and 160 µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 625, 1250 and 2500 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: daunomycin (0.015 µg/mL, -S9), cyclophosphamide (6 µg/mL, +S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
Preliminary test and first main test:
- Exposure duration: 3 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation of cells): 20 h (approx. 1.5 cell cycles)
Second main test:
- Exposure duration: +S9: 3 h, -S9: 20 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation of cells): 20 h (approx. 1.5 cell cycles)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): demecolcine (0.1 µg/mL)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 3% Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: at least 100 metaphases (when possible) and 1000 cells for the determination of mitotic index
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index (calculated as percentage of cells in metaphases)
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes, defined as metaphases with multiples of the haploid chromosome number other than diploid (e.g. 3n, 4n etc.) and determined in 200 metaphases
- Determination of endoreplication: yes, defined by the presence of chromosomes with 4, 8 chromatids and determined in 200 metaphases - Evaluation criteria:
- EVALUATION OF RESULTS
The study was considered as valid when:
- the negative control cultures showed a low frequency of metaphases with chromosome aberrations, normally 0 - 3% (excluding gaps)
- the positive control cultures showed a clear increase in the frequency of metaphases with chromosome aberrations
For the evaluation of the results, the number of metaphases with chromosome aberrations of each test condition were compared to the concurrent negative control. Gaps were recorded but excluded from the analyses.
The test material was considered clastogenic in this test system if all of the following criteria were met:
1. increases in the frequency of chromosome aberrations were determined at one or more test concentrations
2. reproducible increases in aberrant chromosomes between replicates
3. statistically significance in the increases of chromosome aberrations
4. increases exceed the historical negative control range
5. increases were not associated with large changes in pH or osmolarity
The evidence of a dose-response relation ship was considered to support the conclusion.
The test material was considered non-clastogenic in this test system when the increase in chromosomal aberrations was not statistically significanct and/or no reproducibility was observed.
Results which failed to meet the above mentioned criteria were considered as equivocal. - Statistics:
- When appropriate, Fischer´s Exact Test was performed to evaluate statistical significance.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- primary culture, other: human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- dose-related toxicity which reduced the mitotic index in the high-dose group (5000 µg/mL) to 64% of the vehicle control without metabolic activation and to 10% with metabolic activation (table 1)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- First main test
As the frequencies of metaphases with chromosomal aberrations were in general unacceptably high (4% for the duplicates without metabolic activation and 7 or 3% for the duplicates with metabolic activation), the repetition of the first experiment was conducted with the identical experimental design as the initial test. The values for chromosome aberrations within the test samples were between 1 and 9%, but they were not reproducible between the replicates nor did they show any dose-related effect (the data from the initial experiment are not included in the study report).
Scoring of slides prepared from the repeat of the initial experiment revealed no appropriate increases in chromosomal aberrations within the positive control samples without metabolic activation. Thus, this part of the test was considered as invalid and therefore repeated.
Second main test
As the samples without metabolic activation revealed mean mitotic indices lower than 50% of the solvent control in all dose groups (data not shown), this part of the test was repeated with lower dosages in the second test (table 3).
Polyploid and endoreduplicated metaphases
Single polyploid metaphases were observed at few test points without showing a dose-relation ship. Therefore, this effect is considered as incidental and not treatment-related. In contrast, no endoreduplicated metaphases were observed.
In each test group despite the two positive controls treated with cyclophosphamide, 100 metaphases were counted. In the cyclophosphamide treated samples only 59 and 30 scorable metaphases were detected.
Test validity
The frequency of metaphases with chromosomal aberrations in the solvent controls was compatible to the historical control values (table 4). The positive controls produced statistically significant increases in the frequency of metaphases with chromosomal aberrations in the valid parts of the tests, thereby demonstrating the sensitivity of the test and the efficacy of the S9 mix. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 09 Apr - 24 Apr 2010
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- low test substance concentrations in Salmonella strains used, cytotoxic effects (growth inhibition) not further specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Phenobarbital (PB) and 5,6-benzoflavone (BF)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.61, 1.2, 2.4, 4.9, 10, 20, 39, and 78 µg/plate without metablic activation: TA 100, TA1535, TA98 and TA1537
10, 20, 39, 78, 156, and 313 µg/plate with metabolic activation: TA 100, TA1535, TA98 and TA1537
313, 625, 1250, 2500, and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation: E. coli WP2 uvr A - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Based on the information from the sponsor that the test substance was insoluble in water, a solubility test was performed with DMSO and acetone. The test substance was insoluble at 50 mg/mL in DMSO, and was dissolved at 100 mg/mL in acetone, and neither exothermic reaction nor generation of gas was observed. Therefore acetone was used as solvent for preparation. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: +S9: Benzo(a)pyrene (5.0 µg/plate for TA100, TA98 and TA1537); 2-Aminoanthracene (2.0 and 10.0 µg/plate for TA1535 and WP2 uvrA)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: -S9: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide (0.01 and 0.1 µg/plate for TA100, WP2 uvrA and TA98, respectively); 2-Methoxy-6-chloro-9-(3-(2-chloroethyl)aminopropylamino)acridine.2HCl (1.0 µg/plate for TA1537); sodium azide (0.5 µg/plate for TA1535)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation);
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two replications each in 3 independent experiments.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: growth inhibition - Evaluation criteria:
- If the number of revertant colonies on the test plates increased significantly in comparison with that on the control plates ( based on twice as many as that of the negative control), and dose-response and reproducibility were also observed, the test substance was to be judged postive.
- Statistics:
- The results at each concentration were demonstrated with the mean and the standard deviation.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Growth inhibition of the tested bacterium by the test substance was observed at concentrations of 10 µg/plate and above in the absence of metabolic activation as well as at concentrations of 156 µg/plate and above in the presence of metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: insoluble
- Precipitation:Yes, at 1250 µg/plate without metabolic activation and at 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the preliminary test, the growth inhibition by the test substance was observed at 20 µg/plate and in S. typhimurim TA98, TA1537 without metabolic activation, and at 78 µg/plate and in S. typhimurim TA100, TA1535 without metabolic activation, and at 313 µg/plate and in S. typhimurim TA strains with metabolic activation. Therefore, as the highest dose level of the test substance in the main tests, the 20 µg/plate dose was selected for S. typhimurim TA98, TA1537 without metabolic activation, and the 78 µg/ plate was selected for S. typhimurim TA100, TA1535 without metabolic activation, and the 313 µg/plate dose was selected for S. typhimurim TA strains with metabolic activation, and these highest dose was diluted 5 times (using a ratio of 2) to provide a total of 6 dose levels. And the 5000 µg/plate dose was selected for E.coli WP2uvrA both with and without metabolic activation, and this highest dose was diluted 4 times (using a common ratio of 2) to provide a total of 5 dose levels. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 03 May 2010 - 12 Jun 2010
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: CHL/IU
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 6h treatment with and without S9-mix: 0.02, 0.39, 0.078 and 0.156 mg/mL
24 and 48h treatment without S9-mix: 0.078, 0.156, 0.313, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 mg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Based on the information from the sponsor, the test substance was insoluble in water and physiological saline. And the solubility test was performed with DMSO and acetone. The test substance was insoluble at 500.0 mg/mL in DMSO, and was dissolved at 500.0 mg/mL in acetone, and neither generation of gas nor exothermic reaction was observed. Therefore acetone was selected as solvent in this study. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without S9-mix Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.1 µg/mL ( 6 h treatment), 0.05 µg/mL (24 and 48 h treatment)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- with S9-mix Migrated to IUCLID6: 7 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6, 24 and 48 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 h after 6 h treatment
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 0.2 µg/mL colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 0.1% crystal violet solution
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes, cells carrying greater than 38 chromosomes including triploid were recorded as polyploidy - Evaluation criteria:
- The following criteria were set to evaluate the frequency of aberrant cells in each dose group:
A final judgment was concluded excluding gaps, nevertheless, separate records were kept for both including and excluding gaps.
Negative (-) less than 5%
Equivocal (+-) 5% or more, less than 10%
Positive (+) 10% or more - Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: CHU/IU
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: at concentrations of 0.078 µg/mL and higher
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the results of the cell growth inhibition test, the dose of 50% cell growth inhibition was 5.0 mg/mL and
more all of without S9 mix, with S9 mix, 24 h and 48 h exposure. In addition, the cell growth inhibition was observed, though the cell growth rate was more than 50% at the 0.156~1.25 mg/mL doses of the 24 h exposure and the 0,313~1.25 mg/mL doses of 48 h exposure.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Yes - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type:
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 20 Jun - 29 Jun 1990
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no TA102 or E. coli strain included
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First and second experiment: 8, 40, 200, 1000, 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Tween 80/bidist. water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The suspension medium was chosen according to the solubility properties tested preliminary before start of the study. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: without S9: sodium azide (2 µg/plate) for TA100 and TA1535, 9-aminoacridine (80 µg/plate) for TA1537, 4-nitro-o-phenylendiamine (40 µg/plate) for TA98 and TA1538; with S9: 2-aminoanthracene (2.5 or 5 µg/plate) for all strains
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates each in 2 independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background lawn and/or reduced number of revertants versus negative control - Evaluation criteria:
- The results were considered positive if the following criteria were met:
- the plate background of not-reverted bacteria did not show any no growth reduction in comparison to the respective negative controls,
- the spontaneous mutation rates of each tester strain per plate were within the characteristic spontaneous mutation range,
- the positive controls showed mutation rates exceeding the control values of TA100 at least by the factor 2 and those of the other tester strains at least by the factor 3,
-at more than one dose tested, the test substance caused at least a 2-fold increase in comparison with the negative controls in the tester strain TA100. For the other tester strains, an increase in the mutation rate of more than 3 above the corresponding negative controls was considered positive. - Statistics:
- Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 5000 µg/plate: TA 1535
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- exposure duration not reported;
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The SALATRIM family of triacylglycerols differs from other fats in the ratio of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) to long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) and in that stearic acid is the major LCFA. These fats have caloric availability values (4.5-6 kcal/g) lower than that of corn oil (9 kcal/g). SALATRIM 23CA Lot
A014, a typical SALATRIM fat, was tested in in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays including the chromosomal aberration, unscheduled DNA synthesis, and HPRT mammalian cell mutagenesis assays. Corn oil also was tested as a reference fat. Both the SALATRIM fat and corn oil were negative
in the three assays. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) CHO-K1 cells obtained from the American Type Culture Collection
- Type and identity of media: in Ham’s F12 medium with 31 µg/mL penicillin, 50 µg/mL streptomycin sulfate, and 5 % heatinactivated
fetal bovine serum (F12/5). - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- final S-9 concentration of 1 %
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL
The high dose was limited by the low solubility of the fats in the assay medium. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
Stock solutions of SALATRIM 23CA lot A014 and corn oil were made in acetone such that the acetone never exceeded 1 % of the culture. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Corn oil doses were 327.7-1000 μg/mL.
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Positive controls were EMS (200 μg/mL of culture) without metabolic activation and 3-MC (5 μg/mL of culture) with metabolic activation.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium;
DURATION
- Exposure duration: not reported
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 14-17 days
Phenotypic expression of induced mutants was conducted by incubating the cells for 7 days. Cells were subcultured every 2-3 days by trypsinizing the flask, counting the cells, and replating 2 x 10(6) cells. After the expression period, approximately 3 x 10(6) cells from each culture were seeded in 100 mL of cloning medium supplemented with TG for selection of resistant cells. Approximately 600 cells were seeded in 100 mL of TG-free medium to determine the percentage of viable cells. The cells were incubated for 14-17 days and cell colonies counted with an ARTEK colony counter. Mutant frequency (ratio of mutant cells to nonmutant cells) was calculated by dividing the number of resistant colonies by the number of unselected viable colonies.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): The selective cloning medium contained 30 µM 6-thioguanine (TG).
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: The definitive study was done in duplicate using duplicate cultures for each replicate.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
Cytotoxicity was determined by detaching the cells from the culture flask with 0.05% trypsin-0.02% EDTA. A Model 2F Coulter counter was used to determine cell numbers, and an aliquot containing at least 1-2 x 10(6) cells was added to 20 mL of F12/5 to determine phenotypic expression. The remaining cell suspension was diluted in approximately 35 mL of medium so that 500 cells were plated into two Petri dishes. After incubation for 14-17 days, cell colonies were determined. Survival was expressed as the cloning efficiency (CE) relative to the solvent control. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test results were considered positive if a dose-related increase in the number of mutant colonies occurred and the mutant frequencies of duplicate cultures treated with one or more concentrations of the test article were at least 3 times the average of those from the solvent control cultures.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: Although the test material was soluble in the acetone, turbidity was noted in the cultures, indicating solubility had been exceeded.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Preliminary experiments were done to determine cytotoxicity and aid in selection of the dose range.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Results of main study (short-term treatment) and additional study (continuous treatment)
Test item |
Concentration |
Relative cell growth |
Aberrant cells in % |
|
|
in μg/mL |
in % |
with gaps |
without gaps |
Exposure period 6h, fixation time 18h, without S9 mix |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
1 |
1 |
Glycerol monooleate |
891 a) |
121.8 |
0 |
1 |
|
1783 a) |
114.8 |
1 |
0 |
|
3565 a) |
101.1 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
MMC |
0.1 |
77.5 |
4.5 |
36* |
Exposure period 6h, fixation time 18h, with S9 mix |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
0.5 |
0 |
Glycerol monooleate |
891 a) |
135.9 |
2 |
2 |
|
1783 a) |
123.9 |
1 |
0.5 |
|
3565 a) |
111.4 |
1 |
0.5 |
CP |
12.5 |
83.4 |
3.5 |
19.5* |
Exposure period 24h, without S9 mix |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
1 |
1 |
Glycerol monooleate |
55.7 |
99 |
0.5 |
0 |
|
111 |
105.9 |
1 |
1 |
|
223 a) |
87.0 |
0.5 |
0 |
|
446 a) |
91.6 |
Toxic |
|
MMC |
0.05 |
104.4 |
6.5 |
25* |
*: Significant difference from control (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.025)
a): Visible precipitation was observed at the end of exposure period.
Table 1: First Experiment - 4 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation |
|
|
||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2.36 |
1 |
|
625 |
91 |
116 |
57 |
2.04 |
0.86 |
|
1250 |
108 |
94 |
65 |
2.44 |
1.03 |
|
2500 |
106 |
83 |
36 |
2.66 |
1.12 |
|
3600 |
89 |
76 |
11 |
0.30* |
0.12 |
|
5000 |
74 |
83 |
8 |
0.04* |
0.017 |
|
ENU (50) |
53 |
62 |
45 |
# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2: First Experiment - 3 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation |
|
|
||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2.39 |
1 |
|
625 |
75 |
81 |
65 |
2.59 |
1.08 |
|
1250 |
92 |
44 |
46 |
3.04 |
1.27 |
|
2500 |
93 |
30 |
9 |
0.9 |
0.38 |
|
3600 |
90 |
5 |
1 |
0.2 |
0.08 |
|
5000 |
84 |
4 |
1 |
0.47 |
0.2 |
|
DMBA (3.3) |
24 |
50 |
29 |
# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3: Second Experiment - 24 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation |
|
|||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
313 |
82 |
9 |
2 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
625 |
73 |
4 |
1 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
1250 |
68 |
4 |
1 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
2500 |
38 |
4 |
1 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
3600 |
31 |
1 |
0 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
ENU (50) |
53 |
35 |
9 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4: Second Experiment - 3 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation |
|
|
||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2 |
1 |
|
156 |
83 |
95 |
62 |
1.95 |
0.98 |
|
313 |
84 |
101 |
70 |
1.84 |
0.92 |
|
625 |
82 |
105 |
65 |
1.79 |
0.9 |
|
1250 |
46 |
98.5 |
65 |
1.84 |
0.92 |
|
2500 |
38 |
88 |
37 |
1.93 |
0.97 |
|
3600 |
36 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
DMBA (3.3) |
28 |
52 |
27 |
37.3 |
18.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 5: Repeat fo Second Experiment - 24 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation |
|
|||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2.17 |
1 |
|
`2.5 |
102 |
100 |
62 |
2.16 |
1 |
|
5 |
100 |
114 |
151 |
2.02 |
0.93 |
|
10 |
92 |
95 |
145 |
1.97 |
0.91 |
|
20 |
105 |
100 |
60 |
2.11 |
0.97 |
|
40 |
82 |
95 |
103 |
2.17 |
1 |
|
80 |
69 |
111 |
97 |
1.82 |
0.84 |
|
160 |
25 |
44 |
16 |
2.32 |
1.07 |
|
320 |
11 |
31 |
6 |
1.94 |
0.89 |
|
ENU (50) |
16 |
31 |
9 |
51.8 |
23.87 |
|
ENU: N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea
DMBA: 7,12-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene
*: statistically significant with p < 0.01
#: could not be calculated as all wells contained mutant colonies
Table 1. Test results of the preliminary toxicity test (plate incorporation) |
|||
|
|
|
|
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard Deviation) |
||
|
Frameshift type |
||
|
TA98 |
||
– |
0 |
36.0 ± 1.7 |
|
– |
50 |
30.3 ± 3.1 |
|
– |
160 |
28.7 ± 5.1 |
|
– |
500 |
33.0 ± 6.0 |
|
– |
1600 |
34.3 ± 2.9 |
|
– |
5000 |
34.3 ± 7.0 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
2NF |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
1 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
499.7 ± 88.3 |
||
+ |
0 |
48 ± 3 |
|
+ |
50 |
48.3 ± 5.5 |
|
+ |
160 |
43.3 ± 2.9 |
|
+ |
500 |
40.0 ± 6.6 |
|
+ |
1600 |
40.0 ± 1.0 |
|
+ |
5000 |
39.7 ± 6.1 |
|
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
2AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
682 ± 26.5 |
||
2NF = 2 Nitrofluorene |
|
|
|
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene |
|
|
|
No statistical analysis was performed. |
|
Table 2. Test results of main test 1 (plate incorporation) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|||||
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation) |
||||||
|
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||
|
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
TA102 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
– |
0 |
210.3 ± 7.5 |
14.7 ± 1.5 |
469.7 ± 6.1 |
30.7 ± 7.6 |
14.0 ± 2.0 |
|
– |
50 |
210.7 ± 7.8 |
15.7 ± 2.5 |
474.0 ± 3.0 |
33.3 ± 7.2 |
17.7 ± 2.5 |
|
– |
160 |
206.0 ± 5.3 |
15.0 ± 1.0 |
480.0 ± 6.6 |
27.7 ± 0.6 |
18.0 ± 2.0 |
|
– |
500 |
205.7 ± 3.8 |
16.3 ± 2.1 |
478.7 ± 5.7 |
27.0 ± 2.6 |
15.0 ± 2.0 |
|
– |
1600 |
208.7 ± 9.3 |
15.0 ± 3.6 |
479.0 ± 6.2 |
26.0 ± 5.0 |
16.3 ± 2.3 |
|
– |
5000 |
208.3 ± 2.9 |
12.3 ± 1.5 |
483.7 ± 5.5 |
32.7 ± 3.1 |
15.7 ± 2.5 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
SA |
SA |
CHP |
2NF |
2NF |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
1 |
1 |
100 |
1 |
1 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
1136.7 ± 60.8 |
1063 ± 82.5 |
