Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1974
Report date:
1974

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
without external metabolic activation system
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method: Culture technique, determination of cytotoxicity and test for chromosomal aberrations decribed and similar to current guideline (OECD 473)
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
112926-00-8
EC Number:
601-214-2
Cas Number:
112926-00-8
IUPAC Name:
112926-00-8
Details on test material:
Syloid 244 (named FDA 71-48): CAS-Name: Silica gel, cryst.-free; CAS-No. 112926-00-8

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: Human embryonic lung cells (WI-38)
Metabolic activation:
without
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0.1, 1.0, and 10 µg/ml (note: mcg/ml is stated: Tab. Test I, p. 83)
Dose selection: 10 µg/ml was the highest level free of observable cell clumping (see Report p. 6/7).
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water, 0.85 % saline
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: suspension
Controls
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
saline
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
triethylenemelamine
Remarks:
Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.1 µg/ml
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in suspension, 5 x10^5 cells/mL
Mutations were quantified by counting anaphase aberrations.

DURATION
- Incubation temperature: 37 °C
- Exposure duration: 24 - 48 h

Fixation: absolute methanol:glacial acetic acid (3:1) for 30 min after centrifugation
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): acetic acid-orcein stain (2.0 %)

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3/dose level

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100/dose level

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; other: "any cytopathic effect" at 24, 48, and 72 h after exposure to dose levels logarithmatically spaced


OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes

Results and discussion

Test results
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Remarks:
"clumping" of cells as criterion for maximum dose selection
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: other: Human embryonic lung cells (Wi-38)
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Anaphase aberrations (from Report Table p. 83)

Mitotic index1)

No. of cells

% cells with acentric frag.

% cells with bridges

% multipolar cells

% cells other aberr.2)

% cells with aberr.

Syloid

  0.1 µg/mL

3

100

3

0

0

0

3

  1.0 µg/mL

4

100

4

1

0

0

5

10.0 µg/mL

4

100

0

0

0

0

0

Saline

3

100

1

0

0

0

1

TEM (0.1 µg/mL)

2

100

13

4

1

3 (pp)

21

1) % cells in mitosis: 200 cells observed/dose level

2) Cells with polyploidy, pulverisation (pp), or greater than 10 aberrations

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative