Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
L-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)methanol
EC Number:
245-605-2
EC Name:
L-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)methanol
Cas Number:
23356-96-9
Molecular formula:
C5H11NO
IUPAC Name:
L-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)methanol

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
Balb/c
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration:
10%
No. of animals per dose:
4
Details on study design:
25 µL of treatment was applied on the dorsum of both ears on Day 1, 2, 3.
Lymphocyte subpopulations of the draining lymph nodes are studied by flow cytometry. Evaluation is based on the ratio of T cells to B cells (CD3:CD19). This ratio is an indicator of the B cell proliferation induced by the treatment of mice with contact allergens. If the T cells to B cells ratio is below 4, the tested compound is considered as a sensitizer.
Positive control substance(s):
other: DNCB

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Key result
Parameter:
other: Ratio CD3/CD19
Value:
ca. 6.4

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
With PROL, the CD3/CD19 ratio was higher than 4. Thus, PROL is not a sensitiser. It does not require labelling with any classification.
Executive summary:

In case of any question please contact the lead registrant of this product.