968.3 ± 78.4 |
749.7 ± 100.5 |
202.0 ± 7.9 |
||
+ |
0 |
213.7 ± 3.8 |
20.3 ± 2.9 |
405.3 ± 1.5 |
43.3 ± 2.1 |
16.7 ± 1.5 |
|
+ |
50 |
213.3 ± 3.1 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
399.7 ± 6.8 |
41.0 ± 2.0 |
20.3 ± 0.6 |
|
+ |
160 |
215.7 ± 3.8 |
14.7* ± 1.5 |
401.3 ± 10.2 |
44.0 ± 2.0 |
19.7 ± 0.6 |
|
+ |
500 |
202.0 ± 5.3 |
17.0 ± 2.6 |
405.0 ± 11.5 |
40.3 ± 2.5 |
18.7 ± 0.6 |
|
+ |
1600 |
208.0 ± 11.1 |
11.0 ± 1.7 |
406.7 ± 9.7 |
42.0 ± 3.6 |
18.7 ± 2.1 |
|
+ |
5000 |
216.7 ± 4.2 |
14.3* ± 3.1 |
405.7 ± 4.7 |
43.0 ± 1.7 |
19.0 ± 1.7 |
|
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
838.0 ± 71.4 |
276.0 ± 80.0 |
1030.3 ± 102.6 |
597.0 ± 25.6 |
366.7 ± 34.0 |
||
SA = sodium azide |
|
|
|
|
|
||
CHP = cumene hydroperoxide |
|
|
|
|
|
||
2NF = 2-nitrofluorene |
|
|
|
|
|
||
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene |
|
|
|
|
|
||
* = statistically significant at 5% level |
|
|
|
|
|||
* * = statistically significant at 1% level |
|
|
|
|
|||
Otherwise not statistically significant at 5% level (positive controls were not included) |
|
Table 3. Test results of main test 2 (preincubation) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|||||
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation) |
||||||
|
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||
|
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
TA102 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
– |
0 |
214.7 ± 4.0 |
18.0 ± 3.0 |
403.7 ± 3.1 |
36.0 ± 1.7 |
15.7 ± 1.2 |
|
– |
50 |
213.3 ± 6.4 |
17.3± 0.6 |
405.0 ± 5.6 |
30.3 ± 3.1 |
18.3 ± 0.6 |
|
– |
160 |
213.7 ± 6.0 |
18.3 ± 3.5 |
407.7 ± 2.3 |
28.7 ± 5.1 |
18.3 ± 1.5 |
|
– |
500 |
213.0 ± 1.7 |
21.3 ± 4.2 |
403.7 ± 1.5 |
33.0 ± 6.0 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
|
– |
1600 |
211.0 ± 11.5 |
21.3 ± 3.2 |
406.7 ± 4.9 |
34.3 ± 2.9 |
18.3 ± 2.1 |
|
– |
5000 |
212.3 ± 6.5 |
17.0 ± 1.7 |
411.3 ± 13.7 |
34.3 ± 7.0 |
17.0 ± 1.0 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
SA |
SA |
CHP |
2NF |
2NF |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
1 |
1 |
25 |
1 |
1 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
1103.0 ± 25.5 |
596.3 ± 25.5 |
1158.0 ± 33.2 |
499.7 ± 88.3 |
338.7± 22.7 |
||
+ |
0 |
203.7 ± 7.5 |
11.7 ± 1.2 |
459.7 ± 4.2 |
48.0 ± 3.0 |
18.7 ± 1.2 |
|
+ |
50 |
206.0 ± 12.2 |
17.0 ± 1.0 |
460.0 ± 2.6 |
48.3 ± 5.5 |
20.0 ± 1.0 |
|
+ |
160 |
213.7 ± 4.7 |
16.3 ± 4.2 |
456.7 ± 4.5 |
43.3 ± 2.9 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
|
+ |
500 |
207.7 ± 6.8 |
15.7 ± 2.1 |
455.3 ± 3.8 |
40.0 ± 6.6 |
18.0 ± 1.7 |
|
+ |
1600 |
188.7 ± 3.1 |
15.0 ± 4.0 |
458.3 ± 2.5 |
40.0 ± 1.0 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
|
+ |
5000 |
173.3** ± 9.5 |
17.7 ± 2.3 |
459.7 ± 4.2 |
39.7 ± 6.1 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
|
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
574.7 ± 30.2 |
231.7 ± 18.9 |
1140.7 ± 98.8 |
682.0 ± 26.5 |
210.3 ± 16.0 |
||
SA = sodium azide |
|
|
|
|
|
||
CH = cumene hydroperoxide |
|
|
|
|
|
||
2NF = 2-nitrofluorene |
|
|
|
|
|
||
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene |
|
|
|
|
|
||
* = statistically significant at 5% level |
|
|
|
|
|||
* * = statistically significant at 1% level |
|
|
|
|
|||
Otherwise not statistically significant at 5% level (positive controls were not included) |
|
Table 4. Historical control values |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strain |
Treatment (µg/mL) |
S9 mix |
Number of revertant colonies/plate |
Number of plates |
||||
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
||||
TA 102 |
solvent |
- |
305 |
40 |
249 |
409 |
114 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
321 |
52 |
224 |
432 |
117 |
|
|
CHP (25) |
- |
1262 |
346 |
836 |
2487 |
54 |
|
|
CHP (100) |
- |
1252 |
258 |
903 |
2000 |
48 |
|
|
2AA (4) |
+ |
1076 |
197 |
500 |
1522 |
105 |
|
TA 100 |
solvent |
- |
144 |
33 |
91 |
221 |
162 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
143 |
35 |
90 |
234 |
168 |
|
|
SA (1) |
- |
1006 |
196 |
578 |
1460 |
150 |
|
|
2AA (2) |
+ |
1007 |
362 |
123 |
2163 |
156 |
|
TA 98 |
solvent |
- |
51 |
16 |
19 |
82 |
159 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
61 |
17 |
21 |
97 |
162 |
|
|
2NF (1) |
- |
658 |
247 |
216 |
1189 |
147 |
|
|
2AA (2) |
+ |
851 |
284 |
411 |
1622 |
150 |
|
TA 1537 |
solvent |
- |
15 |
5 |
5 |
28 |
111 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
19 |
7 |
7 |
43 |
117 |
|
|
2NF (1) |
- |
357 |
154 |
121 |
919 |
99 |
|
|
2AA (2) |
+ |
301 |
202 |
67 |
1121 |
105 |
|
TA 1535 |
solvent |
- |
20 |
8 |
7 |
38 |
117 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
18 |
7 |
7 |
42 |
123 |
|
|
SA (1) |
- |
541 |
169 |
206 |
908 |
105 |
|
|
2AA (2) |
+ |
272 |
129 |
110 |
648 |
111 |
|
SA = sodium azide |
|
|||||||
CHP = cumene hydroperoxide |
|
|||||||
2NF = 2-nitrofluorene |
|
|||||||
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene |
|
Table 1. Test results of the preliminary toxicity test
Treatment (µg/mL) |
Mitotic index (MI) |
|||||
Without S9 |
With S9 |
|||||
Individual values |
Relative mean MI (%) |
Individual values |
Relative mean MI (%) |
|||
0 |
4.8 |
5.3 |
100 |
3.8 |
2.9 |
100 |
313 |
4.8 |
4.3 |
90 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
99 |
625 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
83 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
96 |
1250 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
70 |
3.4 |
2.8 |
93 |
2500 |
3.7 |
3.3 |
69 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
58 |
5000 |
3.6 |
2.9 |
64 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
10 |
Mitotic index: percentage of cells at metaphase
Individual values: values for each of the duplicate
Relative mean MI: relative mean mitotic index for the duplicates
Table 2. Test results of the first main test (-S9: second repeat test, +S9: repeat test)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
S9 mix |
Relative mean MI (%) |
No. aberrant metaphases |
Number and types of aberrations |
Number of polyploid metaphases |
||
Gaps |
Breaks |
Exchanges |
|
||||
0 |
- |
100 |
1 / 0 |
2 / 1 |
1 / 0 |
|
1 / 0 |
1250 |
- |
110 |
1 / 1 |
0 / 2 |
2 / 1 |
|
|
2500 |
- |
75 |
1 / 4 |
1 / 3 |
1 / 4 |
|
|
5000 |
- |
70 |
2 / 3 |
2 / 1 |
2 / 4 |
|
|
Daunomycin (0.015 µg/mL) |
- |
91 |
17 / 14 ** |
9 / 5 |
20 / 14 |
2 / 1 |
|
0 |
2% |
100 |
0 / 0 |
1 / 2 |
0 / 0 |
|
|
625 |
2% |
67 |
0 / 1 |
0 / 0 |
0 / 1 |
|
|
1250 |
2% |
51 |
0 / 0 |
2 / 1 |
0 / 0 |
|
|
2500 |
2% |
42 |
0 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
0 / 1 |
|
|
Cyclophosphamide (6 µg/mL) |
2% |
20 |
33a /19b ** |
16 / 3 |
36 / 20 |
15 / 9 |
|
Relative mean: relative mean mitotic index for the duplicates
No. of aberrant metaphases: Number of aberrant metaphases (excluding gaps) for the duplicates
** Statistically significant with p < 0.01
a: only 59 scoreable metaphases
b: only 30 scoreable metaphases
The numbers of determined metaphases, aberrations and polyploid metaphases are given for the duplicates (first sample / second sample)
Table 3. Test results of the second main test (repeat test)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
S9 mix |
Relative mean MI (%) |
No. aberrant metaphases |
Number and types of aberrations |
Number of polyploid metaphases |
||
Gaps |
Breaks |
Exchanges |
|
||||
0 |
- |
100 |
0 / 3 |
1 / 5 |
0 / 3 |
|
|
40 |
- |
84 |
1 / 4 |
3 / 6 |
1 / 4 |
|
1 / 0 |
80 |
- |
59 |
1 / 2 |
0 / 2 |
1 / 2 |
|
|
160 |
- |
49 |
0 / 2 |
3 / 1 |
0 / 2 |
|
0 / 1 |
Daunomycin (0.015 µg/mL) |
- |
102 |
13 / 14 ** |
6 / 9 |
13 / 13 |
1 / 1 |
|
0 |
4% |
100 |
2 / 1 |
3 / 2 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 0 |
|
625 |
4% |
66 |
2 / 4 |
3 / 1 |
5 / 1 |
|
0 / 1 |
1250 |
4% |
61 |
1 / 1 |
3 / 4 |
1 / 1 |
|
|
2500 |
4% |
33 |
5 / 1 |
3 / 0 |
3 / 4 |
|
|
Cyclophosphamide (6 µg/mL) |
4% |
77 |
36 / 33 ** |
8 / 8 |
37 / 33 |
11 / 11 |
|
Relative mean: relative mean mitotic index for the duplicates
No. of aberrant metaphases: Number of aberrant metaphases (excluding gaps) for the duplicates
** Statistically significant with p < 0.01
a: only 59 scoreable metaphases
b: only 30 scoreable metaphases
The numbers of determined metaphases, aberrations and polyploid metaphases are given for the duplicates (first sample / second sample)
Table 4. Historical Data (n = 9 previous study)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
S9 mix |
Frequency of metaphases with aberrant chromosomes excluding gaps (%) |
Number of cultures |
|||
Mean |
SD |
Mimimum |
Maximum |
|
||
Negative control |
- |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0 |
3 |
32 |
Daunomycin (0.015 µg/mL) |
- |
15.1 |
7.4 |
7 |
34 |
32 |
Negative control |
+ |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0 |
3 |
32 |
Cyclophosphamide (6 µg/mL) |
+ |
43.0 |
13.6 |
23 |
70 |
32 |
1st experiment |
number of revertants: mean value of negative control |
number of revertants: mean value of positive control |
max. number of revertants: mean value of test material [µg/plate] |
without S9-mix |
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
14 ±2 |
399 ±25 |
12±2.5 [39] |
TA 100 |
103±5.0 |
825 ± 34.6 |
113 ± 9.7 [4.9] |
TA 1537 |
11±1.5 |
1989± 52.0 |
13±0.6 [10] |
TA 98 |
19 ±1.7 |
561 ± 19 |
18 ±4.4 [1.2] |
WP2uvrA |
25 ±4.0 |
243 ±24.7 |
30 ±2.6 [5000] |
with S9-mix |
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
11± 0.6 |
399 ±25 |
12 ±2.5 [20] |
TA 100 |
111 ± 6.1 |
825 ± 34.6 |
126 ±7.5 [39] |
TA 1537 |
17 ±4.7 |
1989± 52.0 |
20±3.8 [20] |
TA 98 |
29±1.5 |
561 ± 19 |
28 ±5.0 [39] |
WP2uvrA |
28 ±0.6 |
243 ±24.7 |
33±7.0 [5000] |
2nd experiment |
number of revertants: mean value of negative control |
number of revertants: mean value of positive control |
max. number of revertants: mean value of test material [µg/plate] |
without S9-mix |
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
10±2.3 |
388± 16.4 |
8 ±0.6 [10] |
TA 100 |
121 ± 6.0 |
780 ±7.1 |
114 ±7.8 [20] |
TA 1537 |
11 ±1.0 |
2057±200.9 |
15 ±0 [4.9] |
TA 98 |
17 ±1.2 |
577 ±32.8 |
20±1.5 [1.2] |
WP2uvrA |
20 ±2.0 |
219 ±28:1 |
27 ±4.6 [1250] |
with S9-mix |
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
9 ±2.1 |
388 ±16.4 |
11 ±3.2 [78] |
TA 100 |
114 ±12.7 |
780 ±7.1 |
117±9.3 [10] |
TA 1537 |
23 ±4.7 |
2057 ±200:9 |
21±2.3 [10] |
TA 98 |
25±3.8 |
577 ±32.8 |
29 ±2.6 [39] |
WP2uvrA |
25± 3.2 |
219 ±28:1 |
35 ±2.1 [1250] |
|
Table 1. Effects of the test substance on viability and chromosome aberrations.
Test item |
Concentration |
Cell viability |
Aberrant cells in % |
|
|
in µg/mL |
in % |
Numerical |
Structural including gaps |
Exposure period 6h without S9 mix |
||||
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Solvent |
-- |
100 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
MMC |
0.010 |
105.5 |
0.0 |
39.5 |
Test substance |
0.020 |
101.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.039 |
98.0 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
|
0.078 |
88.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.156 |
82.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
|
Exposure period 6h with S9 mix |
||||
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
0.0 |
2.0 |
Solvent |
-- |
100 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
B(a)P |
7.000 |
96.5 |
0.0 |
28.5 |
Test substance |
0.020 |
96.0 |
0.0 |
2.0 |
0.039 |
92.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.078 |
86.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
|
0.156 |
84.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
|
Exposure period 24h without S9 mix |
||||
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
1.0 |
0.5 |
Solvent |
-- |
100 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
MMC |
0.050 |
102.0 |
0.0 |
41.5 |
Test substance |
0.078 |
90.5 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
0.156 |
82.5 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
|
0.313 |
76.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
0.625 |
66.0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
|
1.250 |
66.0 |
0.5 |
2.0 |
|
2.500 |
84.5 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
5.000 |
92.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
|
Exposure period 48h without S9 mix |
||||
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Solvent |
-- |
100 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
MMC |
0.050 |
94.0 |
0.0 |
58.5 |
Test substance |
0.078 |
99.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.156 |
86.5 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
|
0.313 |
74.5 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.625 |
70.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
1.250 |
79.5 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
2.500 |
87.5 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
5.000 |
92.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
MMC: Mitomycin
B(a)P: Benz(a)pyrene
Table 1: Ames Test Results - experiment 1
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (μg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate (average of 3 plates) |
||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||
TA 1535 |
TA 1538 |
TA 100 |
TA 98 |
TA 1537 |
||
- |
Negative control (water) |
8.3 |
11.0 |
72.7 |
28.0 |
7.7 |
- |
0 (Solvent control) |
8.0 |
11.0 |
80.3 |
27.7 |
6.3 |
- |
8 |
11.3 |
11.7 |
69.7 |
31.3 |
8.7 |
- |
40 |
9.0 |
11.0 |
71.7 |
28.0 |
6.7 |
- |
200 |
11.3 |
8.3 |
60.0 |
34.0 |
5.0 |
- |
1000 |
8.3 |
6.7 |
55.0 |
24.0 |
4.7 |
- |
5000 |
3.7* |
6.3 |
56.7 |
25.0 |
4.7 |
Positive controls - S9 |
Name |
SA |
4NP |
SA |
4NP |
9AA |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
40 |
2 |
40 |
80 |
|
Number of colonies/plate |
251.0 |
1262.7 |
207.0 |
762.3 |
581.7 |
|
+ |
Negative control (water) |
9.7 |
14.7 |
69.3 |
26.7 |
6.7 |
+ |
0 (Solvent control) |
9.0 |
14.7 |
79.7 |
29.0 |
9.0 |
+ |
8 |
9.7 |
18.7 |
75.0 |
32.3 |
9.0 |
+ |
40 |
9.7 |
11.7 |
79.0 |
30.7 |
8.0 |
+ |
200 |
11.7 |
13.7 |
68.0 |
30.0 |
11.0 |
+ |
1000 |
10.3 |
16.0 |
73.3 |
28.3 |
7.7 |
+ |
5000 |
3.7* |
12.7 |
53.7 |
24.3 |
6.3 |
Positive controls + S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2.5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2.5 |
|
Number of colonies/plate |
135.7 |
1403.3 |
1509.0 |
1799.7 |
1654.3 |
* Partial inhibition of bacterial background lawn
SA = Sodium azide
4NP = 4-Nitro-o-phenylendiamine
9AA = 9-Aminoacridine
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene
Table 2: Ames Test Results - experiment 2
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (μg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate (average of 3 plates) |
||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||
TA 1535 |
TA 1538 |
TA 100 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
- |
Negative control (water) |
10.7 |
12.3 |
67.7 |
28.7 |
6.3 |
- |
0 (Solvent control) |
11.7 |
13.0 |
72.3 |
29.3 |
6.3 |
- |
8 |
10.3 |
14.0 |
68.7 |
28.0 |
5.7 |
- |
40 |
13.7 |
8.3 |
75.7 |
26.0 |
7.0 |
- |
200 |
7.3 |
8.0 |
54.7 |
24.7 |
4.3 |
- |
1000 |
7.3 |
8.0 |
53.7 |
26.3 |
4.0 |
- |
5000 |
2.7* |
8.3 |
46.3 |
28.7 |
1.7 |
Positive controls - S9 |
Name |
SA |
4NP |
SA |
4NP |
9AA |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
40 |
2 |
40 |
80 |
|
Number of colonies/plate |
274.0 |
1410.0 |
192.0 |
738.0 |
646.7 |
|
+ |
Negative control (water) |
13.0 |
19.7 |
78.7 |
37.7 |
10.3 |
+ |
0 (Solvent control) |
14.3 |
20.7 |
82.7 |
40.0 |
9.0 |
+ |
8 |
13.7 |
20.7 |
76.0 |
32.7 |
9.7 |
+ |
40 |
14.7 |
16.3 |
85.0 |
35.7 |
10.0 |
+ |
200 |
11.7 |
16.0 |
75.3 |
38.7 |
7.7 |
+ |
1000 |
13.7 |
18.7 |
72.0 |
36.3 |
6.7 |
+ |
5000 |
7.7* |
14.3 |
61.3 |
34.7 |
3.3 |
Positive controls + S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2.5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2.5 |
|
Number of colonies/plate |
218.3 |
1413.3 |
1280.3 |
1637.0 |
1993.3 |
* Partial inhibition of bacterial background lawn
SA = Sodium azide
4NP = 4-Nitro-o-phenylendiamine
9AA = 9-Aminoacridine
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene
Table 3: Results of the HPRT Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Assay of SALATRIM 23CA lot A014
with and without Metabolic Activation*
SALATRIM Dose (μg/mL) |
without metabolic activation |
with metabolic activation |
||
rel. cloning efficiency (% of control) |
mutant frequency (per 106cells) |
rel. cloning efficiency (% of control) |
mutant frequency (per 106cells) |
|
0 |
100 |
15 |
100 |
10 |
31.3 |
96 |
7 |
94 |
7 |
62.5 |
100 |
18 |
84 |
6 |
125 |
89 |
11 |
93 |
10 |
250 |
90 |
17 |
97 |
15 |
500 |
78 |
12 |
69 |
9 |
1000 |
86 |
17 |
75 |
10 |
corn oil 1000** |
91 |
6 |
79 |
15 |
EMS200 |
56 |
170 |
- |
- |
3MC 5 |
- |
|
79 |
170 |
*Data represent the mean of two cultures with the exception of the 0 dose (solvent control), which represents the mean of triplicate cultures.
**Data from a independent experiment with corn oil as test substance instead of SALATRIM
EMS= Ethyl methanesulfonate; positive control for the assay without metabolic activation.
3MC = 3-Methylcholanthrene; positive control for the assay with metabolic activation.
Table 1. Results of main study (short-term treatment) and additional study (continuous treatment)
Test item |
Concentration |
Relative cell growth |
Aberrant cells in % |
|
|
in μg/mL |
in % |
with gaps |
without gaps |
Exposure period 6h, fixation time 18h, without S9 mix |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
1 |
1 |
Glycerol monooleate |
891 a) |
121.8 |
0 |
1 |
|
1783 a) |
114.8 |
1 |
0 |
|
3565 a) |
101.1 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
MMC |
0.1 |
77.5 |
4.5 |
36* |
Exposure period 6h, fixation time 18h, with S9 mix |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
0.5 |
0 |
Glycerol monooleate |
891 a) |
135.9 |
2 |
2 |
|
1783 a) |
123.9 |
1 |
0.5 |
|
3565 a) |
111.4 |
1 |
0.5 |
CP |
12.5 |
83.4 |
3.5 |
19.5* |
Exposure period 24h, without S9 mix |
||||
DMSO |
|
100 |
1 |
1 |
Glycerol monooleate |
55.7 |
99 |
0.5 |
0 |
|
111 |
105.9 |
1 |
1 |
|
223 a) |
87.0 |
0.5 |
0 |
|
446 a) |
91.6 |
Toxic |
|
MMC |
0.05 |
104.4 |
6.5 |
25* |
*: Significant difference from control (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.025)
a): Visible precipitation was observed at the end of exposure period.
Table 1: First Experiment - 4 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation |
|
|
||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2.36 |
1 |
|
625 |
91 |
116 |
57 |
2.04 |
0.86 |
|
1250 |
108 |
94 |
65 |
2.44 |
1.03 |
|
2500 |
106 |
83 |
36 |
2.66 |
1.12 |
|
3600 |
89 |
76 |
11 |
0.30* |
0.12 |
|
5000 |
74 |
83 |
8 |
0.04* |
0.017 |
|
ENU (50) |
53 |
62 |
45 |
# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2: First Experiment - 3 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation |
|
|
||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2.39 |
1 |
|
625 |
75 |
81 |
65 |
2.59 |
1.08 |
|
1250 |
92 |
44 |
46 |
3.04 |
1.27 |
|
2500 |
93 |
30 |
9 |
0.9 |
0.38 |
|
3600 |
90 |
5 |
1 |
0.2 |
0.08 |
|
5000 |
84 |
4 |
1 |
0.47 |
0.2 |
|
DMBA (3.3) |
24 |
50 |
29 |
# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3: Second Experiment - 24 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation |
|
|||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
313 |
82 |
9 |
2 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
625 |
73 |
4 |
1 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
1250 |
68 |
4 |
1 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
2500 |
38 |
4 |
1 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
3600 |
31 |
1 |
0 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
ENU (50) |
53 |
35 |
9 |
not reported |
not reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4: Second Experiment - 3 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation |
|
|
||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2 |
1 |
|
156 |
83 |
95 |
62 |
1.95 |
0.98 |
|
313 |
84 |
101 |
70 |
1.84 |
0.92 |
|
625 |
82 |
105 |
65 |
1.79 |
0.9 |
|
1250 |
46 |
98.5 |
65 |
1.84 |
0.92 |
|
2500 |
38 |
88 |
37 |
1.93 |
0.97 |
|
3600 |
36 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
DMBA (3.3) |
28 |
52 |
27 |
37.3 |
18.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 5: Repeat fo Second Experiment - 24 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation |
|
|||||
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cloning efficiency (%) |
Relative Total Growth (%) |
Mutants per 1E+4 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
|
|
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
|
||||
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2.17 |
1 |
|
`2.5 |
102 |
100 |
62 |
2.16 |
1 |
|
5 |
100 |
114 |
151 |
2.02 |
0.93 |
|
10 |
92 |
95 |
145 |
1.97 |
0.91 |
|
20 |
105 |
100 |
60 |
2.11 |
0.97 |
|
40 |
82 |
95 |
103 |
2.17 |
1 |
|
80 |
69 |
111 |
97 |
1.82 |
0.84 |
|
160 |
25 |
44 |
16 |
2.32 |
1.07 |
|
320 |
11 |
31 |
6 |
1.94 |
0.89 |
|
ENU (50) |
16 |
31 |
9 |
51.8 |
23.87 |
|
ENU: N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea
DMBA: 7,12-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene
*: statistically significant with p < 0.01
#: could not be calculated as all wells contained mutant colonies
Table 1. Test results of the preliminary toxicity test (plate incorporation) |
|||
|
|
|
|
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard Deviation) |
||
|
Frameshift type |
||
|
TA98 |
||
– |
0 |
36.0 ± 1.7 |
|
– |
50 |
30.3 ± 3.1 |
|
– |
160 |
28.7 ± 5.1 |
|
– |
500 |
33.0 ± 6.0 |
|
– |
1600 |
34.3 ± 2.9 |
|
– |
5000 |
34.3 ± 7.0 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
2NF |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
1 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
499.7 ± 88.3 |
||
+ |
0 |
48 ± 3 |
|
+ |
50 |
48.3 ± 5.5 |
|
+ |
160 |
43.3 ± 2.9 |
|
+ |
500 |
40.0 ± 6.6 |
|
+ |
1600 |
40.0 ± 1.0 |
|
+ |
5000 |
39.7 ± 6.1 |
|
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
2AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
682 ± 26.5 |
||
2NF = 2 Nitrofluorene |
|
|
|
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene |
|
|
|
No statistical analysis was performed. |
|
Table 2. Test results of main test 1 (plate incorporation) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|||||
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation) |
||||||
|
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||
|
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
TA102 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
– |
0 |
210.3 ± 7.5 |
14.7 ± 1.5 |
469.7 ± 6.1 |
30.7 ± 7.6 |
14.0 ± 2.0 |
|
– |
50 |
210.7 ± 7.8 |
15.7 ± 2.5 |
474.0 ± 3.0 |
33.3 ± 7.2 |
17.7 ± 2.5 |
|
– |
160 |
206.0 ± 5.3 |
15.0 ± 1.0 |
480.0 ± 6.6 |
27.7 ± 0.6 |
18.0 ± 2.0 |
|
– |
500 |
205.7 ± 3.8 |
16.3 ± 2.1 |
478.7 ± 5.7 |
27.0 ± 2.6 |
15.0 ± 2.0 |
|
– |
1600 |
208.7 ± 9.3 |
15.0 ± 3.6 |
479.0 ± 6.2 |
26.0 ± 5.0 |
16.3 ± 2.3 |
|
– |
5000 |
208.3 ± 2.9 |
12.3 ± 1.5 |
483.7 ± 5.5 |
32.7 ± 3.1 |
15.7 ± 2.5 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
SA |
SA |
CHP |
2NF |
2NF |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
1 |
1 |
100 |
1 |
1 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
1136.7 ± 60.8 |
1063 ± 82.5 |
968.3 ± 78.4 |
749.7 ± 100.5 |
202.0 ± 7.9 |
||
+ |
0 |
213.7 ± 3.8 |
20.3 ± 2.9 |
405.3 ± 1.5 |
43.3 ± 2.1 |
16.7 ± 1.5 |
|
+ |
50 |
213.3 ± 3.1 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
399.7 ± 6.8 |
41.0 ± 2.0 |
20.3 ± 0.6 |
|
+ |
160 |
215.7 ± 3.8 |
14.7* ± 1.5 |
401.3 ± 10.2 |
44.0 ± 2.0 |
19.7 ± 0.6 |
|
+ |
500 |
202.0 ± 5.3 |
17.0 ± 2.6 |
405.0 ± 11.5 |
40.3 ± 2.5 |
18.7 ± 0.6 |
|
+ |
1600 |
208.0 ± 11.1 |
11.0 ± 1.7 |
406.7 ± 9.7 |
42.0 ± 3.6 |
18.7 ± 2.1 |
|
+ |
5000 |
216.7 ± 4.2 |
14.3* ± 3.1 |
405.7 ± 4.7 |
43.0 ± 1.7 |
19.0 ± 1.7 |
|
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
838.0 ± 71.4 |
276.0 ± 80.0 |
1030.3 ± 102.6 |
597.0 ± 25.6 |
366.7 ± 34.0 |
||
SA = sodium azide |
|
|
|
|
|
||
CHP = cumene hydroperoxide |
|
|
|
|
|
||
2NF = 2-nitrofluorene |
|
|
|
|
|
||
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene |
|
|
|
|
|
||
* = statistically significant at 5% level |
|
|
|
|
|||
* * = statistically significant at 1% level |
|
|
|
|
|||
Otherwise not statistically significant at 5% level (positive controls were not included) |
|
Table 3. Test results of main test 2 (preincubation) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|||||
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation) |
||||||
|
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||
|
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
TA102 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
– |
0 |
214.7 ± 4.0 |
18.0 ± 3.0 |
403.7 ± 3.1 |
36.0 ± 1.7 |
15.7 ± 1.2 |
|
– |
50 |
213.3 ± 6.4 |
17.3± 0.6 |
405.0 ± 5.6 |
30.3 ± 3.1 |
18.3 ± 0.6 |
|
– |
160 |
213.7 ± 6.0 |
18.3 ± 3.5 |
407.7 ± 2.3 |
28.7 ± 5.1 |
18.3 ± 1.5 |
|
– |
500 |
213.0 ± 1.7 |
21.3 ± 4.2 |
403.7 ± 1.5 |
33.0 ± 6.0 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
|
– |
1600 |
211.0 ± 11.5 |
21.3 ± 3.2 |
406.7 ± 4.9 |
34.3 ± 2.9 |
18.3 ± 2.1 |
|
– |
5000 |
212.3 ± 6.5 |
17.0 ± 1.7 |
411.3 ± 13.7 |
34.3 ± 7.0 |
17.0 ± 1.0 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
SA |
SA |
CHP |
2NF |
2NF |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
1 |
1 |
25 |
1 |
1 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
1103.0 ± 25.5 |
596.3 ± 25.5 |
1158.0 ± 33.2 |
499.7 ± 88.3 |
338.7± 22.7 |
||
+ |
0 |
203.7 ± 7.5 |
11.7 ± 1.2 |
459.7 ± 4.2 |
48.0 ± 3.0 |
18.7 ± 1.2 |
|
+ |
50 |
206.0 ± 12.2 |
17.0 ± 1.0 |
460.0 ± 2.6 |
48.3 ± 5.5 |
20.0 ± 1.0 |
|
+ |
160 |
213.7 ± 4.7 |
16.3 ± 4.2 |
456.7 ± 4.5 |
43.3 ± 2.9 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
|
+ |
500 |
207.7 ± 6.8 |
15.7 ± 2.1 |
455.3 ± 3.8 |
40.0 ± 6.6 |
18.0 ± 1.7 |
|
+ |
1600 |
188.7 ± 3.1 |
15.0 ± 4.0 |
458.3 ± 2.5 |
40.0 ± 1.0 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
|
+ |
5000 |
173.3** ± 9.5 |
17.7 ± 2.3 |
459.7 ± 4.2 |
39.7 ± 6.1 |
19.0 ± 1.0 |
|
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
574.7 ± 30.2 |
231.7 ± 18.9 |
1140.7 ± 98.8 |
682.0 ± 26.5 |
210.3 ± 16.0 |
||
SA = sodium azide |
|
|
|
|
|
||
CH = cumene hydroperoxide |
|
|
|
|
|
||
2NF = 2-nitrofluorene |
|
|
|
|
|
||
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene |
|
|
|
|
|
||
* = statistically significant at 5% level |
|
|
|
|
|||
* * = statistically significant at 1% level |
|
|
|
|
|||
Otherwise not statistically significant at 5% level (positive controls were not included) |
|
Table 4. Historical control values |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strain |
Treatment (µg/mL) |
S9 mix |
Number of revertant colonies/plate |
Number of plates |
||||
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
||||
TA 102 |
solvent |
- |
305 |
40 |
249 |
409 |
114 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
321 |
52 |
224 |
432 |
117 |
|
|
CHP (25) |
- |
1262 |
346 |
836 |
2487 |
54 |
|
|
CHP (100) |
- |
1252 |
258 |
903 |
2000 |
48 |
|
|
2AA (4) |
+ |
1076 |
197 |
500 |
1522 |
105 |
|
TA 100 |
solvent |
- |
144 |
33 |
91 |
221 |
162 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
143 |
35 |
90 |
234 |
168 |
|
|
SA (1) |
- |
1006 |
196 |
578 |
1460 |
150 |
|
|
2AA (2) |
+ |
1007 |
362 |
123 |
2163 |
156 |
|
TA 98 |
solvent |
- |
51 |
16 |
19 |
82 |
159 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
61 |
17 |
21 |
97 |
162 |
|
|
2NF (1) |
- |
658 |
247 |
216 |
1189 |
147 |
|
|
2AA (2) |
+ |
851 |
284 |
411 |
1622 |
150 |
|
TA 1537 |
solvent |
- |
15 |
5 |
5 |
28 |
111 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
19 |
7 |
7 |
43 |
117 |
|
|
2NF (1) |
- |
357 |
154 |
121 |
919 |
99 |
|
|
2AA (2) |
+ |
301 |
202 |
67 |
1121 |
105 |
|
TA 1535 |
solvent |
- |
20 |
8 |
7 |
38 |
117 |
|
|
solvent |
+ |
18 |
7 |
7 |
42 |
123 |
|
|
SA (1) |
- |
541 |
169 |
206 |
908 |
105 |
|
|
2AA (2) |
+ |
272 |
129 |
110 |
648 |
111 |
|
SA = sodium azide |
|
|||||||
CHP = cumene hydroperoxide |
|
|||||||
2NF = 2-nitrofluorene |
|
|||||||
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene |
|
Table 1. Test results of the preliminary toxicity test
Treatment (µg/mL) |
Mitotic index (MI) |
|||||
Without S9 |
With S9 |
|||||
Individual values |
Relative mean MI (%) |
Individual values |
Relative mean MI (%) |
|||
0 |
4.8 |
5.3 |
100 |
3.8 |
2.9 |
100 |
313 |
4.8 |
4.3 |
90 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
99 |
625 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
83 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
96 |
1250 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
70 |
3.4 |
2.8 |
93 |
2500 |
3.7 |
3.3 |
69 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
58 |
5000 |
3.6 |
2.9 |
64 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
10 |
Mitotic index: percentage of cells at metaphase
Individual values: values for each of the duplicate
Relative mean MI: relative mean mitotic index for the duplicates
Table 2. Test results of the first main test (-S9: second repeat test, +S9: repeat test)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
S9 mix |
Relative mean MI (%) |
No. aberrant metaphases |
Number and types of aberrations |
Number of polyploid metaphases |
||
Gaps |
Breaks |
Exchanges |
|
||||
0 |
- |
100 |
1 / 0 |
2 / 1 |
1 / 0 |
|
1 / 0 |
1250 |
- |
110 |
1 / 1 |
0 / 2 |
2 / 1 |
|
|
2500 |
- |
75 |
1 / 4 |
1 / 3 |
1 / 4 |
|
|
5000 |
- |
70 |
2 / 3 |
2 / 1 |
2 / 4 |
|
|
Daunomycin (0.015 µg/mL) |
- |
91 |
17 / 14 ** |
9 / 5 |
20 / 14 |
2 / 1 |
|
0 |
2% |
100 |
0 / 0 |
1 / 2 |
0 / 0 |
|
|
625 |
2% |
67 |
0 / 1 |
0 / 0 |
0 / 1 |
|
|
1250 |
2% |
51 |
0 / 0 |
2 / 1 |
0 / 0 |
|
|
2500 |
2% |
42 |
0 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
0 / 1 |
|
|
Cyclophosphamide (6 µg/mL) |
2% |
20 |
33a /19b ** |
16 / 3 |
36 / 20 |
15 / 9 |
|
Relative mean: relative mean mitotic index for the duplicates
No. of aberrant metaphases: Number of aberrant metaphases (excluding gaps) for the duplicates
** Statistically significant with p < 0.01
a: only 59 scoreable metaphases
b: only 30 scoreable metaphases
The numbers of determined metaphases, aberrations and polyploid metaphases are given for the duplicates (first sample / second sample)
Table 3. Test results of the second main test (repeat test)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
S9 mix |
Relative mean MI (%) |
No. aberrant metaphases |
Number and types of aberrations |
Number of polyploid metaphases |
||
Gaps |
Breaks |
Exchanges |
|
||||
0 |
- |
100 |
0 / 3 |
1 / 5 |
0 / 3 |
|
|
40 |
- |
84 |
1 / 4 |
3 / 6 |
1 / 4 |
|
1 / 0 |
80 |
- |
59 |
1 / 2 |
0 / 2 |
1 / 2 |
|
|
160 |
- |
49 |
0 / 2 |
3 / 1 |
0 / 2 |
|
0 / 1 |
Daunomycin (0.015 µg/mL) |
- |
102 |
13 / 14 ** |
6 / 9 |
13 / 13 |
1 / 1 |
|
0 |
4% |
100 |
2 / 1 |
3 / 2 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 0 |
|
625 |
4% |
66 |
2 / 4 |
3 / 1 |
5 / 1 |
|
0 / 1 |
1250 |
4% |
61 |
1 / 1 |
3 / 4 |
1 / 1 |
|
|
2500 |
4% |
33 |
5 / 1 |
3 / 0 |
3 / 4 |
|
|
Cyclophosphamide (6 µg/mL) |
4% |
77 |
36 / 33 ** |
8 / 8 |
37 / 33 |
11 / 11 |
|
Relative mean: relative mean mitotic index for the duplicates
No. of aberrant metaphases: Number of aberrant metaphases (excluding gaps) for the duplicates
** Statistically significant with p < 0.01
a: only 59 scoreable metaphases
b: only 30 scoreable metaphases
The numbers of determined metaphases, aberrations and polyploid metaphases are given for the duplicates (first sample / second sample)
Table 4. Historical Data (n = 9 previous study)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
S9 mix |
Frequency of metaphases with aberrant chromosomes excluding gaps (%) |
Number of cultures |
|||
Mean |
SD |
Mimimum |
Maximum |
|
||
Negative control |
- |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0 |
3 |
32 |
Daunomycin (0.015 µg/mL) |
- |
15.1 |
7.4 |
7 |
34 |
32 |
Negative control |
+ |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0 |
3 |
32 |
Cyclophosphamide (6 µg/mL) |
+ |
43.0 |
13.6 |
23 |
70 |
32 |
1st experiment |
number of revertants: mean value of negative control |
number of revertants: mean value of positive control |
max. number of revertants: mean value of test material [µg/plate] |
without S9-mix |
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
14 ±2 |
399 ±25 |
12±2.5 [39] |
TA 100 |
103±5.0 |
825 ± 34.6 |
113 ± 9.7 [4.9] |
TA 1537 |
11±1.5 |
1989± 52.0 |
13±0.6 [10] |
TA 98 |
19 ±1.7 |
561 ± 19 |
18 ±4.4 [1.2] |
WP2uvrA |
25 ±4.0 |
243 ±24.7 |
30 ±2.6 [5000] |
with S9-mix |
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
11± 0.6 |
399 ±25 |
12 ±2.5 [20] |
TA 100 |
111 ± 6.1 |
825 ± 34.6 |
126 ±7.5 [39] |
TA 1537 |
17 ±4.7 |
1989± 52.0 |
20±3.8 [20] |
TA 98 |
29±1.5 |
561 ± 19 |
28 ±5.0 [39] |
WP2uvrA |
28 ±0.6 |
243 ±24.7 |
33±7.0 [5000] |
2nd experiment |
number of revertants: mean value of negative control |
number of revertants: mean value of positive control |
max. number of revertants: mean value of test material [µg/plate] |
without S9-mix |
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
10±2.3 |
388± 16.4 |
8 ±0.6 [10] |
TA 100 |
121 ± 6.0 |
780 ±7.1 |
114 ±7.8 [20] |
TA 1537 |
11 ±1.0 |
2057±200.9 |
15 ±0 [4.9] |
TA 98 |
17 ±1.2 |
577 ±32.8 |
20±1.5 [1.2] |
WP2uvrA |
20 ±2.0 |
219 ±28:1 |
27 ±4.6 [1250] |
with S9-mix |
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
9 ±2.1 |
388 ±16.4 |
11 ±3.2 [78] |
TA 100 |
114 ±12.7 |
780 ±7.1 |
117±9.3 [10] |
TA 1537 |
23 ±4.7 |
2057 ±200:9 |
21±2.3 [10] |
TA 98 |
25±3.8 |
577 ±32.8 |
29 ±2.6 [39] |
WP2uvrA |
25± 3.2 |
219 ±28:1 |
35 ±2.1 [1250] |
|
Table 1. Effects of the test substance on viability and chromosome aberrations.
Test item |
Concentration |
Cell viability |
Aberrant cells in % |
|
|
in µg/mL |
in % |
Numerical |
Structural including gaps |
Exposure period 6h without S9 mix |
||||
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Solvent |
-- |
100 |
0.0 |
1.5 |
MMC |
0.010 |
105.5 |
0.0 |
39.5 |
Test substance |
0.020 |
101.0 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
0.039 |
98.0 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
|
0.078 |
88.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.156 |
82.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
|
Exposure period 6h with S9 mix |
||||
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
0.0 |
2.0 |
Solvent |
-- |
100 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
B(a)P |
7.000 |
96.5 |
0.0 |
28.5 |
Test substance |
0.020 |
96.0 |
0.0 |
2.0 |
0.039 |
92.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.078 |
86.0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
|
0.156 |
84.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
|
Exposure period 24h without S9 mix |
||||
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
1.0 |
0.5 |
Solvent |
-- |
100 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
MMC |
0.050 |
102.0 |
0.0 |
41.5 |
Test substance |
0.078 |
90.5 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
0.156 |
82.5 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
|
0.313 |
76.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
0.625 |
66.0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
|
1.250 |
66.0 |
0.5 |
2.0 |
|
2.500 |
84.5 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
5.000 |
92.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
|
Exposure period 48h without S9 mix |
||||
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Solvent |
-- |
100 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
MMC |
0.050 |
94.0 |
0.0 |
58.5 |
Test substance |
0.078 |
99.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.156 |
86.5 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
|
0.313 |
74.5 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.625 |
70.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
1.250 |
79.5 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
2.500 |
87.5 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
5.000 |
92.5 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
MMC: Mitomycin
B(a)P: Benz(a)pyrene
Table 1: Ames Test Results - experiment 1
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (μg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate (average of 3 plates) |
||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||
TA 1535 |
TA 1538 |
TA 100 |
TA 98 |
TA 1537 |
||
- |
Negative control (water) |
8.3 |
11.0 |
72.7 |
28.0 |
7.7 |
- |
0 (Solvent control) |
8.0 |
11.0 |
80.3 |
27.7 |
6.3 |
- |
8 |
11.3 |
11.7 |
69.7 |
31.3 |
8.7 |
- |
40 |
9.0 |
11.0 |
71.7 |
28.0 |
6.7 |
- |
200 |
11.3 |
8.3 |
60.0 |
34.0 |
5.0 |
- |
1000 |
8.3 |
6.7 |
55.0 |
24.0 |
4.7 |
- |
5000 |
3.7* |
6.3 |
56.7 |
25.0 |
4.7 |
Positive controls - S9 |
Name |
SA |
4NP |
SA |
4NP |
9AA |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
40 |
2 |
40 |
80 |
|
Number of colonies/plate |
251.0 |
1262.7 |
207.0 |
762.3 |
581.7 |
|
+ |
Negative control (water) |
9.7 |
14.7 |
69.3 |
26.7 |
6.7 |
+ |
0 (Solvent control) |
9.0 |
14.7 |
79.7 |
29.0 |
9.0 |
+ |
8 |
9.7 |
18.7 |
75.0 |
32.3 |
9.0 |
+ |
40 |
9.7 |
11.7 |
79.0 |
30.7 |
8.0 |
+ |
200 |
11.7 |
13.7 |
68.0 |
30.0 |
11.0 |
+ |
1000 |
10.3 |
16.0 |
73.3 |
28.3 |
7.7 |
+ |
5000 |
3.7* |
12.7 |
53.7 |
24.3 |
6.3 |
Positive controls + S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2.5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2.5 |
|
Number of colonies/plate |
135.7 |
1403.3 |
1509.0 |
1799.7 |
1654.3 |
* Partial inhibition of bacterial background lawn
SA = Sodium azide
4NP = 4-Nitro-o-phenylendiamine
9AA = 9-Aminoacridine
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene
Table 2: Ames Test Results - experiment 2
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (μg/plate) |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate (average of 3 plates) |
||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||
TA 1535 |
TA 1538 |
TA 100 |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||
- |
Negative control (water) |
10.7 |
12.3 |
67.7 |
28.7 |
6.3 |
- |
0 (Solvent control) |
11.7 |
13.0 |
72.3 |
29.3 |
6.3 |
- |
8 |
10.3 |
14.0 |
68.7 |
28.0 |
5.7 |
- |
40 |
13.7 |
8.3 |
75.7 |
26.0 |
7.0 |
- |
200 |
7.3 |
8.0 |
54.7 |
24.7 |
4.3 |
- |
1000 |
7.3 |
8.0 |
53.7 |
26.3 |
4.0 |
- |
5000 |
2.7* |
8.3 |
46.3 |
28.7 |
1.7 |
Positive controls - S9 |
Name |
SA |
4NP |
SA |
4NP |
9AA |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2 |
40 |
2 |
40 |
80 |
|
Number of colonies/plate |
274.0 |
1410.0 |
192.0 |
738.0 |
646.7 |
|
+ |
Negative control (water) |
13.0 |
19.7 |
78.7 |
37.7 |
10.3 |
+ |
0 (Solvent control) |
14.3 |
20.7 |
82.7 |
40.0 |
9.0 |
+ |
8 |
13.7 |
20.7 |
76.0 |
32.7 |
9.7 |
+ |
40 |
14.7 |
16.3 |
85.0 |
35.7 |
10.0 |
+ |
200 |
11.7 |
16.0 |
75.3 |
38.7 |
7.7 |
+ |
1000 |
13.7 |
18.7 |
72.0 |
36.3 |
6.7 |
+ |
5000 |
7.7* |
14.3 |
61.3 |
34.7 |
3.3 |
Positive controls + S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2.5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2.5 |
|
Number of colonies/plate |
218.3 |
1413.3 |
1280.3 |
1637.0 |
1993.3 |
* Partial inhibition of bacterial background lawn
SA = Sodium azide
4NP = 4-Nitro-o-phenylendiamine
9AA = 9-Aminoacridine
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene
Table 3: Results of the HPRT Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Assay of SALATRIM 23CA lot A014
with and without Metabolic Activation*
SALATRIM Dose (μg/mL) |
without metabolic activation |
with metabolic activation |
||
rel. cloning efficiency (% of control) |
mutant frequency (per 106cells) |
rel. cloning efficiency (% of control) |
mutant frequency (per 106cells) |
|
0 |
100 |
15 |
100 |
10 |
31.3 |
96 |
7 |
94 |
7 |
62.5 |
100 |
18 |
84 |
6 |
125 |
89 |
11 |
93 |
10 |
250 |
90 |
17 |
97 |
15 |
500 |
78 |
12 |
69 |
9 |
1000 |
86 |
17 |
75 |
10 |
corn oil 1000** |
91 |
6 |
79 |
15 |
EMS200 |
56 |
170 |
- |
- |
3MC 5 |
- |
|
79 |
170 |
*Data represent the mean of two cultures with the exception of the 0 dose (solvent control), which represents the mean of triplicate cultures.
**Data from a independent experiment with corn oil as test substance instead of SALATRIM
EMS= Ethyl methanesulfonate; positive control for the assay without metabolic activation.
3MC = 3-Methylcholanthrene; positive control for the assay with metabolic activation.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Analogue justification
No data on the in vitro genetic toxicity in bacterial and mammalian cells are available for Dub TGI 24. The genetic toxicity assessment was therefore based on studies conducted with analogue substances as part of a read across approach, which is in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, Annex XI, 1.5. For each specific endpoint the source substance(s) structurally closest to the target substance is/are chosen for read-across, with due regard to the requirements of adequacy and reliability of the available data. Structural similarities and similarities in properties and/or activities of the source and target substance are the basis of read-across. A detailed justification for the read across approach is provided in the technical dossier (see IUCLID Section 13).
Genetic toxicity (mutagenicity) in bacteria in vitro
CAS 736150-63-3
The potential mutagenicity of Glycerides, castor-oil, mono, hydrogenated, acetates was assessed in a bacterial mutation assay according to OECD guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP (please refer to IUCLID section 7.6.1). S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 were exposed to concentrations of 50 - 5000 µg/plate with or without S9-mix in two independent experiments. No dose-dependent increase in the mean number of revertants per plate was observed in any tester strain up to the maximum exposure concentration. Slight cytotoxicity, as indicated by a small reduction in the number of revertants compared to controls, was induced in TA 100 at 5000 µg/plate (with metabolic activation) in the preincubation assay (experiment I) and in TA 1535 at 160 µg, 1600 µg and 5000 µg/plate (with metabolic activation) in the plate incorporation assay (experiment II). The solvent and positive control values were within the historical control values. Based on the results of this study, the test substance did not induce mutagenicity in the selected strains of S. typhimurium in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
CAS 91052-13-0
A bacterial gene mutation assay with Glycerides, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. mono- and di-, acetates was performed according to OECD guideline 471 and GLP (please refer to IUCLID section 7.6.1). Two independent experiments were performed both in the presence or absence of metabolic activation in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and in E. coli WP2 uvrA. In the preliminary toxicity screening, growth inhibitory effects were observed at ≥ 20 µg/plate in S. typhimurium TA 98 and TA 1537 (without metabolic activation), at ≥ 78 µg/plate in S. typhimurium TA 100 and TA 1535 (without metabolic activation), and at ≥ 313 µg/plate in all S. typhimurium strains with metabolic activation. Based on these results, concentrations ranging from 0.61 to 78 µg/plate were used for the tester strains TA 100, TA 1535, TA98 and TA 1537 in the absence of metabolic activation, whereas concentrations ranging from 10 to 313 µg/plate were applied for treatment of the tester strains TA 100, TA 1535, TA 98 and TA 1537 in the presence of metabolic activation. Since no cytotoxicity was seen in E. coli WP2 uvrA, the maximum test concentration of 5000 µg/plate and concentrations of 2500, 1250, 625 and313 µg/plate were selected for treatment in the main assay. Precipitation of the test substance was observed on the plates with E. coli WP2 uvrA at test concentrations ≥ 1250 µg/plate without metabolic activation and at ≥ 2500 µg/plate with metabolic activation in both experiments. No increase in mean revertant number was observed in any bacterial strain after exposure to the test substance in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. The positive and negative controls revealed the expected results. Under the conditions of this assay, the test substance did not induce gene mutations in the selected strains of S. typhimurium and in E. coli WP2 uvrA in the absence and presence of metabolic activation, respectively.
CAS 91744-13-7
A bacterial gene mutation assay with Glycerides, C14-18 and C16-22-unsatd. mono- and di- was performed according to the protocol similar to OECD guideline 471 and GLP (please refer to IUCLID section 7.6.1). In two independent experiments, S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 were exposed to concentrations ranging from 8 to 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation. At the maximum concentration, bacterial growth was partly inhibited in Salmonella strain TA 1535 in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. No increase in the mean number of revertants per plate was observed in any tester strain at the indicated concentrations. The vehicle controls were within the spontaneous mutation ranges of the historical controls and the positive controls induced the expected increase in the number of reverse mutants. Under the conditions of this experiment, the test substance did not exhibit mutagenic properties in the selected strains of S. typhimurium in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
Genetic toxicity (mutagenicity) in mammalian cells in vitro
CAS 736150-63-3
An in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay was performed with glycerides, castor-oil-mono, hydrogenated, acetates according to OECD guideline 476 and under GLP conditions (please refer to IUCLID section 7.6.1). In the first experiment, mutations at the TK locus of mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells were investigated at concentrations of 625, 1250, 2500, 3600 and 5000 µg/mL. The L5178Y cells were exposed to the test material for a period of 3 h in the presence and for 4 h in the absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix), respectively. At 3600 µg/mL, the relative total growth was 1-11% compared with the negative controls. In the second experiment, cells were exposed to a concentration range of 313 to 3600 µg/ for a period of 24 h, without metabolic activation, and to a concentration range of 156-3600 µg/mL for a period of 4 h, with metabolic activation. Since the relative growth without metabolic activation was very low (0-2%) at all test concentrations, the 24-h treatment of cells in the absence of metabolic activation was repeated with concentrations ranging from 2.5-320 µg/mL, which resulted in appropriate levels of cytotoxicity (10-20% relative growth) at 160 µg/mL. In the presence of metabolic activation, the relative total growth was 37 and 0% at 2500 and 3600 µg/mL in the second experiment, respectively. After a 3-day expression period of the cultures, the resistance to 5-trifluorothymidine (TFT) was determined in all experiments. The test substance did not induce a significant increase in the mutant frequency at any preparation time and dose concentration. The positive controls significantly increased mutant frequency. In conclusion, the test substance did not induce mutations in mouse-lymphoma L5178Y cells, neither in the presence nor in the absence of a metabolic activation system, under these experimental conditions.
Short-, medium- and long-chain triglycerides (SCT, MCT, LCT)
The SALATRIM (short- and long-chain acyl triglyceride molecules) family of triacylglycerols was assessed using a gene mutation assay in cultured mammalian cells (Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells) similarly to OECD guideline 476 (please refer to IUCLID section 7.6.1). Gene mutations at the HPRT locus were investigated in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (rat liver S9-mix) with concentrations of 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 µg/mL. Two cultures were tested per dose level. The highest concentration was limited by the low solubility of the fats in the assay medium. No significant cytotoxicity was reported. No increase in mutant frequency was observed at any concentration tested whether with or without metabolic activation. The positive controls significantly increased the mutant frequency. Therefore, it was concluded that under the conditions of the study, the test material was not mutagenic at the HPRT locus of Chinese hamster ovary cells in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
Genetic toxicity (cytogenicity) in mammalian cells in vitro
CAS 736150-63-3
An in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test was performed with Glycerides, castor-oil, mono, hydrogenated, acetates in human lymphocytes according to OECD guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP (please refer to IUCLID section 7.6.1). An initial cytotoxicity test was performed with concentrations of 313 - 5000 µg/mL in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix) for 3 h. A dose-related toxicity was observed. At the highest concentration (5000 µg/mL), the mitotic index was reduced to 64% of the vehicle control without metabolic activation and to 10% with metabolic activation, respectively. Based on these results, concentrations of 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL (without S9-mix) and 625, 1250, 2500, 3600 and 5000 µg/mL (with 2% S9-mix) were chosen for treatment of cells in the main assay for an exposure period of 3 h. Metaphase analysis was performed at concentrations of 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL (without S9-mix) and 625, 1250 and 2500 µg/mL (with 2% S9-mix). In the second main assay, cells were exposed to concentrations of 313-5000 µg/mL (without S9 mix) or 625-5000 µg/mL (with 4% S9 mix) for either 3 or 20 h, respectively. As the samples without metabolic activation revealed mean mitotic indices lower than 50% of the solvent control in all dose groups, this part of the experiment was repeated with lower concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 320 µg/mL. Based on the cytotoxicity data obtained, concentrations of 40, 80 and 160 µg/mL (without S9) and 625, 1250 and 2500 µg/mL (with 4% S9-mix) were used for metaphase analysis. The chromosome analysis of the experiments showed no treatment-related increase in the number of cells with chromosomal aberrations compared with controls. The frequency of metaphases with chromosomal aberrations in the solvent controls was compatible to the historical control values and the positive controls were shown to be valid. Based on the results of this chromosome aberration test, the test substance was not clastogenic in human lymphocytes in the presence or absence of metabolic activation under the experimental conditions chosen.
CAS 91052-13-0
An in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test with was performed in Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU) with glycerides, C8-18 and C18-unsatd. mono- and di-, acetates, according to OECD guideline 473 and under GLP conditions (please refer to IUCLID section 7.6.1). In a preliminary cell growth inhibition test with concentrations ranging from 9.8 to 5000 µg/plate, no significant inhibition of cell growth was observed after 4 h exposure in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). However, a moderate reduction of cell growth of 30-40% compared with the controls was observed at concentrations ranging from 156-1250 µg/mL after 24 and 48 h continuous exposure. Based on the results of this study, concentrations of 20, 39, 78 and 156 µg/mL (with and without metabolic activation) were used for the analysis of chromosomal aberrations after short-term exposure (6 h). In addition, concentrations of 78, 156, 313, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL were chosen for analysis chromosomal aberrations after continuous exposure (24 and 48 h), without metabolic activation. No increase in the number of cells with chromosomal aberrations was observed compared to controls in any of the experiments performed. No cytotoxic effects were observed in any of the experiments performed. An oily precipitation of the test substance was observed at concentrations ≥ 78 µg/mL, but did not interfere with chromosomal analysis of the cells. The positive controls included during short-term and continuous exposure were shown to be valid. Under the conditions of this experiment, the test substance was considered to be not clastogenic in Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU), in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
CAS 111-03-5
2,3-dihydroxypropyl oleate was assessed in an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test in Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU) according to OECD guideline 473 and under GLP conditions (please refer to IUCLID section 7.6.1). In a preliminary cytotoxicity test, cells were exposed to concentrations ranging from 6.96 to 3565 µg/mL for a continuous 24-h exposure period with metabolic activation (S9-mix) or a short-term 6 h exposure with and without metabolic activation. The test substance was not cytotoxic after short-term exposure at any concentration in the presence of metabolic activation. Without metabolic activation, relative growth was reduced to about 71% of the control value after a period of 6 h. Continuous exposure for 24 h without metabolic activation caused no cytotoxicity up to concentrations of 1783 µg/mL. At 3565 µg/mL, relative growth was decreased to ca. 13 % of the control value. The concentration leading to 50% cytotoxicity was calculated to be 2738 µg/mL. Based on these results, concentrations of 891, 1783 and 3565 µg/mL (with and without metabolic activation) were selected for chromosome analysis after short-term exposure, and concentrations of 55.7, 111, 223 and 446 µg/mL (without metabolic activation) were chosen for chromosome analysis after continuous exposure. No increase in the number of cells with chromosomal aberrations was observed compared to controls in any of the experiments performed. No cytotoxic effects were observed after short-term exposure, but the test substance was cytotoxic at 446 µg/mL after 24 hours continuous treatment. Visible precipitation of the test substance was observed at concentrations ≥ 223 µg/mL; however, this did not interfere with chromosomal analysis. The positive controls included during short-term and continuous exposure were shown to be valid. Under the conditions of this experiment, the test substance was considered to be not clastogenic in Chinese hamster lung cells (CHL/IU) in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
Overall conclusion for genetic toxicity
There are no available studies on the genetic toxicity of Dub TGI 24 in bacterial and mammalian cells. Analogue read-across from 5 source substances was applied fromin vitro studies in bacterial cells, from in vitro studies on cytogenicity and from gene mutation in mammalian cells. The results of the available in vitro studies were consistently negative. Based on the available data and following the analogue approach, Dub TGI 24 is not expected to be mutagenic and/or clastogenic.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 "General Requirements for Generation of Information on Intrinsic Properties of substances", information on intrinsic properties of substances may be generated by means other than tests e.g. from information from structurally related substances (grouping or read-across), provided that conditions set out in Annex XI are met. Annex XI, "General rules for adaptation of this standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X” states that “substances whose physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a regular pattern as a result of structural similarity may be considered as a group, or ‘category’ of substances. This avoids the need to test every substance for every endpoint". Since the analogue concept is applied to Dub TGI 24, data will be generated from data available for reference source substance(s) to avoid unnecessary animal testing. Additionally, once the analogue read-across concept is applied, substances will be classified and labelled on this basis.
Therefore, based on the analogue read-across approach, the available data on genetic toxicity do not meet the classification criteria according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.